Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OhioChick

(23,218 posts)
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 04:55 PM Apr 2013

Chuck Schumer: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Should Face Death Penalty

04/21/2013 1:23 pm EDT

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said federal prosecutors should seek the death penalty for Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

During a Sunday appearance on CNN's "State of the Union," Schumer was asked by host Candy Crowley whether Tsarnaev should face capital punishment if he is found guilty, even though it is banned in the state of Massachusetts.

"The federal law allows the death penalty," Schumer said, adding that he wrote that federal law in 1994 while chairing the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime.

"This is just the kind of case that it should be applied to," he said. "In fact, the only other time it's been used since '94 is on Timothy McVeigh. And given what I've seen, it would be appropriate to use the death penalty in this case, and I would hope they would apply it in federal court."

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, also said prosecutors should ask for a death sentence for Tsarnaev.

More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/21/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-death-penalty_n_3127642.html

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chuck Schumer: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Should Face Death Penalty (Original Post) OhioChick Apr 2013 OP
He deserves it but the death penalty is so wrong so I say no. hrmjustin Apr 2013 #1
I agree, life in prison in a very small cell alone is much worse to me nt steve2470 Apr 2013 #6
I agree! lastlib Apr 2013 #7
^^^Agreed!^^^ Junkpet Apr 2013 #29
I thought McVeigh exboyfil Apr 2013 #2
There may be a possibility of a federal charge. Mariana Apr 2013 #24
Maybe so, but why don't we try him first tularetom Apr 2013 #3
**DINGDINGDING!!!** WINNER!!! lastlib Apr 2013 #5
Politicians especially Canuckistanian Apr 2013 #23
I'm undecided. Yes, I want him dead and in hell. Time will see to that regardless. kestrel91316 Apr 2013 #4
The death penalty is barbaric. n/m Morning Dew Apr 2013 #8
Really? How 'bout some due process first? FourScore Apr 2013 #9
Of course he should. MrSlayer Apr 2013 #10
The death penalty is state sanctioned murder. Terra Alta Apr 2013 #11
Murder is unlawful killing FarCenter Apr 2013 #13
Yes, I agree. I do believe in the death penalty, RebelOne Apr 2013 #14
You know what would be even better? Seeing if he can face up to what he did and spend the rest of KittyWampus Apr 2013 #20
It's startling that both of them casually endorse state-sanctioned execution. closeupready Apr 2013 #12
But etiquette says torture him first jsr Apr 2013 #15
The death penalthy is 100% wrong 100% of the time Robyn66 Apr 2013 #16
I agree with the Senators. beyurslf Apr 2013 #17
If you oppose the death penalty, you don't make exceptions Hugabear Apr 2013 #18
Agreed. I oppose it without equivocation or hesitation. marmar Apr 2013 #21
Spot on! markpkessinger Apr 2013 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Apr 2013 #31
Let him live and perhaps someday understand his acts were harmful and wrong or kill him for revenge- KittyWampus Apr 2013 #19
I'm against the death penalty jessie04 Apr 2013 #25
Pretty much how I feel too leftynyc Apr 2013 #34
congress doesn't enforce law, they should stfu spanone Apr 2013 #26
Kick OhioChick Apr 2013 #27
Can we have a trial first? Blue_In_AK Apr 2013 #28
Impropriety, whether real or conceived... Junkpet Apr 2013 #30
Let the kill-'em-harder posturing begin! Orsino Apr 2013 #32
I say put a tracking device in him snooper2 Apr 2013 #33

Mariana

(14,858 posts)
24. There may be a possibility of a federal charge.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 07:39 PM
Apr 2013

In 2007, for example, Paul Ross Evans was convicted in federal court and sentenced to 40 years for building and placing a bomb at an abortion clinic in Austin, Texas.

http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/10676231.html

lastlib

(23,252 posts)
5. **DINGDINGDING!!!** WINNER!!!
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 05:26 PM
Apr 2013

Politicians need to stay the hell out of it and let the legal system take its course! It's gonna be hard enough to get an impartial jury to give the guy a fair trial, without their self-serving BS interjected!

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
23. Politicians especially
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 07:37 PM
Apr 2013

I remember when Nixon declared Charles Manson guilty in the middle of his trial. It almost caused a mistrial.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
4. I'm undecided. Yes, I want him dead and in hell. Time will see to that regardless.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 05:14 PM
Apr 2013

Do I want the taxpayers to have to pay the bill for the DP vs LWOP? NO.

Is the DP misused too often and wrongly convicted innocents executed? HELL yes.

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
9. Really? How 'bout some due process first?
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 05:32 PM
Apr 2013

Guilty via meadia grandstanding...Geez...I'm disappointed in Schumer and Feinstein. They should know better.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
10. Of course he should.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 05:32 PM
Apr 2013

This is an open and shut case, a model capital case. Oh, he'll still get his trial and all but there is no doubt of his guilt. Perry Mason couldn't get this guy off.

Maybe he can try to trade off information for his life but I'm betting he doesn't know a whole lot. The older brother seems to have been the connected one.

We'll see.

Terra Alta

(5,158 posts)
11. The death penalty is state sanctioned murder.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 05:32 PM
Apr 2013

What Tsarnaev did was wrong, and he should be locked up for the rest of his life for it. Killing him won't bring back the dead victims to life, or make the amputees magically regrow their limbs. Locking him in a tiny Supermax cell 23 hours a day for the rest of his life would be a far more appropriate punishment.

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
14. Yes, I agree. I do believe in the death penalty,
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 06:01 PM
Apr 2013

but I think that locking him up for the rest of his life would be a far better punishment because he is only 19, so he will definitely suffer behind bars for a long, long time.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
20. You know what would be even better? Seeing if he can face up to what he did and spend the rest of
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 07:30 PM
Apr 2013

his life locked up doing something to somehow give back to society.

I disagree with the death penalty and also locking people up to rot no matter what potential there is for some rehabilitation.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
12. It's startling that both of them casually endorse state-sanctioned execution.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 05:36 PM
Apr 2013

And very disappointing.

Capital punishment is always wrong.

Robyn66

(1,675 posts)
16. The death penalthy is 100% wrong 100% of the time
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 06:30 PM
Apr 2013

There is a part of me that cant help but feel for a 19 year old who made the choices this one did. Maybe I will lose all sympathy as this boy begins to speak, but there is something just so sad about him and about his life being over just as much as those he killed. He is only two years older than my daughter. Besides, I do not beleive in responding to murder with murder. There is more to this that we will learn and it is all very very sad.

marmar

(77,084 posts)
21. Agreed. I oppose it without equivocation or hesitation.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 07:34 PM
Apr 2013

There's no moral flexibility on this one.


markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
22. Spot on!
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 07:36 PM
Apr 2013

If you support the death penalty in an "easy" (in manner of speaking) case such as this one, then you should ask yourself how you feel about an indigent defendant served at trial by inexperienced or inadequate counsel, who gets railroaded by some local yokel district attorney for a crime he didn't commit. Because the hard truth of the matter is you don't get one without the other.

Response to Hugabear (Reply #18)

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
19. Let him live and perhaps someday understand his acts were harmful and wrong or kill him for revenge-
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 07:27 PM
Apr 2013

Death penalty is stupid.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
34. Pretty much how I feel too
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 03:41 PM
Apr 2013

I couldn't sit on the jury due to my position on the DP but I will lose no sleep over this one.

Junkpet

(40 posts)
30. Impropriety, whether real or conceived...
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 02:59 PM
Apr 2013

...is what the next anti-American terrorist cell is hoping for in this case, it's good for recruitment and motivation. The "martyrdom" of a "terrorist" is not beneficial. Let him rot and be forgotten about.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
33. I say put a tracking device in him
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 03:40 PM
Apr 2013

Drop him in the middle of Afghanistan and see how long he lasts...

See if the fundies take him in or reject him as a fake

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chuck Schumer: Dzhokhar T...