General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is why Kurt Vonnegut is underrated
TUE FEB 26, 2013 AT 07:48 AM PST
This is why Kurt Vonnegut is underrated
bypierre9045Follow
In the shadow of the looming sequester, as elected government representatives, as they're wont to do, argue about whether they should choose between cutting services that help the poor and general populace, or raising taxes on the wealthy, I was reminded of this excerpt from a Kurt Vonnegut book, that I think helps to point out just how long we've been having this exact same conversation:
When the United States of America, which was meant to be a Utopia for all, was less than a century old, Noah Rosewater and a few men like him demonstrated the folly of the Founding Fathers in one respect: those sadly recent ancestors had not made it the law of the Utopia that the wealth of each citizen should be limited.
This oversight was engendered by a weak-kneed sympathy for those who loved expensive things and by the feeling that the continent was so vast and valuable, and the population so thin and enterprising, that no thief, no matter how fast he stole, could more than mildly inconvenience anyone.
Noah and a few like him perceived that the continent was in fact finite, and that venal office-holders, legislators in particular, could be persuaded to toss up great hunks of it for grabs, and to toss them in such a way as to have them land where Noah and his kind were standing.
Thus did a handful of rapacious citizens come to control all that was worth controlling in America. Thus was the savage and stupid and entirely inappropriate and unnecessary and humorless American class system created. Honest, industrious, peaceful citizens were classed as bloodsuckers, if they asked to be paid a living wage. And they saw that praise was reserved henceforth for those who devised means of getting paid enormously for committing crimes against which no laws had been passed. Thus the American dream turned belly up, turned green, bobbed to the scummy surface of cupidity unlimited, filled with gas, went bang in the noonday sun.
E pluribus unum is surely an ironic motto to inscribe on the currency of this Utopia gone bust, for every grotesquely rich American represents property, privileges, and pleasures that have been denied the many. An even more instructive motto, in light of history made by the Noah Rosewaters, might be: Grab much too much, or you'll get nothing at all.
-Kurt Vonnegut, God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/02/26/1189927/-This-is-why-Kurt-Vonnegut-is-underrated
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)Alas.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)By whom?
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)My mother, who read a lot and even reviewed books for the local paper (I remember a review of "The Tin Drum"!) didn't like Vonnegut at all.
Meanwhile, I was laughing my ass off in High School reading "Breakfast of Champions".
bvar22
(39,909 posts)!
Response to kpete (Original post)
matwilson Message auto-removed
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)What a bizarre statement that is!
I can only assume his tongue was firmly in cheek.
Then again, Vonnegut was a male WASP, son of parents who were not poor. So, maybe he truly believed that monetary inequality was the only flaw of the Founders?
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)But it was also meant to be as inclusive as possible. The Founders, however, realized that the Constitution wasn't entirely perfect, and I do recall that they warned against Constitution worship, as well as had hoped for a "revolution" of sorts in every generation.....and they didn't mean overthrowing the government, either(Hint: It's the key element in the word "Progressive". ).
merrily
(45,251 posts)As far as the word Progressive, I'd rather not debate it. It really has nothing to do with the Founders anyway, certainly not as used today.
As far as what the Founders meant, they did not all mean one thing.
ETA: Besides, this thread is about a quote from Vonnegut. So, what things meant to him would be the point.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)To highlight that particular issue. I don't think he intended it as an actual analysis/description of the Founding Fathers.
That said, while obviously the Founding Fathers were products of their time, I think they were trying to do something new and better than what had gone before. And largely succeeded.
Bryant
Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)If you can get past the word "utopia" and what the various Founders had in mind, Vonnegut offerred some very relevant commentary on the rapacious excess of wealth accumulation, our corrupt political process, and the impact of this inequity on average citizens.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)This is a brilliant line that Vonnegut would probably be proud to hear you say, just append it to anything you say.
Seriously though, read some more Vonnegut, learn his history, realize that this quote is from a novel and colored through the eyes of his character and know that he was a champion of us all that should be cherished and taught in all schools.
moondust
(19,988 posts)wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)and many of the pioneer groups had the same. There is a very long history of utopian/communal experiments in the US (see the Citadel in Idaho as the most recent example). That's probably what Vonnegut is referring to.
cer7711
(502 posts)randr
(12,412 posts)Deserves a re-read.
reflection
(6,286 posts)And that is why my sig hasn't changed in a long, long time.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)And rest in peace.
Johonny
(20,851 posts)is super funny.