General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsListen: Chris Hedges Interviews Julian Assange
Posted on May 5, 2013
... audio excerpts from their extended conversation in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London ...
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/listen_chris_hedges_interviews_julian_assange_20130505/
Assange, here, as we should expect by now, rather carelessly misrepresents a number of matters:
Lindskog's 3 April 2013 talk at the University of Adelaide actually ranged over various legal issues surrounding Assange and Sweden, including the problems Swedish transparency law creates with respect to keeping current police investigation documents out of the newspapers and the issue of Assange's possible extradition to the US from Sweden, which Lindskog regards as more or less impossible. Lindskog's comment "It's a mess" occurs a bit after the 0:46 mark in the video, and when he makes it, he has been talking extradition, not about the Swedish criminal case. (If you decide to follow the link to the videotape, you'll want to skip the first 14 minutes which mostly show audience wandering into the auditorium)
Assange -- who (of course) had earlier condemned Lindskog's talk as absolutely outrageous (see http://www.news.com.au/national-news/julian-assange-safe-from-extradition-to-us-says-justice-stefan-lindskog/story-fncynjr2-1226612062993) -- has by now had ample time to learn what Lindskog actually said, if he were interested in what Lindskog actually said
JA: If not, thered be one in the queue, and then the other one would come in, and then it would be the plight of the home secretary to make a decision, a reviewable court decision, a politically reviewable decision, to swap the precedent for these ...
US ambassador to the UK Louis Susman was on the 20 February 2011 Andrew Marr Show, and he said no such thing. Watch it yourself: the clip is only a bit over one minute
treestar
(82,383 posts)The ambassador says "we'll see" at most.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)I could actually pose as you, had I your password and the need to entertain myself in such a fashion.
struggle4progress
(118,320 posts)And treestar is right about the ambassador's remarks: watch the video
treestar
(82,383 posts)We have a pot and kettle situation here. But Julian is babbling nonsense there - what the heck does that statement mean? Is he attempting to claim the American Ambassador is saying we'll arrest him? Because the Ambassador does not say that.
Cha
(297,446 posts)Observation!
Thanks treestar!
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Your quote #1
JA: Politically, itsthe head of the Swedish Supreme Court came out and said that the case is a mess ...
That response was specific to Assange's extradition case not the criminal case. Here is the quote in context. (emphasis mine)
Chris Hedges: So what do you, when you watch all these sort of, you know, all this movement, what do you think theyre trying to do? How do they want to try and get you out of here?
Julian Assange: I think its a mess. I dont think that they havetheres so many different parties with different interests. Its a mess. The U.K. wants it to go away, but doesnt want to lose prestige in relation to Ecuador. The situation in Sweden is getting so bad now that
Sweden will never offend the U.S. Neither countryneither the U.K. or Sweden will ever offend the U.S. But within that, the situation is so bad now in Sweden
Your quote #2... I am not sure what you are claiming here. Of course the Susman said that the U.S. is waiting until after the Swedish case, a fact that both Assange and his assistant repeated. (For some reason, you messed with the sequence and put two sentences together that were separated by other comments in the interview).
In context:
JA: They dont need to.
We have some indications. The [then-U.S.] ambassador for the U.K., Louis Susman, said in the beginning of 2011 that they were waiting until after the Swedish case. The Independent [newspaper]
CH: Waiting for what?
JA: Whats the U.S. interest in this situation? Its up for my extradition. He didnt say that, but its the obvious context.
Assanges assistant: So the U.S. ambassador to the U.K. said early
JA: 2011.
Assanges assistant:
early 2011 that the U.S. was waiting to see what happened with the Swedish case.
Assanges attorney Michael Ratner: They wouldnt file at the same time, because then thered be two competing extraditionsand so they would wait until
CH: Oh, I see. OK, I got it.
JA: If not, thered be one in the queue, and then the other one would come in, and then it would be the plight of the home secretary to make a decision, a reviewable court decision, a politically reviewable decision, to swap the precedent for these.
MR: So what they would do, is if they were going to actually, if Julian had won a non-extradition, they would likely at that point in the U.K. court file their extradition.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)I keep running into this quote of Albert's over at Facebook, and today, I think it applies to Assange.
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly." ~ Albert Einstein
Zorra
(27,670 posts)from John Stuart Mill, as an afterthought ~
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative".
RetroLounge
(37,250 posts)Vary applicable to certain obsessed posters here in GD.
RL
struggle4progress
(118,320 posts)what would happen with the Swedish case before asking for Assange's extradition. He was asked for his own opinion about whether the US should prosecute Assange, in response to which he said something noncommittal (along the lines of on-the-one-hand-and-on-the-other-hand) before concluding with an entirely bland We'll just have to wait and see what happens
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)it plays out in the British courts."
As Assange noted at the time, "What does the United States have to do with a Swedish Extradition process?"
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)After all, the PTB have drones that can neutralize you and me and our little dog Toto too!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)I truly love this video, though. Go, Julian, Go!
Response to struggle4progress (Original post)
Post removed