Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn analogy: some bankers have committed crimes...
... to expose that, I will release the name, account number, and SSN of everyone who has initiated an FDIC-insured banking transaction in the past 3 years.
I'm a whistleblower, right?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 869 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An analogy: some bankers have committed crimes... (Original Post)
Recursion
Jun 2013
OP
You wouldn't be "aiding the enemy" which is what Bradley Manning is accused of
Eric J in MN
Jun 2013
#1
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)1. You wouldn't be "aiding the enemy" which is what Bradley Manning is accused of
... by the US government.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)2. Nope. Treason is not an enumerated charge
Unless they have amended.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)3. Manning is charged with "aiding the enemy," Al Qaeda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_charges_against_Bradley_Manning#Additional_Charge_1:_Violation_of_UCMJ_Article_104_.28Aiding_the_enemy.29
Additional Charge 1: Violation of UCMJ Article 104 (Aiding the enemy) [edit]Spec. 1: Knowingly giving intelligence to the enemy through indirect means
Additional Charge 1: Violation of UCMJ Article 104 (Aiding the enemy) [edit]Spec. 1: Knowingly giving intelligence to the enemy through indirect means
Recursion
(56,582 posts)4. Thank you. That is new since they first filed
It was originally just dissemination and hacking
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)5. He would, however, be indirectly supplying that data to identity thieves
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)6. ...including identity thieves who belong to Al Qadea...
...but that doesn't mean that he should be charged with "aiding the enemy" when his motivation wasn't to help Al Qaeda.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)7. Can you show me any name released by Manning to make this analogy sound?
The analogy has millions of names and other identifiers being released. Can you show that even one name was released to the public via Manning? Any identification of any kind? Because if you can't, then this is not an analogy at all, not just a bad one, it isn't one.