Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$6600 per FOOT! for a railroad line (Original Post) Chuuku Davis Apr 2013 OP
Where did you get this? Give us a link to read it all. freshwest Apr 2013 #1
lowest of five bids, way lower than expected Cicada Apr 2013 #2
Knowing it's high speed rail completely changes this story. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #7
Thank you very much Chuuku Davis May 2013 #20
"I have got to be missing something" RetroLounge Apr 2013 #3
That's a good price considering how many good paying middle class Union jobs it will support. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #4
Probably includes the civil engineering and site work too. n/t FSogol May 2013 #22
It's apparently the outrage du jour at certain RW sites Newsjock Apr 2013 #5
More Feinstein bashing, like Pelosi, Kennedy, etc. Same sources most likely. freshwest Apr 2013 #10
This OP is useless without some sort of factual perspective about the cost of building track. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #6
I know it's about 5k per parking space in a large lot aikoaiko Apr 2013 #8
Whatever puts more rails out there. onehandle Apr 2013 #9
That's actually not a bad price since it Warpy Apr 2013 #11
+1000 alittlelark Apr 2013 #12
IIRC 4 lanes was $1000 metre/yard about 20 years ago in Australia. TheMadMonk May 2013 #13
Facts, please. elleng May 2013 #14
I guess you're referring to this. bluedigger May 2013 #15
so is it true that feinstein's husband's firm got the contract? HiPointDem May 2013 #16
Then you have a big problem with URS. bluedigger May 2013 #21
That sounds surprisingly low Recursion May 2013 #17
What's the cost of a highway project-I doubt it's less. hobbit709 May 2013 #18
Republicans are very scared of trains. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #19
Didn't "Atlas Shrugged" tell them to love trains? FSogol May 2013 #23

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
1. Where did you get this? Give us a link to read it all.
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 11:07 PM
Apr 2013

Although it's not just rail, of course, so that figure may be about a lot more. If it's the high speed rail, that's a huge cost. Check out the ones in Japan and the EU. Technical wonders.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
2. lowest of five bids, way lower than expected
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 11:17 PM
Apr 2013

CA initially thought it would cost 2 billion. The winning bid is 900 million plus. Ten percent below next cheapest bid, 60% below highest bid. This is not a normal rail line - it's a line for high speed rail, more than 200 mph. Without this rail line CA would have to build additional urban airports which would cost so much this rail line is a massive money-saver even if it cost three times as much.

Chuuku Davis

(565 posts)
20. Thank you very much
Wed May 1, 2013, 07:29 AM
May 2013

I appreciate the real information instead of the coffee shop rumors I heard yesterday.
$550 per inch still sounds high to me but I am ignorant about such things

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
4. That's a good price considering how many good paying middle class Union jobs it will support.
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 11:19 PM
Apr 2013

That includes everything from manufacturing, trucking, & labor costs to install.

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
5. It's apparently the outrage du jour at certain RW sites
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 11:20 PM
Apr 2013

Shows up rather easy in teh google, but not from any legitimate news sites.

Oh, yeah, welcome to DU 'n stuff. Enjoy your ... stay.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
6. This OP is useless without some sort of factual perspective about the cost of building track.
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 11:21 PM
Apr 2013

Not being knowledgeable on the subject, I have absolutely no way to reference this. It could be high, it could be low or it could be just right.

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
11. That's actually not a bad price since it
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 11:47 PM
Apr 2013

involves purchasing the right of way, properly grading and surfacing the road bed, then putting down ties and steel rails.

How much would the Interstates cost to build now? My guess is that they wouldn't be that much cheaper.

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
13. IIRC 4 lanes was $1000 metre/yard about 20 years ago in Australia.
Wed May 1, 2013, 12:03 AM
May 2013

Don't think that included the right of way either.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
15. I guess you're referring to this.
Wed May 1, 2013, 03:01 AM
May 2013
Under a contract awarded by the California High-Speed Rail Authority, a URS joint venture is providing planning and engineering services for one third of a proposed 800-mile, high-speed rail system from San Francisco and Sacramento to San Diego. The system will be the largest public works project in California history.

URS and our partners are tasked with developing two contiguous segments of the system—from Fresno to Palmdale and from Palmdale to Los Angeles. As part of this work, we are responsible for defining the detailed design and construction requirements for the two segments. This includes planning for grade separations, crossings and bridges, as well as for more than 30 miles of tunnels and viaducts that will pass through the Tehachapi and San Gabriel mountain ranges in Southern California. In addition, URS is developing design concepts for the rail stations along these segments of the route—all of which will be multimodal transportation hubs with direct links to local and regional highways, airports and transit systems.

Also, we are identifying the agricultural, residential, industrial and recreational areas along the route to determine which alignments will have the least environmental impact. This includes studying the potential effects of train noise and vibration on people, buildings and the local ecology. A series of public meetings are being held to keep local communities informed about the various design concepts and any mitigation measures, which will be incorporated into the project to help protect the environment.http://www.urscorp.com/Projects/projView.php?s=926&pn=2&sec=14


It's a little more complicated than hiring a bunch of Chinese and Irish and giving them a bunch of dynamite and pick axes these days.
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
16. so is it true that feinstein's husband's firm got the contract?
Wed May 1, 2013, 03:11 AM
May 2013

personally, i have a problem with the family members of legislators getting government contracts, whatever the cost.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
21. Then you have a big problem with URS.
Wed May 1, 2013, 09:20 AM
May 2013

According to wiki they rank #14 in Federal contractors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_100_Contractors_of_the_U.S._federal_government

Another source has them at #43 in 2012.
http://washingtontechnology.com/toplists/top-100-lists/2012.aspx

Good luck finding legislators with no association whatsoever with government contractors. Maybe Bernie Sanders...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»$6600 per FOOT! for a rai...