Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
Wed May 22, 2013, 10:55 AM May 2013

NASA awards grant for 3-D food printer; could it end world hunger?

Call it food for thought. Or perhaps thought for food: NASA has given a six-month grant to a company developing what could be the world’s first 3-D food printer. And the project’s developer, reports Quartz, an online digital news site, believes the invention could be used to end world hunger.

Quartz explains that the printer is the brainchild of mechanical engineer Anjan Contractor. Being developed by Contractor’s company, Systems & Materials Research Corp., it will use proteins, carbohydrates and sugars to create edible food products.

Contractor says one of his primary motivations is a belief that food will become exponentially more expensive in the near future. The average consumer, he told Quartz, will need a more economically viable option.

Some alternative food source options that may be used with the printer include algae, duckweed, grass, lupine seeds, beet leaves and even insects, according to TNO Research, which is working with Contractor on the project.

“I think, and many economists think, that current food systems can’t supply 12 billion people sufficiently,” said Contractor. “So we eventually have to change our perception of what we see as food.”

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/nasa-awards-grant-3d-food-printer-could-end-194050661.html

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NASA awards grant for 3-D food printer; could it end world hunger? (Original Post) cynatnite May 2013 OP
Why use a printer to take duckweed and shape it into a leg of lamb? Buzz Clik May 2013 #1
aahh the replicator warrior1 May 2013 #2
That did cross my mind when I read this. n/t cynatnite May 2013 #3
While I thought of C-H-O-N food, kentauros May 2013 #10
But will the Monsanto chemicals be there newfie11 May 2013 #4
Does someone think that a multi-thousand dollar machine Bay Boy May 2013 #5
And who could possibly believe this expensive machine will be used to make food for poor Nay May 2013 #17
I believe Contractor is looking toward the future siligut May 2013 #20
And when those "tons of food" start disappearing and the price starts going up SomethingFishy May 2013 #24
Out of thin air? No. Out of Carbohydrates and proteins.. SomethingFishy May 2013 #23
Or, maybe, stop destroying the land? (nt) scarletwoman May 2013 #36
Maybe they could concoct some Soylent Green? gordianot May 2013 #6
Not very energy efficient. We already have devices for kestrel91316 May 2013 #7
Livestock is a chore is space. Bluenorthwest May 2013 #11
Lol newfie11 May 2013 #12
I hope they go light on the carbs. nt naaman fletcher May 2013 #8
Sure, just insert this $30,000 food cartridge and you can print 100 loaves of bread! denverbill May 2013 #9
can we lace the food with a sterilizing agent? galileoreloaded May 2013 #13
tea, earl gray, hot n/t yodermon May 2013 #14
You'll get a substance that's almost, but not quite entirely, unlike tea. n/t backscatter712 May 2013 #25
/thread... SidDithers May 2013 #28
We'll make this planet uninhabitable long before we hit 12 billion. kestrel91316 May 2013 #15
Yes, that too. Let's stop asking this question: "How can we feed 12 (14, 18, 200) billion people" Nay May 2013 #18
Who is "we"? Warren DeMontague May 2013 #27
I didn't know you could eat plastic ... Bake May 2013 #16
Call me an outlier, but I prefer the soylent blue. lumberjack_jeff May 2013 #19
Wow. Reminded of Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age Matariki May 2013 #21
Lots of kneejerk responses to this technology Orrex May 2013 #22
And this is surprising why? Warren DeMontague May 2013 #26
I can think of a brazilian reasons it might work, but first, can you tell madinmaryland May 2013 #32
To quote Lewis Black: Initech May 2013 #29
I'll have two slices with extra protein layer, please KamaAina May 2013 #30
Hate to be a Debbie Downer and all that... derby378 May 2013 #31
Yep. The war for water is going to kill us all before that. cliffordu May 2013 #33
End world hunger? In a word... nnnnnnnnope. cherokeeprogressive May 2013 #34
Would you eat that shit? I sure wouldn't eat that shit. scarletwoman May 2013 #35
I suppose it would depend on how hungry you were... cynatnite May 2013 #37
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
1. Why use a printer to take duckweed and shape it into a leg of lamb?
Wed May 22, 2013, 10:58 AM
May 2013

No one will be better nourished.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
10. While I thought of C-H-O-N food,
Wed May 22, 2013, 11:11 AM
May 2013

i.e., Frederik Pohl's Heechee story Gateway and the discovery of the food factory converting Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Nitrogen into food

Nay

(12,051 posts)
17. And who could possibly believe this expensive machine will be used to make food for poor
Wed May 22, 2013, 01:37 PM
May 2013

and hungry people? We have tons of real food, right here, right now, and the reason it doesn't get fed to the people who are hungry is because THEY HAVE NO MONEY TO PAY FOR IT. That's the only reason.

siligut

(12,272 posts)
20. I believe Contractor is looking toward the future
Wed May 22, 2013, 01:46 PM
May 2013
“I think, and many economists think, that current food systems can’t supply 12 billion people sufficiently,” said Contractor. “So we eventually have to change our perception of what we see as food.”


The distant future.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
24. And when those "tons of food" start disappearing and the price starts going up
Sat May 25, 2013, 05:18 PM
May 2013

that's really going to help the poor

How anyone could think this is a bad thing is beyond me.

Yeah we should just use that money for more drones and then we can start killing people when there is not enough food anymore.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
23. Out of thin air? No. Out of Carbohydrates and proteins..
Sat May 25, 2013, 05:16 PM
May 2013

And I find it odd that many people are making fun of this. The truth is, in the near future humans will not be sustainable if we keep heading in the direction we are going. We need to come up with some way to make food as we are destroying the land needed to grow it.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
7. Not very energy efficient. We already have devices for
Wed May 22, 2013, 11:05 AM
May 2013

converting inedible (to humans) biological materials into edible food. They are called livestock.

Talk about reinventing the wheel. And all with an eye toward making somebody very rich at the expense of the already poor.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
11. Livestock is a chore is space.
Wed May 22, 2013, 11:13 AM
May 2013

The cattle keep drifting away in the low gravity while they look for pastures to graze in.

denverbill

(11,489 posts)
9. Sure, just insert this $30,000 food cartridge and you can print 100 loaves of bread!
Wed May 22, 2013, 11:06 AM
May 2013

Gee this project seems like a real winner. I don't know how you can possibly 'print' food less expensively than you can grow and ship it.

 

galileoreloaded

(2,571 posts)
13. can we lace the food with a sterilizing agent?
Wed May 22, 2013, 11:27 AM
May 2013

the last thing we need is to boost carrying capacity even further.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
15. We'll make this planet uninhabitable long before we hit 12 billion.
Wed May 22, 2013, 12:32 PM
May 2013

We need to stop with this idiotic idea that we can just keep reproducing exponentially with no consequences.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
18. Yes, that too. Let's stop asking this question: "How can we feed 12 (14, 18, 200) billion people"
Wed May 22, 2013, 01:39 PM
May 2013

and start asking "How can we humanely reduce the population of the planet with the least disruption/destruction of human beings?"

Orrex

(63,225 posts)
22. Lots of kneejerk responses to this technology
Wed May 22, 2013, 01:57 PM
May 2013

I'm glad that we're all focused on the limitations and shortcomings while dismissing possible benefits.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
26. And this is surprising why?
Sat May 25, 2013, 05:23 PM
May 2013

MONSANTO WILL BE 3D PRINTING DRONES TO PORNIFY TWITTER FACEBOOK APPLE CAN'T PROGRAM MY REMOTE AND I MISSED THE MENTALIST AND WHY DO THINGS HAVE TO CHANNNNNNGE??!?>!?!?!?!?



...in other words, welcome to DU.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
32. I can think of a brazilian reasons it might work, but first, can you tell
Sat May 25, 2013, 07:16 PM
May 2013

me HOW MUCH IS A BRAZILIAN???

Initech

(100,105 posts)
29. To quote Lewis Black:
Sat May 25, 2013, 05:49 PM
May 2013

"I've seen how this ends. And it ends with Chartlon Heston running down the street screaming Soylent Green is PEOPLE!!!!"

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
30. I'll have two slices with extra protein layer, please
Sat May 25, 2013, 05:52 PM
May 2013
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2013/0521/NASA-funds-3-D-pizza-and-chocolate-printer

NASA has doled out a research grant to develop a prototype 3D printer for food, so astronauts may one day enjoy 3D-printed pizza on Mars...

To prove his idea works, Contractor printed chocolate. Now, he's aiming to build a more advanced prototype to print a pizza, according to Quartz.

The system will start by "printing" a sheet of dough, followed by a layer of tomato "sauce," which will consist of the powder mixed with water and oil. Instead of traditional toppings, the 3D-printed pizza will be finished off with a layer of protein, which can be derived from animals, milk or plants, Contractor told Quartz.




edit: "sauce"! Then again, right here on Earth, your grocer's freezer contains "Pizza & Wyngz" (sic).

derby378

(30,252 posts)
31. Hate to be a Debbie Downer and all that...
Sat May 25, 2013, 06:15 PM
May 2013

...but long before the global population reaches 12 billion, I predict someone is going to launch nukes. It'll be a war over natural resources and raw materials, and it's going to be very short and it will suck really hard.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
35. Would you eat that shit? I sure wouldn't eat that shit.
Sat May 25, 2013, 08:06 PM
May 2013

And I find it incredibly offensive if these brainiacs think that they could feed that shit to poor people. You KNOW that rich people won't be eating that shit!

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
37. I suppose it would depend on how hungry you were...
Sat May 25, 2013, 08:13 PM
May 2013

I think if we were in the position of starvation that so many people around the world are in, we'd probably be surprised at what people would eat if it meant saving their lives.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NASA awards grant for 3-D...