Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOOPS: The GOP Governors Resisting Obamacare Are Endorsing A More Liberal Version Of Health Reform
OOPS: The GOP Governors Resisting Obamacare Are Endorsing A More Liberal Version Of Health Reform
By Tara Culp-Ressler
This past Friday was the final deadline for governors to decide whether they will take some ownership over setting up a state-level health insurance exchange, an Obamacare provision that will take effect in 2014. But even though the Republican Party typically resists handing over any power to the federal government, the vast majority of GOP governors have decided to cede all their control over their own insurance marketplaces to federal officials an uncharacteristic move thats out of step with typical GOP ideals.
As stubborn Obamacare opponents continue to resist implementing the health care reform law, most governors have refused to do any work to set up an insurance marketplace. But those GOP-led states refusal wont actually bring health reform to a grinding halt; instead, the federal government will simply step in and do the work for them. Altogether, the federal government will run health exchanges in 26 states, and partner with state officials in an additional seven states to help them set up their marketplaces:
Even though you wouldnt know it from looking at the partisan breakdown in the chart above, state-run health exchanges are actually a conservative idea. Democratic proponents of reform initially advocated for a nationally-run insurance marketplace, but the final version of the health reform law gave more control to states in order to compromise with conservatives...Ironically, as Wonkblogs Sarah Kliff points out, GOP leaders refusal to set up their own exchanges means theyre defaulting to a more liberal version of health care reform. Some members of the Republican Party have already recognized this but their attempts to convince their colleagues to implement Obamacare on a state level havent been met with much success, since the facts dont matter to the partisan lawmakers who will stop at nothing to oppose the health reform law.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/02/19/1608051/oops-gop-governors-health-exchanges/
By Tara Culp-Ressler
This past Friday was the final deadline for governors to decide whether they will take some ownership over setting up a state-level health insurance exchange, an Obamacare provision that will take effect in 2014. But even though the Republican Party typically resists handing over any power to the federal government, the vast majority of GOP governors have decided to cede all their control over their own insurance marketplaces to federal officials an uncharacteristic move thats out of step with typical GOP ideals.
As stubborn Obamacare opponents continue to resist implementing the health care reform law, most governors have refused to do any work to set up an insurance marketplace. But those GOP-led states refusal wont actually bring health reform to a grinding halt; instead, the federal government will simply step in and do the work for them. Altogether, the federal government will run health exchanges in 26 states, and partner with state officials in an additional seven states to help them set up their marketplaces:
Even though you wouldnt know it from looking at the partisan breakdown in the chart above, state-run health exchanges are actually a conservative idea. Democratic proponents of reform initially advocated for a nationally-run insurance marketplace, but the final version of the health reform law gave more control to states in order to compromise with conservatives...Ironically, as Wonkblogs Sarah Kliff points out, GOP leaders refusal to set up their own exchanges means theyre defaulting to a more liberal version of health care reform. Some members of the Republican Party have already recognized this but their attempts to convince their colleagues to implement Obamacare on a state level havent been met with much success, since the facts dont matter to the partisan lawmakers who will stop at nothing to oppose the health reform law.
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/02/19/1608051/oops-gop-governors-health-exchanges/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1173 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OOPS: The GOP Governors Resisting Obamacare Are Endorsing A More Liberal Version Of Health Reform (Original Post)
ProSense
Feb 2013
OP
Ooops. Your title suggests the GOP gov.s are outflanking Obamacare to the Left.
99th_Monkey
Feb 2013
#1
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)1. Ooops. Your title suggests the GOP gov.s are outflanking Obamacare to the Left.
Glad that's not really what's happening.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. Actually,
"Ooops. Your title suggests the GOP gov.s are outflanking Obamacare to the Left."
...I think the word "resisting" suggests this is typical stupidity stemming from the anti-Obama stance. Sometimes things backfire. This is one of those times...not that I'm complaining.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)4. It's one for the poly-sci textbooks for sure.
It is gratifying. Is a little like Obama saying "Proceed Governor" at
the debate. He had them boxed in at the state level, and it seems
to be working nicely, as planned .
msongs
(67,413 posts)3. if it leads to medicare for all and eliminates for profit death care that's fine nt