Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Demonaut

(8,918 posts) Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:26 AM Feb 2013

My problem with the "Hubris" special...too short

one week of two hour "specials" would barely cover the full story..still, it's a start

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My problem with the "Hubris" special...too short (Original Post) Demonaut Feb 2013 OP

I noticed that too bluestateguy Feb 2013 #1

You're right, it was too short, the story is so complicated that each part of it shraby Feb 2013 #2

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)

1. I noticed that too

Reply to Demonaut (Original post)

Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:30 AM

Feb 2013

It stopped right at the start of the war

Maybe they could do a part II, on how Bushco maintained public support for the war for at least the next two years (and through the 2004 election), and kept duping Congress to give them more money year after year.

shraby

(21,946 posts)

2. You're right, it was too short, the story is so complicated that each part of it

Reply to Demonaut (Original post)

Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:31 AM

Feb 2013

deserved at least an hour to two hours in order to explain what went down so it could be understood, and then unless the viewer had more background to go with it, they would probably come out confused.

Reply to this discussion