Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NRaleighLiberal

(60,015 posts)
Tue May 7, 2013, 02:39 PM May 2013

An enlightening conversation with a friend who used to be HR director at a local news station...

I told him that the news is annoying, self promotional, spent too long on things that really didn't matter and glossed over with no depth those things that did.

His reply to me was "if you were impressed by the product, then they are doing it wrong - their main demographic is the low education public who don't spend a whole lot of time reading". It is not for the well informed - it is for the mostly uninformed. And think about how dangerous that is....

What prompted this is the long thread about Joe Scar - which is a touchy subject, because it is certainly an individual (and should be a respected) choice that each of us make as to whether to watch or not watch.

But I thought it would be interesting to share the intent/views of someone on the inside - we all can never, ever forget that no matter what we watch on the TV, there is likely a very specific intent - to either convince us to buy something or think a certain way.

And that, in a nutshell, is why we've decided to pretty much turn it off.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An enlightening conversation with a friend who used to be HR director at a local news station... (Original Post) NRaleighLiberal May 2013 OP
" ... it is for the mostly uninformed" lpbk2713 May 2013 #1
I don't think that's a fair comparison... brooklynite May 2013 #2
and what do you base your trust that the national cable channel is broadcasting NRaleighLiberal May 2013 #3
I don't assume ANY news is in the viewing public's best interest... brooklynite May 2013 #6
That's why we turned it off too magellan May 2013 #4
Our local Fox affiliate was actually pretty good for several years. The news director was a pistol. Brickbat May 2013 #5

brooklynite

(94,613 posts)
2. I don't think that's a fair comparison...
Tue May 7, 2013, 02:45 PM
May 2013

Yes, any advocacy message is intended to convince its audience, but I don't think you can fairly compare local TV news, and a national cable channel that specifically targets a politically engaged audience.

NRaleighLiberal

(60,015 posts)
3. and what do you base your trust that the national cable channel is broadcasting
Tue May 7, 2013, 02:53 PM
May 2013

news that is of the watching public's best interests?

I guess I am either very skeptical or well moved into cynical...but I don't trust any of them.

brooklynite

(94,613 posts)
6. I don't assume ANY news is in the viewing public's best interest...
Tue May 7, 2013, 02:55 PM
May 2013

I'll make my own decisions about what's in my interest, and that includes listening to voices that don't simply reinforce my own biases; something that Morning Joe does fairly well.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An enlightening conversat...