General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis cnn chart tells the tale...
http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/03/news/economy/jobs_report_unemployment/index.htm?iid=LeadIan David
(69,059 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)Ian David
(69,059 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)And if so, can it be proved?
doc03
(35,348 posts)S&P devaluation they caused.
abowsh
(45 posts)the labor participation rate is still very low.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
2011 64.2 64.2 64.2 64.2 64.2 64.1 64.0 64.1 64.1 64.1 64.0 64.0
2012 63.7
Ian David
(69,059 posts)What is the Labor Force Participation Rate?
Question: What is the Labor Force Participation Rate?
Answer: The labor force participation rate is the percentage of working-age persons in an economy who:
Are employed
Are unemployed but looking for a job
Typically "working-age persons" is defined as people between the ages of 16-64. People in those age groups who are not counted as participating in the labor force are typically students, homemakers, and persons under the age of 64 who are retired. In the United States the labor force participation rate is usually around 67-68%.
More:
http://economics.about.com/od/unemploymentrate/f/labor_force.htm
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)A lower proportion of the people is drawing an income from labor than ever.
This is a clean statistic; no recategorization of the unemployed as "not looking" or "out of labor force."
However, I see it defines the age parameter as 16 and up.
Does this mean it includes the growing number of people in their 70s and 80s as labor force?
ON EDIT: According to above definition, it does not include over-65, but I'd love to see it on the BLS site as linked to be certain.