Watching "Hubris."

[Brigid]

I'm already wanting to start doing this:

[NutmegYankee]

1. I know how you feel.

I argued against the war back in 2002-2003, but it happened all the same.

[Brigid]

5. So did I.

I wasn't fooled. It helped that I already loathed Dubya.

[Archae]

2. Feith is making up excuses.

Big surprise, right?

[TomClash]

3. Too early to comment nt

[NightWatcher]

4. I don't want to watch it. I remember screaming back in 01&02

We knew it back then, why bring it up again after all these years? Nothing will be made of it.

[Voice for Peace]

9. I don't think this is a purposeless re-hash.

I think it's an in-your-face presentation for the justice dept.

Going to be hard to avoid answering for this.
Big thanks to Rachel.
I am hopeful.

[just1voice]

11. It's not going to be hard to "avoid answering for this" at all

The current admin. has said it was all legal and told everyone to forget about it and look forward. The same load of heaping propaganda will just be repeated over and over again regardless of the massive amount of evidence proving treason, war crimes and felonies.

We are a corrupt country, all "Hubris" does is state it one more time.

[Voice for Peace]

12. but there is something in people that wants truth & fairness

and I think its time (our time) has come, or is coming,
or becoming.

[RebelOne]

6. I have been doing this since the war started

because I knew it was unjustified.

[benld74]

7. Missed it, do you think it will be repeated?

[JaneyVee]

8. At midnight EST

[sadbear]

10. Rachel just tore off that scab that was just beginning to scar over.

[lamp_shade]

13. Bravo. Best description I've read so far.

[AngryOldDem]

14. That's why I'm wondering if I will watch it.

Anyone who was paying even the slightest bit of attention knew the run-up to the war, and the war itself, was built on lies. And those who perpetrated those lies will remain scot-free and unaccountable -- legally and morally -- for those lies. Most likely forever.

Please don't misunderstand. Yes, this **is** an important story, but as someone else here said, it's like ripping off a scab. Unless something actually comes of this -- say, an appointment at The Hague for a few well-placed Bush administration people -- it's best to try to put it into some kind of historical perspective rather than have it feed an anger that will remain largely impotent.