Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Astrad

(466 posts)
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 10:14 AM Feb 2013

Tony Blair says Iraq would be far worse today under Saddam Hussein

Blair added that the price of the invasion that saw the death of at least 100,000 civilians and 179 British soldiers was "very, very high" but implored people to ask what would have happened had Saddam not been deposed.

Asked whether he minded if "people call you a liar, some people call you a war criminal, protesters follow you, it's difficult to walk down the street in a country", he replied: "It really doesn't matter whether it's taken its toll on me."

Blair added that he had "long since given up trying to persuade people it was the right decision".


http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/feb/26/tony-blair-iraq-bbc-newsnight

I wish this guy would just go away...
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tony Blair says Iraq would be far worse today under Saddam Hussein (Original Post) Astrad Feb 2013 OP
It's possible they would be worse off for one big reason Renew Deal Feb 2013 #1
He or his sons would have been toppled during the Arab Spring pbrower2a Feb 2013 #3
Easier said than fine as we've seen in some countries Renew Deal Feb 2013 #5
you don't say Capt. Obvious Feb 2013 #7
Depends on one's perspective Lurks Often Feb 2013 #2
It would be a hell of a lot more congested... Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2013 #4
He need's to tell himself that so he can sleep at night.. NOVA_Dem Feb 2013 #6
Not one fucking thing would have happened malaise Feb 2013 #8
R#1 & K for, well whose personal responsibility IS it, Tony?!1 (Whups, EDIT BELOW) UTUSN Feb 2013 #9

Renew Deal

(81,860 posts)
1. It's possible they would be worse off for one big reason
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 10:28 AM
Feb 2013

Saddam wasn't going to live forever. I think he was already in his 60's. if the sons took over I think things would have gotten really bad.

pbrower2a

(132 posts)
3. He or his sons would have been toppled during the Arab Spring
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 10:38 AM
Feb 2013

...to the delight of about everyone else in the world.

We should have let the Iraqi popular revolution take its course in 1990. The Coalition made a big mistake by letting Saddam's government use helicopters to 'examine the war damage'.

Renew Deal

(81,860 posts)
5. Easier said than fine as we've seen in some countries
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 10:44 AM
Feb 2013

But I agree that we shouldn't have went in in the first place.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
2. Depends on one's perspective
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 10:35 AM
Feb 2013

If you are a Kurd or a Shia, you probably believe that you are better off now that you were under Saddam. If you are Sunni, you'll feel you are worse off.


Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
4. It would be a hell of a lot more congested...
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 10:42 AM
Feb 2013

According to the British medical journal Lancet, there have been more than 600,000 civilian deaths in Iraq during the past 15 years. Just think if all those people were on the street at rush hour or trying to get into the latest movie. We've done the Iraqi people a great service.

Just in case it's necessary...

UTUSN

(70,700 posts)
9. R#1 & K for, well whose personal responsibility IS it, Tony?!1 (Whups, EDIT BELOW)
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 11:28 AM
Feb 2013

ON EDIT: I misread the title. Thought it said the a-hole was saying it's worse NOW.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tony Blair says Iraq woul...