General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOrganic Eden Foods’ quiet right-wing agenda
Organic Eden Foods quiet right-wing agenda
A crunchy, natural food company marketed to liberals quietly sues to stop covering employees' contraception
By Irin Carmon
The slogan for Eden Foods, which describes itself as the oldest natural and organic food company in North America, is creation and maintenance of purity in food. Its CEO and founder, Michael Potter, has been prominent in debates over labeling of organic food and GMOs. But the company has been quietly seeking in court another form of purity to Catholic doctrine about sex being solely for procreation. That goes not just for Potter, but for all 128 of his employees.
That is, Eden Foods an organic food company with no shortage of liberal customers has quietly pursued a decidedly right-wing agenda, suing the Obama administration for exemption from the mandate to cover contraception for its employees under the Affordable Care Act. In court filings, Eden Foods, represented by the conservative Thomas More Law Center, alleges that its rights have been violated under the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.
Eden Foods, which did not respond to a request for comment, says in its filing that the company believes of birth control that these procedures almost always involve immoral and unnatural practices. The complaint also says that Plaintiffs believe that Plan B and ella can cause the death of the embryo, which is a person. (Studies show that neither Plan B nor Ella interfere with fertilization, which is the Catholic definition of the beginning of life, if not the medical one. In other words, not the death of an embryo. Also, at that stage, its a zygote, not an embryo let alone a person.) The filing also said that Plaintiff Eden Foods products, methods, and accomplishments are described by critics as: tasteful, nutritious, wholesome, principled, unrivaled, nurturing, pure.
Until now, Eden Foods conservative advocacy litigation has remained mostly under the radar, even as their marketing seems designed to appeal to liberals, from the slogan Organic agriculture is societys brightest hope for positive change to the sixties imagery and the use of the word revolution in some of its print marketing. The companys mission statement includes its goal to contribute to peaceful evolution on earth, to maintain a healthy, respectful, challenging, and rewarding environment for employees, and to cultivate sound relationships with other organizations and individuals who are like minded and involved in like pursuits.
more...
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/organic_eden_foods_quiet_right_wing_agenda/
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)Cheers!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Instead of the dried-out commercial versions, saute fat from chops or roasts slowly for a long time et viola--a superior juicy and very tasty version.
Cheers!
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)From about.com:
The first thing to know about voilà is that it's spelled voilà. Please note that the grave accent on the a is obligatory. (See common misspellings at the end of this article.)
Secondly, voilà, which is a contraction of vois là (literally, "see there" , has varied uses and meanings, which are hard to define precisely, so I've provided numerous examples to help make the distinctions clear.
Spelling notes: Voilà is sometimes used in English, and for this reason it's often written voila. This is acceptable in English, which tends to lose accents on words borrowed from other languages, but it's not acceptable in French.
There are several other common misspellings: 1."Voilá" has the wrong accent. The only letter that ever has an acute accent in French is e, as in été (summer).
2."Viola" is a word, though not a French one: a viola is a musical instrument slightly larger than a violin; the French translation is viole.
3."Vwala" is an Anglicized spelling of voilà.
4."Walla"? Not even close. Please, use voilà
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)KaryninMiami
(3,073 posts)So hard to know who to trust any more or which companies are who they say they are...
K
hlthe2b
(102,294 posts)bbrady42
(175 posts)Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)I like to have a few things on the shelf that are ready at a moment's notice (I don't can lentil soup, for instance-but do all kinds of other things.)
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Canned food didn't used to need a liner to prevent corrosion inside the can because of cheap metal, which is why that liner was there. So now I buy more of the house brand at COSTCO in unlined cans.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)gateley
(62,683 posts)OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Conservatives just should NOT go into businesses where their customer base is predominantly liberal.
They will reveal themselves and fuck their business up most of the time.
Their values are the only true and real values - Don't cha know? *wink
Can anyone recommend any other good organic companies that aren't run by right wing freaks?
I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE Bob's Red Mill for so many reasons, and I love being able to give them my business.
Any other companies like Bob's Red Mill that are strongly leftist/liberal with their values?
babylonsister
(171,072 posts)tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)However, they should keep their mouth shut about it. The CEO of Whole Foods is another good example.
To use a non political example--- if you are the CEO of say Chuck E Cheese or Toys R Us and you hate kids, either STFU or find another company to work for.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)because of the soy milk being so low quality.
ananda
(28,866 posts)Eden makes the best black eyed peas on the market.
Maineman
(854 posts)get the red out
(13,466 posts)I have bought some of their products in the past, now they are on the "do not buy" list.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)was heavily involved in anti-gay Prop. 8 work in California.
otohara
(24,135 posts)I don't buy these tasty drinks too often...never again
MH1
(17,600 posts)I really like - make that liked - some of their products.
onestepforward
(3,691 posts)The sale was completed last August.
What a shame about one of the family members. I don't think some people realize just how much they taint their own products with ugly political views.
gtar100
(4,192 posts)Businesses should not be involved one iota with health care. But I'm sure having that form of control over people is just too good to pass up for some people.
Maineman
(854 posts)LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)When health care is about caring for the health of people, there's not very much profit in it.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)Thanks for saying it.
However I feel about Eden (and I have opinions, believe you me LOL) this is what it comes down to.
Whether it is Eden Foods or a catholic hospital trying to fight contraceptive coverage, or simply increased premiums and higher copays for workers at Acme Ltd or Smith & Jones whatnot factory, doesn't matter.
It shouldn't even be connected.
Health care for all.
Single payer now.
Because while some may choose to boycott Eden after this news, and rightly so, it will not accomplish the bigger picture of removing some CEO's moral objections to providing reproductive health care for women, or the OVERALL lack of affordable health care for so many working people in general. It is a consumer choice, not a political action. We need to stop conflating these things.
SINGLE PAYER NOW!!!
codemoguy
(36 posts)Employers offer group insurance as an incentive/benefit...an employee is always free to decline and get it elsewhere with less restrictions....some do.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Wrong messageboard.
MH1
(17,600 posts)The issue is that the employer can offer it so much cheaper than a person can get it individually, due to group discounts. However there is literally NO choice when looking at employer provided plans. So, if the ACA or follow on reforms institute means to close the pricing gap, many people like myself will be more inclined to shop outside of the employers' limited offerings.
Of course, in the current context you are right that it is a bullshit argument - it doesn't help Eden's employees that maybe someday they can find insurance outside the employer plan for a comparable price to them - but I don't think you can assume the poster is a troll (seeming implication of "wrong messageboard" for making a factual statement.
gtar100
(4,192 posts)employer's share. And I wouldn't be able to afford insurance again. They don't call the employer's portion "compensation" for a reason. And that is their hook into people's lives. So this libertarian utopia you allude to isn't possible. If the cost of health care were on the level that is deducted from my earnings, then it might be possible. But the amount is double that. But that's just me. It still doesn't address the needs of people who are now uninsured. And that is all because we tie health insurance with employment. A good system if the goal is to maximize profits, which is what we have now. But if you want as many people as possible to have health care, then no system is known that works better than single payer.
As you say, we have a choice to turn down an employer's insurance offer - those of us fortunate enough to be in such a position - but for the vast majority of insured workers, it's a false choice because there is no affordable alternative. That is where libertarian fantasies crumble under the cold realities of a system designed to protect the interests of the wealthy at the expense of the working class and unemployed.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)Maineman
(854 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,770 posts)RWer, no? My local overpriced health food store is owned by a fundy. I was stupidly shocked to discover this.
matt819
(10,749 posts)I didn't know that. There are choices in organic food. Eden, for me, is no longer one of them.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)They need to know.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)available in my area in winter. (I buy canned things that I don't can myself in winter. In summer, I have lots more options).
Thanks for posting this.
Signed,
-a former customer
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)I've guessing their food wasn't all that organic anyway, judging by their subterfuge--holding themsleves out as pro-environment organic save the planet types, while pushing their reich wing agenda. I feel I've been lied to, and that makes me not trust them about anything, including their product. Anyone who cozies up to right wing, climate change denying, anti-birth control world overpopulation policies cannot really believe in organics. It was just a money making scam. Buy local.
theglammistress
(348 posts)This is so frustrating. It is very hard to eat well anymore. Everything is packed full of chemicals. Or is GMO. Or is just plain junk. Then to find this out is disappointing.
I am a member of a CSA (community supported agriculture). I cook fresh/scratch/clean. Sometimes it is nice to buy something ready made. Oh well.
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)so that the court can SEE what they're talking about. I would allow them great latitude to do so. It is rank absurdity to spend hours debating and deciding a legal claim surrounding a piece of real estate for example when no one has proved in the first place that this disputed piece of land even exists! They can rely on Holy Mother Church to do the technical work to bring the soul of an embryo, zygote or fully grown person under the eyes of a court; they can even request the court to reconvene in a Catholic Church run laboratory where I'm sure they must keep all the necessary equipment to make souls visible and to assay their mass and density and so on. Since the Church has so much to say about souls, meeting this requirement can hardly pose much of a problem for them.
When and if Crunchy Granola Foods Co., and/or its friends from Rome, can make visible in court or in a laboratory the SOUL that they are talking about, so that statements can be made about it, which can be tested for their truth or falsehood, THEN I would consider seriously their claim that they are resisting their employees' urging to aid them in doing harm to living persons. Otherwise I would not waste a minute of my time on their claim. For if we were to grant them our belief otherwise, for no reason besides uncertainty or lack of proof one way or the other about the existence of the soul, then we would be obliged likewise to give the benefit of the doubt to someone who hunts and kills "witches" in the name of community safety, because we had no proof that there is no such thing as a witch. Produce the witch. Prove they exist. Produce the soul in court and prove it. Unless you have these things in hand and can demonstrate their existence you are asking courts to debase the logic of law to ooga booga.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Eden Foods, not the people that own or control it, is the complainant in this case, therefore, shouldn't Eden Foods prove that as a corporate entity that it is a member of, and practices a certain religion?
If the owners wish to sue, they can do so under their own names, but since their position is that their company is the aggrieved party, then the corporation must prove it is a church-going, devout Catholic that adheres to RCC doctrine and is a member of that faith in good standing.
MH1
(17,600 posts)I agree!
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Produce valid documantation in court to prove your assertations, or take a walk.
A baptismal certificate signed by a parish priest should suffice.
MH1
(17,600 posts)No copies !!1!
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)"What parish in Kenya is that?"
Cha
(297,323 posts)a long time.. But, this is good to know. Glad, they're not under the radar anymore.
thanks babylonsistah