General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumshigh schooler who disarmed another student suspended for non cooperation with police
In reading the original heated thread about the story I noticed some speculation the suspension was due to misguided "zero tolerance" policy. However I was just watching The Young Turks covering the story, video below, and learned the boy was suspended for...not cooperating with police!
TYT cites a huffington article that cites a local TV station that reported:
...
He (the intended victim) tells us other students came to his rescue, wrestling the gun from Davis. He's upset and so are parents.
He believes the students who saved him are in trouble for no reason.
According to the district here's what they did wrong. They didn't tell deputies the truth about what happened on board that bus late Tuesday afternoon and they refused to cooperate.
The mother showed us the letter she got. It outlines what exactly led to her son's three-day suspension.
"My son did what he had to do," she said.
She admits he might not have been forthcoming because he was afraid of what could happen to him, his family and his friend who stared down the barrel of a gun.
"It's just how we were born and raised. We don't snitch," she said.
So it looks like the victim and some other boys were trying to prevent their football player videos from getting in trouble?
dsc
(52,166 posts)and have to say I find this reason for the suspension worse than the other one. The other one at least had the notion that violence can't be tolerated. But this is putting on school children a duty that we don't put on adults. I have to say if they did this to my kid they would be speaking to a lawyer the very next day.
alp227
(32,046 posts)Actually, adults do face criminal penalties for lying to police.
dsc
(52,166 posts)not lie. To me refuse to cooperate means they refused to answer not lying.
alp227
(32,046 posts)dsc
(52,166 posts)they may have refused to answer which is what refusing to cooperate means.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)especially if it could impede or misdirect an official investigation.
Suspension is appropriate.
TomClash
(11,344 posts)Obey.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)and cooperation and stuff that has no place in school
TomClash
(11,344 posts)I thought school was for learning and thinking. How passé of me.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I'm thinking you haven't been around a high school lately.
TomClash
(11,344 posts)LOL - Order, Discipline, Conformity. Sounds like school all right.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Her son's suspension is her own fault and she should STFU and stop whining about it. She should be proud that he "didn't snitch".
tclambert
(11,087 posts)And if they want to lawyer up, how the hell does a school official get to deny them their rights?
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Over reach by schools is common. They tried it with us. It did not end well for the primary staff member.
In this case, the students were claiming fear of off campus consequences.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I am sure Florida is one such state
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)... then you should shut up and deal with the consequences of your lessons.
Congrats to another idiot parent!
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)But what a fucking moronic family that is for their "anti-snitch" policy.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)"Anything you say can and will be used against you."
If the cops want better cooperation, they need to do something about that adversarial attitude.