Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 05:30 PM Feb 2012

A great example of Republicans serving their own interests and ignoring ours

This eye-testing mandate for kids looks bad
Kansas City Star Editorial

For an ugly vision of how Missouri’s Capitol operates, look no further than the current push to renew an expensive and unnecessary mandate requiring eye exams for children entering public school.

This mandate has been around since 2007. But families are allowed to opt out, and most do. Exams by optometrists cost about $100, and private insurance plans generally won’t cover them.

Now, a bill to renew the mandate is being fast-tracked through the House. The process reeks for multiple reasons. To cite a few:

House Speaker Steve Tilley assigned the bill to a friendly committee while bottling up a better bill proposing that the state drop the exam requirement and increase resources for vision screenings by school nurses. Tilley, a Republican from Perryville, is hardly neutral in the matter. He is a practicing optometrist and the recipient of $10,000 in donations from the Missouri Optometric Association last year.




Read more here: http://voices.kansascity.com/entries/eye-testing-mandate-kids-looks-bad/#storylink=cpy

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A great example of Republicans serving their own interests and ignoring ours (Original Post) proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 OP
I am shocked — shocked— to find that gambling is going on in here! LadyHawkAZ Feb 2012 #1
Tilley is just a concerned eye doctor who ran for office so he could help liberal N proud Feb 2012 #2
So typical of many politicians, weasel your way into office for personal financial gain. RKP5637 Feb 2012 #3
No, he's helping children! proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #4
Typical unfunded mandate. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2012 #5
All of our schools have nurses proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #6
Who pays for the glasses? What if the parents can't afford them? Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2012 #7
At my school, we have partnerships proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #8

liberal N proud

(60,346 posts)
2. Tilley is just a concerned eye doctor who ran for office so he could help
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 05:46 PM
Feb 2012

Fatten his own wallet.

Prime example of the way greed is driving America.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
5. Typical unfunded mandate.
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 05:58 PM
Feb 2012

Kids need eye exams to detect problems and even if they just need glasses.
When I was little, the school nurse was about fifteen feet away with a light box and class was going on at the same time in the classroom. She said to point which direction the Es were facing. I kept saying quietly "I can't see that" about fifty times.

Nobody heard me. I say that the idea that the school nurse catches most eye problems is bullshit. A lot of schools don't even have a school nurse anymore.

In second grade, my mom finally took me to an eye doctor. She wondered why I always had my nose stuck in a book. She found out that I was quite nearsighted, and she felt stupid. She said "We thought you would tell us". Then how is a kid supposed to know they can't see? I certainly did not know.

I had a cousin who was put in slow classes all the way through high school. Her parents were schoolteachers. Finally in high school they found out she had a pointy cornea and that's why she couldn't see. She eventually got a corneal transplant.

Now if this stuff happens to kids in middle-class families, I can imagine how much worse it is in lower income families. The Repubs had better damn well fund exams and eyeglasses for the kids if they are going to mandate it.

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
6. All of our schools have nurses
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 06:04 PM
Feb 2012

I believe they legislated that a couple years ago.

Also the eye exams are done individually by the nurse in her office and we also have a team that comes once a year for individual vision and hearing screenings.

So in this state, the school really can take care of this. There is no reason to mandate a $100+ exam that most insurance plans don't cover.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
7. Who pays for the glasses? What if the parents can't afford them?
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 06:18 PM
Feb 2012

I have always thought that insurance companies were bastards, especially because they do not pay for eyeglasses or dental work. I literally cannot function without my glasses on. They are on the nightstand within arm's reach when I am sleeping. They are on my face when I'm vertical. And there are millions more just like me, or who are even more nearsighted than I am. The focal distance in my GOOD eye is about six inches.

And dental problems can kill you -- see the kids that have abscessed teeth and die from a massive systemic infection.


proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
8. At my school, we have partnerships
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 06:32 PM
Feb 2012

with several area places, LensCrafters, WalMart, etc. We can almost always get glasses for kids who can't afford them.

Schools are beginning to build dental clinics. You're right - that's a huge problem. Many dentists won't take pediatric Medicaid patients.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A great example of Republ...