Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 12:20 PM Jun 2013

Keystone and the Clintons.

So there is no misunderstanding now or down the road ... I hope the president nixes this project but I have no idea what he will do. He's being pressed by the GOP and corporate Democrats on one side and environmentalists and progressives on the other.

Bill Clinton advising Democrats to "embrace the Keystone pipeline:



Hillary's Crony Lobbyist Problem:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brendan-demelle/hillary-clintons-keystone_b_997523.html



20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,627 posts)
1. These are so perfect for the Keystone debate!
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 12:51 PM
Jun 2013

A lot of information is contained in these two graphics. Anyone wanting to know more would do well to study them thoroughly.

K&R

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
3. It's the State Department that Recommends and Obama then signs off on it?
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 01:03 PM
Jun 2013

I know we were worried about Hillary but now it's Kerry that will recommend...but if Kerry refused to sign off on it...Could Obama then counter him? Anyone know answer.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
6. Obama can accept or reject Kerry's reccomendation.
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 01:56 PM
Jun 2013

As with anything, Obama makes the final decision on anything in the executive branch.

I hope that Kerry stays true to who he is and rejects the report. The report ASSUMES away most of the impacts of the project. The key assumption is that the tar sand oil will be produced in the same quantity, with of without the pipeline - so NO estimate is included reflecting that it is far dirtier than other oils. I know nothing of the project, but simple basic economics would challenge that. The pipeline would provide them with the cheapest way to transport the oil to where it will be refined and then sent out. If it is disallowed, the total cost of providing the oil increases by the difference between using something else. This means the break even point (where you still profit) shifts - and some oil becomes uneconomic to recover.

I hope that one of the environmental groups that both John and Teresa Kerry have been involved with for decades persuades him (or Teresa, if he can't) to go see one of the areas where there have been tar sand spills. Anyone who read the Kerry's book (This moment on earth) knows that almost more than climate change, they have been involved with clean water, clean air issues. This pipeline increases the risk that there will be these ecological disasters in the US. We bear the risk - and almost all the gain goes to a Canadian company. Are we requiring they buy a reasonable amount of insurance to insure that for all time they bear the brunt of any spill?

The problem is that this may in fact be a done deal. Obama, before Kerry was in, allowed the bottom part of the pipeline to be put in. I have no idea where this leaves the US, Canada and the company if the project is completely rejected. It is almost like a breach of faith.

I hope that Kerry recognizes that he can use his own judgment and if Obama disagrees, so be it. There are plenty of precedents where Presidents overrule the advice of their Secretaries of State. A big historical one was Truman siding with the creation of Israel, when SOS George Marshall recommended against it - and more recently rejecting Clinton's and Petraeous' proposal to arm Syrian rebels.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
11. Thanks for the info. I do remember the Kerry's being very conscious
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 04:03 PM
Jun 2013

of food and water quality, so I hope he will be against it. That would make it a harder call for Obama though. But, I guess it would cover the pro's and con's backlash, politically.

I'm totally against these pipelines and fracking, also.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
12. Kerry voted against it in the Senate
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 05:09 PM
Jun 2013

I seriously doubt that he would personally be for it. My concern is that he is intensely loyal but, I don't see how his decision helps or hurts Obama whichever way he goes. (ie a JK yes doesn't mean a BO yes would be accepted any better or worse - and a JK no does not hurt Obama if he wants to approve it any more than had JK approved it. The one exception is if JK says no and makes an incredibly compelling case - which he has the ability to do - why that is the right decision. Then he genuinely helps Obama saying no. But it unfortunately looks very rigged.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
4. What the fuckity-fuck do these people NOT realize about fossil-fuels????
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 01:11 PM
Jun 2013


Big Dog is going to have grandchildren someday. Does he NOT realize his approval of Keystone will affect them negatively?

Are donations to the CGI more important than them??????
 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
5. K&R
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 01:34 PM
Jun 2013

A perfect example how the Clintons use their elected powers for personal gain for themselves and their 1%ers then have their suroggates and the media mewl about how wonderfully humanitarian they are and shucks aren't they brilliant.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
7. Is Obama with the lobbyists or with us? Duh!
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 01:59 PM
Jun 2013

And those who keep singing "Hillary 2016" just keep wanting to bury their heads in the sand. The Clinton dynasty is just the left-speaking version of the bush dynasty. They're ALL in the same bed.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
8. One can only assume that you are asking a rhetorical question given the evidence.
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 02:08 PM
Jun 2013

Triangulating (aka pandering) to the the right is a hallmark of the 3rd Way, New Democrat, DLC, "bi-partisan", agenda of both the Clinton and Obama administrations.

Uncle Joe

(58,364 posts)
20. One of the best things about being a former President, you can say whatever the heck you want"
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 10:56 PM
Sep 2015

"One of the saddest thing about being a former President is that nobody necessarily cares what you say."

I imagine that some people cared, particularly those closest to the former President.

Thanks for the thread, Atomic Kitten.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Keystone and the Clintons...