Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ashling

(25,771 posts)
Sat Feb 2, 2013, 05:38 PM Feb 2013

Holding Education Hostage by Diane Ravitch



For
weeks, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and the United Federation of Teachers have been battling over the issue of teacher evaluation. Governor Andrew Cuomo set a deadline for them to reach an agreement, but they failed to do so, potentially costing the city schools hundreds of millions of dollars. The state education commissioner, John King, jumped into the fray by threatening to withhold over a billion dollars in state and federal aid if there was no settlement between the parties. Now, Governor Cuomo says that he may intervene and take charge of the stalemated negotiations.

What’s going on here? Why can’t the mayor and the union reach an agreement? Why does Commissioner King intend to punish the city’s children if the grown-ups don’t agree?

The imbroglio began with the Obama administration’s Race to the Top program. Immediately after Barack Obama’s inauguration in January 2009, with the economy in free fall, Congress passed the huge economic stimulus package, which included $100 billion to aid schools: $95 billion to be disbursed to states to avoid massive layoffs of teachers and the remaining $5 billion to be given to the US Department of Education to promote education reforms.

The new Secretary of Education Arne Duncan huddled with his advisors and decided to create the so-called Race to the Top, a competition among states for the new funds. Instead of asking states to come up with their own best ideas for education reform, Duncan laid out a laundry list of policies states must put in place to be eligible to win millions of dollars. Among them was a requirement that state governments base teacher evaluations to a significant degree on the test scores of their students. The assumption was that good teachers produce higher test scores every year, while ineffective teachers do not.


more: http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2013/feb/01/holding-education-hostage/
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Holding Education Hostage by Diane Ravitch (Original Post) ashling Feb 2013 OP
kr. the feds are apparently saying that if nyc doesn't agree to bloomberg's evaluation prescription HiPointDem Feb 2013 #1
Wouldn't surprise me if that's what they say. Igel Feb 2013 #2
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
1. kr. the feds are apparently saying that if nyc doesn't agree to bloomberg's evaluation prescription
Sat Feb 2, 2013, 05:39 PM
Feb 2013

they'll withhold funds from the whole state.

Igel

(35,317 posts)
2. Wouldn't surprise me if that's what they say.
Sat Feb 2, 2013, 11:58 PM
Feb 2013

Not likely to happen. Somebody'll cave. To fail to obtain the money would gut schools. To fail to fork over the money would be a huge political mistake.

Depends on how much the parents want to scapegoat the teachers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Holding Education Hostage...