General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAttention Boomers: The Economy Needs You To Work Past 70
Attention CNBC: The country needs you to zip it.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100724186
More working seniors also could lower demand for social services by cutting the number of Americans who don't have enough money in retirement. In 2008, the federal and state governments spent nearly $15,000 per elderly person on income security and tax credits, according to a report earlier this year from the Urban Institute. Every year that a person delays taking Social Security past his or her full retirement age (anywhere from age 65 to 67, depending on the date of birth), the check amount grows by 8 percent, says Sara Rix, who focuses on the economics of aging at AARP's Public Policy Institute....
But other experts worry that later retirement could shrink company bottom lines if the workers who stay do so because they don't have enough retirement savings. The typical household, age 55-64, had only $120,000 in their 401(k) or IRA account in 2010, according to a study last summer from Boston College's Center for Retirement Research. The report also noted that 13 percent of those ages 60-64 had no retirement account at all.
Those who feel obligated to keep working tend to have worse health and work in jobs that are more strenuous, compared with older knowledge workers who choose to keep going. Susan Conrad of Plancorp Retirement Plan Advisors says that among this group, health care, workers' compensation, and disability costs are higher than for others, while productivity is lower. A study by MassMutual Financial Group calculated that for companies with more than a thousand employees, increasing the portion of their workforce of those over age 60 from 10 percent to 30 percent hiked their health care and disabilities costs by about $2 million. Johnson also estimates that a company spends an average of about a thousand dollars more per year for an older worker.
Get a job, Grandma!
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I would think. As I approach the ability to retire, I find myself less willing to put up with crap. I'm afraid I may leave ahead of time and suffer the consequences. But at least I've saved....I could probably get by if I had to. But that's not the way I want to spend my future years: struggling to get by.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)I also don't have the same drive (or stamina) that I had say 20 years ago, so I'm sometimes lacking in motivation. I do think I'm getting to the point where it's time to go. At the same time, there's a part of me that is sad because my career is winding down. I've been truly blessed doing really interesting things and working with some great people - I will miss that. At the same time, there are a lot of things I've been looking forward to having more time to do. I'd say my feelings are a actually little mixed.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I'm anxious to go (I've got a little ways to go, yet, but not much), but OTOH, I like the social aspect of my job, self-esteem, the paycheck. I'll miss those things. But...being blamed for the boss's mistake, the bitch down the hall, the policies and rules and hoops I have to jump through for HR, having to get there at the same time every day, the stress of deadlines.....I just wanna walk out sometimes.
Maybe I need a day off.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)because if your much over 50 it's damned hard to get into a job, that doesn't make you eligible for SNAP and medicare.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)hired...she's also pushing 60.
My co. hired a number of workers last year who were over 40, and some were over 50.
If I had to guess, it's a combination of factors. First and foremost, it helps to have a specific job skill or vocation or profession. So the years of experience have some value...you're not a working class worker competing for jobs with 20 year olds, and which may require a level of physicality that older workers might not have. I was competing with maybe anyone from 35 to 45. I got the job at 58. I am very lucky.
The one pushing 60 who was just hired had been unemployed for months. She feels lucky, I'm sure, to have finally gotten a job. They hired her after the young gal who had that job quit after a few months. She has a specific job title and skill set, like I do. So that helps.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)They snap 'em up at reduced salaries, taking advantage of the worker's circumstances (laid off, wanting to change but not having many offers, whatever). But hey, that's the way it works. If it's an employee's market, we sure ask for higher wages. Still, it's kinda sad they do that.
Think about it from the company's point of view. They get all that experience, at a reduced cost. There is less down time for training new workers. Some of them don't work out, but some do. They don't miss Mondays cause they were out partying all weekend, they don't take maternity leave, they're more reliable than younger workers in many respects, they're more grateful for the job, they stay longer, and they tend to have an old-fashioned work ethic. It's a win-win.
Sure they don't have some things the younger ones do. Mainly perfect health. There is that detriment to hiring older. Once you hit 50 you're more likely to get all sorts of ailments. But no employee is perfect.
It's unusual that my company does that. I don't know if it's a policy (that would be reverse age discrimination, I guess), or if it just happens that way. They're also more willing to give an older, laid off worker a chance. We just hired an older woman who'd been unemployed for 6 mos after being laid off. No employment agency in town would even waste their time with her. So she hired one on the internet from out of town. And boom...my company hired her after a young perky gal didn't want to do the work (she had valid points...nothing agains the young gal), so left after a few months to be a stay at home mom. The older worker is very grateful to have gotten the job. I hope things work out for her.
They just hired me last year at age 58.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)cracks me up. Hoo hoo!
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)I'm 61 and I've been looking for work for more than 4 1/2 years.
How can I work past 70 if I can't find work in the first place?
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)A lot of companies won't hire older workers, or won't hire workers who have been laid off, whatever their age.
Certain things help. I changed jobs at age 58. But I was surprised I was able to find a new job at that age. Because I know companies don't like to hire older workers, generally. I found one that does, though. They snap 'em up at reduced salaries and get the benefit of all that experience. Look at me and the bargain they got. I took a large paycut...and I'm healthier than most young workers I know. My weight is normal, I don't smoke, I've learned how to get along with people, I cost them nothing in ins. claims, I rarely miss work, and I've got years of experience.
But the change was traumatic, and why I changed. I sure didn't want a big paycut at my age. But I had to change, I felt. And I was very lucky to get a new job.
So it helps to be, and LOOK, healthy and younger than you are. They won't know you're over 60 unless you look it or act it. Walk with some energy, make sure your cheeks look rosy and youthful. Impressions are important. I wouldn't be surprised if my employer was surprised to find out how old I am, after they hired me. But they certainly knew I was at least 50, since I was at my prior co. for 25 years.
llmart
(15,552 posts)trying to convince seniors to work until they drop or to delay taking Social Security. I'm working because I have to to pay my bills but I took my Social Security at age 63. Most everyone I know has taken theirs as early as possible because they no longer have full time jobs.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)But I also started collecting SS when I was 65.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)I already have my retirement plans set. I'm going retire so I can spend more time overthrowing the capitalist economic system.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Merlot
(9,696 posts)and free up jobs for younger people who are starting out, paying off student loans, buying houses etc. The younger people would have a large impact on the economy. If people over, say 55, who wanted to retire could actually afford it, they could spend their time doing volunteer work, with family, etc. Things that would also be good for the economy.
Besides, as others have noted, you don't much find jobs when you're over 50, unless you're a CEO of a larger company. Then you stay there until you die.
Raine
(30,540 posts)make those who have reaped the most from this country pay back some of what they were rewarded with.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)it 'needs' more revenue for.........
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)(as you'll soon discover, since it won't give you any) it just wants to give your retirement $$ away to the 1%
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)off their older workforce. Cooperation can't come just from workers.
dflprincess
(28,082 posts)because if I do it means about $700 more a month in my Social Security check. (Per what SSA estimates my benefits will be)
mia
(8,362 posts)I'd like to keep on working well beyond 70 if possible.
pnwmom
(108,992 posts)I guess they don't matter.
doc03
(35,364 posts)don't intend to start again. Retirement is the best job I ever had.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)mia
(8,362 posts)I'm strong and healthy and love being part of the community. I know that I'm lucky and am thankful for it.