General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel Maddow Iraq documentary (Spoiler Alert)
It turns out there were no WMD or active WMD program weapons in Iraq in 2003.
But don't tell your friends on the West Coast!
Oh... and it turns out that Dick Cheney shot JR.
UTUSN
(70,695 posts)pipoman
(16,038 posts)Bin Laden was a middle eastern radical making threats on the US until 9-11. Hussein was a middle eastern radical who had been making threats against the US for a decade or more. Those Dems who voted for going into Iraq did so because they felt Hussein had the inclination and the means (more means than Bin Laden) to do something similar.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
pipoman
(16,038 posts)seems more like the war time norm..lies when the truth would work equally well..
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
pipoman
(16,038 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
pipoman
(16,038 posts)I don't believe that the Democrats in congress who voted to go in were..
madokie
(51,076 posts)during bush1's term Saddam was the most frequent visitor to the whitehouse where with Clinton it was Arafat
pipoman
(16,038 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Saddam was embargoed under an aircap with barely a shadow of what was once one of the more substantial military forces in the world, already EASILY destroyed by us.
Hussein presented less of a potential threat to US citizens than the leader of Belgium regardless of respective desire.
One year we will be discussing how little of an actual threat bin Laden was as well but he probably was in somewhat a better position to work mischief by the virtue of not being under "house arrest" and no doubt our best surveillance.
9/11 could have been prevented by "pre-9/11" means and thinking if any think and/or giving a fuck and/or not wickedly scheming had been on the menu but due to epic incompetence, evil and treasonous maliciousness, or some mixture it wasn't and has been ridden like Hunter S. Thompson in a rented convertible ever since.
otherone
(973 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Who knew?
SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Nyay nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)What do you mean there were no WMD's! Damn you.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)are those I did not already know.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)It would be better if they were in fucking jail!
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)Now that Rachel's searing exposé is out, should Obama direct DOJ to investigate, prosecute? Leaving aside the potentially awkward matter of whether or not he had a Constitutional legal responsibility to do so 4 years ago when he first took office, shouldn't he do so now? Everyone seems to think there's a hot trail of criminal conspiracy to commit war crimes here, so let's hear it!
It'll be interesting to see how the excitement dies down now.
avebury
(10,952 posts)Rachel started the show with Tonken Gulf before going into Iraq with the warning that if we cannot learn to take a stand against being led astray it is only a matter of time before it happens again.
I cannot forgive President Obama and his administrative for giving the Bush Administration a pass on their crimes.