Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 12:47 PM Feb 2012

STOCK Act passed by House by vote of 417-2

The House on Thursday joined the Senate in overwhelmingly approving a congressional insider-trading ban.

Now the question is whether the two chambers can make a deal — or whether they’ll find a way to stall over details and prevent a bill from reaching President Barack Obama’s desk

Both measures passed overwhelmingly — 417-2 in the House and 96-3 in the Senate last week — but the bills differ in some respects.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) had released several changes to the STOCK Act earlier this week that broadened the bill’s disclosure requirements and insider-trading ban to the executive branch and ensured that lawmakers convicted of a crime couldn’t collect their pensions.

*snip*

The two “no” votes Thursday were by Reps. John Campbell (R-Calif.) and Rob Woodall (R-Ga.)

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72670.html#ixzz1lu77GB00

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
STOCK Act passed by House by vote of 417-2 (Original Post) one_voice Feb 2012 OP
Nice way to separate yourself fools!!!!! Broderick Feb 2012 #1
I think that probably one of the reasons why this was able to pass zbdent Feb 2012 #2
Criminal politicians will oversee themselves, LOL just1voice Feb 2012 #3
Exactly. SammyWinstonJack Feb 2012 #4

Broderick

(4,578 posts)
1. Nice way to separate yourself fools!!!!!
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 12:49 PM
Feb 2012

That is intended to be towards Reps. John Campbell (R-Calif.) and Rob Woodall (R-Ga.) !!!

Maybe they need some investigating done on them.

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
2. I think that probably one of the reasons why this was able to pass
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 01:14 PM
Feb 2012

was that the "liberally-biased media" successfully tied this to Nancy Pelosi ... every time I heard about it, it was "Nancy Pelosi's husband" this and "Nancy Pelosi's husband" that ...

edited to add: I'm surprised that Nancy Pelosi didn't vote against it ... NOT!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»STOCK Act passed by House...