General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInternet threads from 40 years in the future.
Let me start with this one. About some unnamed government overreach.
"Jesus! They're getting as bad as the NSA!"
"Really, that's uncalled for. Nobody's as bad as the NSA!"
"Yeah, fuck you for comparing our government to America's! There's no way we're that bad!"
"Leave it to some douchebag to Fedwin the thread. This discussion's over!"
donco
(1,548 posts)pennant for the Cubs.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)The notions of privacy that fuel this controversy are a historically specific and contingent creation, always subject to change. Indeed, they're of fairly recent vintage, historically speaking. "Privacy" itself has already changed a great deal since its early uses in modernity. In 40 years, it will be a historical relic. It probably already is. We allow massive amounts of information about ourselves to circulate. We also learn that it's not the end of the world: we're not yeoman farmers, isolated upon the land. Privacy was invented, and largely in that context. It will be transformed utterly by our new archiving and data analysis capacities. We subject ourselves to big data algorithms all day long. Nobody blinks at the very notion of search engine optimization, or even the far more specific information collected every second we engage online, on our phones, in public spaces, through toll plazas. You think a notion of privacy invented in the 19th century will survive that? It's just a fucking utterly silly notion. In 40 years, there will be completely transformed understandings of the self. Not this ridiculous nostalgia all the time, but actual fruitful approaches to the big data age.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)oh how exciting for all of us.