Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 11:58 AM Feb 2013

They're Baaack: U.S. Banks Had Their Second-Best Year Ever in 2012

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/02/theyre-baaack-us-banks-had-their-second-best-year-ever-in-2012/273561/

U.S. banks celebrated their second-most-profitable year in 2012 with a whopping $141 billion in net income last year. That's scarcely smaller than the record, $145 billion, set just before the crash, in 2006, according to the FDIC.

I wondered: What do the last three decades in bank profits look like? Based on FDIC data (and adjusting for inflation), they look like this.



This weekend, Evan Soltas drew a wonderful graph showing that the financial industry takes home half of all corporate profits -- up from 10 percent after World War II. When you build an economy that subsidizes debt through homeownership, gives preferential treatment to investment income, and guarantees that the biggest banks will never fail, you get what you ask for. A country where finance plays by a separate set of rules and runs away with half the pro
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They're Baaack: U.S. Banks Had Their Second-Best Year Ever in 2012 (Original Post) xchrom Feb 2013 OP
K&R woo me with science Feb 2013 #1
What a relief! City Lights Feb 2013 #2
and all from taxpayers. HiPointDem Feb 2013 #3
kick woo me with science Mar 2013 #4
kick woo me with science Mar 2013 #5
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They're Baaack: U.S. Bank...