Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LiberalFighter

(50,950 posts)
8. I wonder if the Repugs conspired to eliminate local and state govt jobs.
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:34 PM
Feb 2012

And if so, can it be proved?

 

abowsh

(45 posts)
3. At least we are on a positive track in job growth, however...
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 10:39 AM
Feb 2012

the labor participation rate is still very low.

http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

2011 64.2 64.2 64.2 64.2 64.2 64.1 64.0 64.1 64.1 64.1 64.0 64.0
2012 63.7

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
5. What is the Labor Force Participation Rate?
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 10:59 AM
Feb 2012

What is the Labor Force Participation Rate?

Question: What is the Labor Force Participation Rate?
Answer: The labor force participation rate is the percentage of working-age persons in an economy who:

Are employed
Are unemployed but looking for a job

Typically "working-age persons" is defined as people between the ages of 16-64. People in those age groups who are not counted as participating in the labor force are typically students, homemakers, and persons under the age of 64 who are retired. In the United States the labor force participation rate is usually around 67-68%.

More:
http://economics.about.com/od/unemploymentrate/f/labor_force.htm


 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
7. Maybe a more meaningful statistic than unemployment, which is subject to manipulation...
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 11:12 AM
Feb 2012

A lower proportion of the people is drawing an income from labor than ever.

This is a clean statistic; no recategorization of the unemployed as "not looking" or "out of labor force."

However, I see it defines the age parameter as 16 and up.

Does this mean it includes the growing number of people in their 70s and 80s as labor force?

ON EDIT: According to above definition, it does not include over-65, but I'd love to see it on the BLS site as linked to be certain.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This cnn chart tells the ...