Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate GOP ponders shifting sequester power to Obama
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/senate-gop-ponders-shifting-power-to-obama-88149.html?ml=po_rDays before the March 1 deadline, Senate Republicans are circulating a draft bill that would cancel $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts and instead turn over authority to President Barack Obama to achieve the same level of savings under a plan to be filed by March 8.
The five- page document, which has the tacit support of Senate GOP leaders, represents a remarkable shift for the party. Having railed against Senate Democrats for not passing a budget, Republicans are now proposing that Congress surrender an important piece of its Constitutional power of the purse for the last seven months of this fiscal year.
As proposed, lawmakers would retain the power to overturn the presidents spending plan by March 22, but only under a resolution of disapproval that would demand two-thirds majorities in both the House and Senate to prevail over an Obama veto.
The proposal would require like the sequester that no more than $42.6 billion of the cuts come at the expense of defense programs. But the elaborate, almost Rube Goldberg construct is already provoking sharp criticism from Republicans and Democrats alike and reflects a political scramble to escape the fallout from the sequester.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 997 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate GOP ponders shifting sequester power to Obama (Original Post)
NNN0LHI
Feb 2013
OP
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)1. As Admiral Ackbar would say
"It's a trap."
madokie
(51,076 posts)2. Hopefully the President won't bite
this is a trap no doubt.
they can't deal with him straight up, he kicks their sorry asses, so they've trying trickery now. What gets me is they are doing all this out in the open and people aren't out in the streets
reformist2
(9,841 posts)3. Doesn't Obama already have the power to decide what gets cut?
As Repugs are finding out, "across the board" cuts don't mean what they thought. They miscalculated. Again.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)4. Agreeing that it is a trap and would like to point out
that the House has shifted its powers under the constitution to the Senate in regard to the purse. The larger congress has shifted war powers to the executive. Cowards all. Should such a bill come out of the Senate, the President should veto it and force the House back to do its job as defined by the constitution.
malaise
(269,028 posts)5. The bill must start in the ReTHUG House of Reprsentatives
Fuck them - they don't want their pen on this one, but they want to destroy entitlements.
Fuck all fucking ReTHUGs.
Bring 'em on Mr. President.