General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI feel like I'm cheating on Rachel....
Why oh why does Current TV have to put Jennifer Granholm's show on at the same time as Rachel????
On another note... what a problem for a Democrat to have
Homer12
(1,866 posts)Okay but that's how I am dealing with it.
I am not trying to be creepy.
niyad
(113,336 posts)julian09
(1,435 posts)gateley
(62,683 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)hyphenate
(12,496 posts)Since all three of the Current TV and MSNBC are repeated after their initial broadcast, you can watch them all, if you're willing to DVR one set, or if you want to stay up late. The Current ones are repeated several times, actually, and you can watch them the next day if needed.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Seriously - I wish they weren't competing against each other, but complementing each other instead.
We need all the "Liberal Media" voices we can get!
JI7
(89,252 posts)tyne
(1,248 posts)our primary which was seen as an embarrassment of riches? Yes, I see your point
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)and current at nite
PDittie
(8,322 posts)You have lots of alternative viewing options. The only reason to watch any program live is if you want to be measured -- mostly indirectly -- in the show's Nielsen ratings.
I tend to watch live more than not, and find myself going back and forth between Ed and Keith. (But not David Schuster or Bill Press, FWIW). I suspect it will be the same with Rachel and Jennifer, though there are more and better reasons to tape one of those two.
This is another example of Current really sticking it in Phil Griffin's ear. Which is entertaining in is own way.