Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 07:59 AM Mar 2013

One way to pay for cops in schools: using asset forfeiture money

Sheriff proposes school resource officer plan using asset forfeiture money

WOODSTOCK - Shenandoah County could keep law enforcement in all of its public schools under a deal the sheriff proposed this week.

Sheriff Timothy C. Carter explained to the Board of Supervisors at its work session Thursday night that if the county continued to provide some funding for school resource officers, his agency would supplement the rest of the cost.

Carter used the model the board initiated weeks ago under which the county allocated $50,000 to help cover the cost to put deputies in the schools without resource officers for the remaining 80 days of the year. The sheriff explained that his proposal would call for the county to continue that funding through the 180 days of the next school year. In exchange, the Sheriff's Office would provide supplementary funding to cover the remaining costs to employ resource officers at all 10 schools.

The sheriff also noted that such a deal should span at least five years, attempting to belay concerns that the county would need to find a way to fund the positions after the first year. The Sheriff's Office also would cover the cost of equipment for the officers, such as vehicles.

Carter proposed his office would use money collected through asset forfeiture. He told board members he had contacted officials in the agency that handles asset forfeiture and they confirmed on Tuesday the Sheriff's Office may use that money to supplement the salaries for the additional resource officers. Carter added that the official sources determined such a use of funds would not constitute as supplanting, which is strictly forbidden under the rules of asset forfeiture.

http://www.nvdaily.com/news/2013/03/sheriff-poses-school-officer-plan.php

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One way to pay for cops in schools: using asset forfeiture money (Original Post) The Straight Story Mar 2013 OP
I don't want cops in schools. nt LWolf Mar 2013 #1
A possible downside I see... Bay Boy Mar 2013 #2
Just what we need, another way to steal property. Not counting making schools look like jails. hobbit709 Mar 2013 #3
No asset forfeiture, and no armed cops in schools demwing Mar 2013 #4
ditto comments 1 through 3. police state thinking. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #5

Bay Boy

(1,689 posts)
2. A possible downside I see...
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 08:04 AM
Mar 2013

...is it may encourage police to go out and bust pot smokers and take all their property for just smoking pot for personal use.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
4. No asset forfeiture, and no armed cops in schools
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 08:11 AM
Mar 2013

Funding through asset forfeitures just encourages increased asset seizures when the budget is tapped out.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One way to pay for cops i...