General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKrugman: Romney Isn’t Concerned
By PAUL KRUGMAN
<...>
Faced with criticism, the candidate has claimed that he didnt mean what he seemed to mean, and that his words were taken out of context. But he quite clearly did mean what he said. And the more context you give to his statement, the worse it gets.
First of all, just a few days ago, Mr. Romney was denying that the very programs he now says take care of the poor actually provide any significant help. On Jan. 22, he asserted that safety-net programs yes, he specifically used that term have massive overhead, and that because of the cost of a huge bureaucracy very little of the money thats actually needed by those that really need help, those that cant care for themselves, actually reaches them.
This claim, like much of what Mr. Romney says, was completely false: U.S. poverty programs have nothing like as much bureaucracy and overhead as, say, private health insurance companies. As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has documented, between 90 percent and 99 percent of the dollars allocated to safety-net programs do, in fact, reach the beneficiaries. But the dishonesty of his initial claim aside, how could a candidate declare that safety-net programs do no good and declare only 10 days later that those programs take such good care of the poor that he feels no concern for their welfare?
<...>
Now, the truth is that the safety net does need repair. It provides a lot of help to the poor, but not enough. Medicaid, for example, provides essential health care to millions of unlucky citizens, children especially, but many people still fall through the cracks: among Americans with annual incomes under $25,000, more than a quarter 28.7 percent dont have any kind of health insurance. And, no, they cant make up for that lack of coverage by going to emergency rooms.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/03/opinion/krugman-romney-isnt-concerned.html
pampango
(24,692 posts)spending with almost two-thirds of the proposed spending cuts coming at the expense of low-income Americans. To the extent that Mr. Romney has differentiated his position from the Ryan plan, it is in the direction of even harsher cuts for the poor; his Medicaid proposal appears to involve a 40 percent reduction in financing compared with current law.
So Mr. Romneys position seems to be that we need not worry about the poor thanks to programs that he insists, falsely, dont actually help the needy, and which he intends, in any case, to destroy.
Mitt really isn't concerned (and I 'm guessing most republican voters know this) and doesn't plan on 'fixing it' (and repub voters again know that he's just throwing the phrase "fix it" out there to calm the "liberal media" .
ProSense
(116,464 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The more "context" you put his stupid remarks in, the worse and worse he looks. People called Joe Biden a "gaffe machine"??!!?? Mittens says more idiotic and out-of-touch things in a week than Joe ever did in a year.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)I think they would vote for anyone or anything that had an R after their name. They are most definitely NOT issue voters, unless the issue is taking rights from people...They are all in favor of that...
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)but the people who don't follow politics closely are going to care when the Obama campaign starts running the ads of Mittens actually saying this stuff come September and October.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Romney was speaking from his heart, necrotic and freezer burned as it may be.