Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,026 posts)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:11 PM Jan 2012

Paul denies Washington Post report that he approved racially charged newsletters in 1990s

WASHINGTON — Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul on Friday flatly denied a Washington Post report that he was deeply involved in the company that produced provocative, racially charged newsletters and that he signed off on articles.

The newsletters from the 1990s have dogged Paul for years, resurfacing as his presidential campaign gained momentum. The Texas congressman has denied writing the inflammatory passages — the articles included racial, anti-Semitic and anti-gay content — and said that he didn’t read them at the time or for years afterward.

The Post story published Friday said the newsletters were part of a marketing strategy by Paul’s company and that three people familiar with his businesses described his involvement with the newsletters.

“It was his newsletter, and it was under his name, so he always got to see the final product,” Renae Hathway, a former secretary in Paul’s company, told the Post. “He would proof it.”

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/paul-denies-washington-post-report-that-he-approved-racially-charged-newsletters-in-1990s/2012/01/27/gIQA6XaRWQ_story.html

So I guess now Ron Paul is pleading ignorance.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paul denies Washington Post report that he approved racially charged newsletters in 1990s (Original Post) Galraedia Jan 2012 OP
Even if I believed him,... MarianJack Jan 2012 #1
Exactly. Skinner Jan 2012 #4
Thank you, Skinner. MarianJack Jan 2012 #15
Here's something I always wondered about his "I didn't know" defense. pamela Jan 2012 #5
I find this to be a very interesting point jsmirman Jan 2012 #7
Great Point that would be valid among sane prople. MarianJack Jan 2012 #16
Who cares? He is good on weed. geek tragedy Jan 2012 #2
Wrong! Wind Dancer Jan 2012 #12
what else would he say? arely staircase Jan 2012 #3
Jesus H Fucking Christ I can think of all sorts of things he could have said Major Nikon Jan 2012 #8
bwahahahaha arely staircase Jan 2012 #10
Bwaaaa Haaaaa! Spazito Jan 2012 #11
great minds think alike nt arely staircase Jan 2012 #14
Perhaps he's suffering from brain rot like Raygun Major Nikon Jan 2012 #6
Just like Rand Paul didn't know his communications guy was a neo-Nazi skinhead. EFerrari Jan 2012 #9
at least his communication guy wasn't a "middle eastern student" arely staircase Jan 2012 #13

MarianJack

(10,237 posts)
1. Even if I believed him,...
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:54 PM
Jan 2012

...it was his "news"letter under his name which makes it his responsibility.

If he didn't know then he's stupid. Does anybody else see a potential problem with a stupid far right Texas republican in the White House? UGH!

PEACE!

MarianJack

(10,237 posts)
15. Thank you, Skinner.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 08:46 AM
Jan 2012

I can't imagine something like that flying around here with the scrutiny that you've put in place. YOU of all people must know that you're responsible for what is under your name. That paul doesn't alone disqualifies him from office.

PEACE!

pamela

(3,469 posts)
5. Here's something I always wondered about his "I didn't know" defense.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:50 AM
Jan 2012

Every person in his life, who read those things, must not have been the least surprised by the racism. If I had a newsletter in my name and I didn't write it or read it and it had a bunch of racist stuff in it, I would get a bunch of calls from people who know me saying "What the fuck is going on?" But Ron Paul would have us believe that he didn't know. Ok, so why didn't his friends or family call him and tell him? Surely, some of the people close to him read his newsletter and the fact that they weren't shocked enough to alert him to what was being said tells me no one who knew him thought this was odd. That makes me think that he is so openly racist in his personal life, no one thought anything of it.

jsmirman

(4,507 posts)
7. I find this to be a very interesting point
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:24 AM
Jan 2012

the only question I would have is are you sure that these weren't out there enough that the people he would encounter in "polite society" wouldn't be on those particular mailing lists?

Your point, overall, definitely deserves to be part of the conversation, though. I just don't understand the world of shadowy newsletters well enough to know the exact mechanics in play here.

MarianJack

(10,237 posts)
16. Great Point that would be valid among sane prople.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 08:48 AM
Jan 2012

Unfortunately, his friends and family must be as racist as he is. That's certainly the case with his idiot son.

It would certainly make for an absolute DREAM of a cabinet and WH staff wouldn't it?

PEACE!

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
8. Jesus H Fucking Christ I can think of all sorts of things he could have said
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:34 AM
Jan 2012

He could have said he took enough mescaline back in the 70's to kill a horse and doesn't remember large segments of the 80's and 90's.

He could have said some John Birch Society thugs told him they would beat him to death if he didn't sign off on the newsletters.

He could have said he accidentally left some of the newsletters in a hooker's apartment and by the time he got them back someone had edited them.

Instead he basically said...

"I'm not a racist, but I'm so fucking rock hard stupid that I let some racists write some newsletters under my name, bearing my signature, that I promoted, but didn't bother to actually read."

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
10. bwahahahaha
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:42 AM
Jan 2012

thank you! funniest f'n thing i've read, heard or seen today.
i lived in the congressional district he won in '96 and did some voluteer work for his opponent, the late Charles "Lefty" Morris (who would have made a great congressman) and these newsletters were an issue then. Lefty lost by a hair that year, in a very Republican district. He passed away a couple of years later - one of those rare non-smoker lung cancer cases. paul has been winning re-election handily, cunningly convincing everyone from right wing militia freaks to hippies that he's one of them.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
9. Just like Rand Paul didn't know his communications guy was a neo-Nazi skinhead.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:37 AM
Jan 2012

Yeah, I can see how these things happen.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
13. at least his communication guy wasn't a "middle eastern student"
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:47 AM
Jan 2012

then he would have deserved real scrutiny according to the freedom-loving paul boys and like-minded "lovers of liberty."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Paul denies Washington Po...