General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsU.S. Navy Spends $37 Billion On A Ship That Barely Works
The Littoral Combat Ship was supposed to anchor the Navy of the future. Instead, a report obtained by Bloomberg News reveals a program plagued by problems, high costs, and an inability to meet even simple docking requirements.
Ideally, the Littoral Combat Ship is one vessel that can transform to fulfill one of three roles at a time: anti-mine, anti-submarine, or ocean surface combat. To do this, it uses interchangeable modules, helicopters, unmanned underwater vehicles (sea drones!), and missiles, depending on the mission. In theory, the modules work like LEGOs, swapping out a sonar array from the anti-submarine kit for a 30mm gun in the surface warfare kit.
In practice, the modules don't work. The goal was for a 96-hour turnaround between modules in place and specific other tools needed (the above-mentioned helicopters, etc). A ship that adaptable and flexible could respond rapidly to a crisis. But the report obtained by Bloomberg reveals that while a 96-hour module exchange is technically possible, it requires a nearby dock, with all the components for the next module already on hand. That takes a lot of advance planning to set up and requires fetching spare modules from naval bases beforehand (a process that took weeks in a training exercise.)
The Littoral Combat Ship is also a far cry from durable. A more recent report says the ship is not expected to remain capable after taking a hit from an opponent, which is a significant problem for a naval vessel. Granted, it is not designed to carry on a full naval battle by itself, but it doesn't take an enemy warship to sink it. Instead, this $440 million ship can be knocked out of a fight by a single hostile cruise missile.
more
http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-05/us-navy-spends-37-billion-ship-that-barely-works
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Works beyond their wildest dreams transferring money from schools, roads, etc. and into the pockets of Lockheed Martin shareholders cough.
Sickening as it is.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)edhopper
(33,615 posts)inefficient, boondoggle ridden government that the Repukes rail against, Yet they love throwing money at it.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Guess our state's Republican Senators have brought home the bacon in contracts.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)"while a 96-hour module exchange is technically possible, it requires a nearby dock, with all the components for the next module already on hand."
, um, no shit--
And NASCAR pit crews can change 4 wheels and fuel a car in 12 seconds, but they have to have the gas and new tires on hand LOL
Have you seen the promotional video?
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)Quite honestly I couldn't figure out what they were saying. "Doesn't work" seems to be a reference to how long it takes to convert. Okay, right now it takes longer than 96 hours. I'd bet that has alot to do with the infrastructure, or lack thereof, for supporting these ships and their conversions. 96 hours is lightening speed. There are commercial container ships that spend that much time in port. Aircraft carriers spend WEEKS if not months in dock between deployments.
I'm sure this ship has its troubles, and I'm confident that it is riddled with problems that probably extend predominately from the "we can do it so we will do it" brand of DoD procurement. But I'll be damned if I can figure out from this article what the problems are.