Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:12 AM Feb 2013

How long after the first 'Google Glasses' are sold will a wearer die or kill someone...

...due to the distraction of wearing them

Not coming out soon, but Google seems to think they will actually sell them at some point.



7 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
Five minutes
4 (57%)
15 minutes
1 (14%)
Half an hour
0 (0%)
An hour
0 (0%)
A day
1 (14%)
More than a day
1 (14%)
Other
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How long after the first 'Google Glasses' are sold will a wearer die or kill someone... (Original Post) onehandle Feb 2013 OP
You left off my option. I want to kill the guy wearing those things. BlueStreak Feb 2013 #1
Agree, may just slap the shit out of them though. So precious, so affected, so all around obnoxious. Safetykitten Feb 2013 #4
before long, no one would know the difference between real and digital backtoblue Feb 2013 #2
Would the video just go out to the person calling? I would hate to be on an open feed and have no The Wielding Truth Feb 2013 #35
I don't think so BlueStreak Feb 2013 #36
I did not think of that first line... backtoblue Feb 2013 #43
Cause of death will be advertising overdose, leveymg Feb 2013 #3
Who the hell would want HappyMe Feb 2013 #5
Everyone. Safetykitten Feb 2013 #6
What if they were I-Glasses from Apple? FSogol Feb 2013 #7
lol! HappyMe Feb 2013 #10
Apple is reportedly developing something for the wrist Auggie Feb 2013 #11
Apple will have the wearer hoold their wrist up to their face as an Apple salute. Safetykitten Feb 2013 #12
Funny Auggie Feb 2013 #31
I don't wear bluetooth headsets. I don't use Siri on my iPhone. onehandle Feb 2013 #14
This year I will have to, for work, nadinbrzezinski Feb 2013 #15
I tried a few out of curiosity, but even the 'best' ones sound terrible. onehandle Feb 2013 #19
That is the other choice nadinbrzezinski Feb 2013 #24
I think the Endgame may involve Ron Green Feb 2013 #17
Agreed. But at least that wouldn't be visible. onehandle Feb 2013 #20
'Douchebaggery' derives from the person inside, not what he/she sports on the outside. randome Feb 2013 #37
LMFAO! trotsky Feb 2013 #27
I can't wait for my pair. EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #8
I have an idea, how about an "iBag" over their heads? Ask passerby to describe life outside. Safetykitten Feb 2013 #13
lmao!!! bunnies Feb 2013 #25
HAHAHA!!! tblue Feb 2013 #30
I want a pair madokie Feb 2013 #9
Me, too! randome Feb 2013 #16
Just like this caused some people to become "cockeyed" Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #18
Seriously, the eyestrain from focusing between your lenses and the world can't be good for your eyes onehandle Feb 2013 #21
:D Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #22
They edited that commercial. Ikonoklast Feb 2013 #23
Haha! tblue Feb 2013 #34
Amazed at all the anti-tech people here...... bowens43 Feb 2013 #26
Having a negative opinion toward one piece of technology isn't "anti-tech" arcane1 Feb 2013 #32
I've worked in high tech for years IDemo Feb 2013 #38
Somewhere between walking out of the store, and having their first conversation with someone arcane1 Feb 2013 #28
whats gonna happen when the bifocals are needed? irisblue Feb 2013 #29
Virtually every consumer tech ever invented had folks saying "why would anyone want that" at the stevenleser Feb 2013 #33
The reality of Google Glasses ---> onehandle Feb 2013 #39
Within 8 weeks someone will die of natural causes while wearing them, and within... Poll_Blind Feb 2013 #40
"Your honor, the defendant says he was nowhere NEAR an electrical device." randome Feb 2013 #41
Cool toy but treestar Feb 2013 #42
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
1. You left off my option. I want to kill the guy wearing those things.
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:19 AM
Feb 2013

Hell, I want to strangle the people who meander around the grocery story with their heads twisted crooked so they can talk on their phone the whole time that are getting in everybody's way.

"Sup?



Not much.




I'm at the grocery store




Yeah, groceries suck.




No, not much




Broccoli really sucks



etc."

 

Safetykitten

(5,162 posts)
4. Agree, may just slap the shit out of them though. So precious, so affected, so all around obnoxious.
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:23 AM
Feb 2013

backtoblue

(11,343 posts)
2. before long, no one would know the difference between real and digital
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:23 AM
Feb 2013

scary on so many levels that i hope it's one product that's never made.

The Wielding Truth

(11,415 posts)
35. Would the video just go out to the person calling? I would hate to be on an open feed and have no
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 12:41 PM
Feb 2013

say so.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
36. I don't think so
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 02:18 PM
Feb 2013

I know the difference between sex and pictures of sex.

I know the difference between farming and playing the Farmville game.

Some of us are even able to somehow manage to get to the hardware store without needing a GPS.

This is just more of the systematic dumbing down of the national intellect.

Bunch of damn cattle we are producing.

I imagine cows are pretty happy -- until slaughter day.

backtoblue

(11,343 posts)
43. I did not think of that first line...
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 03:47 PM
Feb 2013

Eww! I do not want to be walking next to someone watching porn on their glasses! The thing is...you'd never know they were even watching it!

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. Cause of death will be advertising overdose,
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:23 AM
Feb 2013

the most lethal and nauseating form of Gibson's information sickness.



HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
5. Who the hell would want
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:24 AM
Feb 2013

that crap to begin with?




Somebody will walk into a fountain at a mall or something, just like that person that was staring at their phone.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
14. I don't wear bluetooth headsets. I don't use Siri on my iPhone.
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:39 AM
Feb 2013

'Google Glasses' are the endgame of looking like a douchebag.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
15. This year I will have to, for work,
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:42 AM
Feb 2013

Get a headess blue tooth headset.

Nope, not looking forwards to it.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
19. I tried a few out of curiosity, but even the 'best' ones sound terrible.
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:47 AM
Feb 2013

You have to turn them up so high, that I was afraid that I would hurt my ear.

If I am going to talk on my phone for more than a minute or two, I just use the EarPods that came with my iPhone.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
24. That is the other choice
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:59 AM
Feb 2013

But going to fires to cover them, yup, got the scanner on, but at times the boss needs to update.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
20. Agreed. But at least that wouldn't be visible.
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:49 AM
Feb 2013

Until the electronics actually can communicate with you in your mind, you'll still be the guy talking to yourself on the street or in a store.

Google, Where are the radishes?

Ugh.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
16. Me, too!
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:43 AM
Feb 2013

Amazing how much vitriol is amassed against people doing what they want to do and not caring about 'appearances'.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
23. They edited that commercial.
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 11:57 AM
Feb 2013

Guy falls off the rooftop and falls ten stories as Google has a glitch and tells him to step off it into thin air instead of taking the stairs.

tblue

(16,350 posts)
34. Haha!
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 12:39 PM
Feb 2013

I was thinking that looked awfully dangerous, playing ukulele while skyping with your girlfriend as you read a computer screen, while you stand one step away from a 10-story drop. Forget guns, those googles are deadly!

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
32. Having a negative opinion toward one piece of technology isn't "anti-tech"
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 12:37 PM
Feb 2013

It's "Anti-that-piece-of-tech". There is a big difference. One can like some technologies and not others. Otherwise, being "pro-tech" would mean every piece of technology is equally good and useful, which is absurd.

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
38. I've worked in high tech for years
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 02:30 PM
Feb 2013

That doesn't mean I necessarily embrace every new gadget out of the gate as worthwhile.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
28. Somewhere between walking out of the store, and having their first conversation with someone
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 12:29 PM
Feb 2013

At least now, limited to just a smart phone, it's obvious when someone isn't paying attention.

irisblue

(32,980 posts)
29. whats gonna happen when the bifocals are needed?
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 12:31 PM
Feb 2013

or the lens darkening glasses/sunglasses are needed? SRSLY?

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
33. Virtually every consumer tech ever invented had folks saying "why would anyone want that" at the
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 12:39 PM
Feb 2013

onset.

I agree that there could be some safety issues. Information overload is one of them. Fighter pilots have a lot of training they go through to try to combat this as they have to simultaneously be looking out their window, checking what is going on in their heads up display on/near their window, checking out gauges on the instrument panel, and of course flying the plane and perhaps even engaging in vigorous maneuvers.

Poll_Blind

(23,864 posts)
40. Within 8 weeks someone will die of natural causes while wearing them, and within...
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 02:43 PM
Feb 2013

...four months someone will be killed wearing them. Within 15 months someone will kill with them on.

Within two 1/2 years, there will be an illicit trade in first-person videos involving the commission of a crime.

Oh, and almost forgot: Within 72 hours of being sold they'll be used to generate pornographic content.

Also, within 9 months of release, 1d4 low-budget filmmakers will use the concept as a gimmick, either for mystery, suspense or horror.

Edit: My word is prophecy.

PB

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
41. "Your honor, the defendant says he was nowhere NEAR an electrical device."
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 02:46 PM
Feb 2013

"But what's that he's wearing?"

treestar

(82,383 posts)
42. Cool toy but
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 02:55 PM
Feb 2013

is there no end to this stuff? Can't we still walk around and yet think while doing so? I can check for the foot directions on the phone, which is cool, but I don't need it to be that easy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How long after the first ...