General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAngry White Guy...
the newest game on phones across the California, NYC, Chicago and Mass....
You try to shoot an Angry White Guy across the river of reality into never was land...
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)And their reaction would be justified.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)That may detest the views of Republicans and other "angry white men", but we still recognize that shooting them in Un-American.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)Not shooting them but shooting them across...
I guess you would not approve of angry birds as well.
It's a characture.
Did you actually think I would shoot people?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Shooting people across the river, okay. I'm not going to deny my Angry Birds addiction . I still think it's in bad taste, but to each his own, I guess.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)But the never was land was pretty good, you got to admit...
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,841 posts)WCGreen
(45,558 posts)I just thought it fit in well with Angry Bird, Angry White Guys...
I probably should have made the connection better although I don't think that anyone who knew me would suggest that I was being literal.
provis99
(13,062 posts)I don't like this at all.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)I prefer to watch them self-destruct.
bluerum
(6,109 posts)WCGreen
(45,558 posts)But I think someone could do it up as a mock out of Angry Birds..
renie408
(9,854 posts)I think this is funny. Hell, I would think it was funny if they invented a version of GTA that was like this. I would love to vent some frustration by virtually shooting Angry White Guys.
I am woefully unevolved.
flexnor
(392 posts)the titile is a quote of the above post
is this kind of thing really accepted on this forum?
i think the operating assumption is 'everyone knows what i really mean, and so it's ok'. That's a really dangerous assumption, and a lot of people will see it as blatent hypocrisy
but if anyone made that remark above, with any other race, they would be instantly banned, and nobody would dispute it (including me)
renie408
(9,854 posts)I was thinking 'Angry White Guys' aka Rush, Newt, Glenn, etc. It seemed obvious to me who the poster was referring to and that they didn't REALLY want to shoot anybody, so I took it for the joke it was intended to be.
flexnor
(392 posts)'tolerance' is best taught by example
no matter how much you hate the student
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)That was what I was playing on...
flexnor
(392 posts)for a faction unfavored by your group, then it's 'ok'?
is that what you're saying?
'it's different when WE do it' is a very slippery slope, and you lose the respect of bystanders very quickly
this kind of stuff alienates the hell out of independents
and stricly speaking, it's a TOS violation 'promoting racial stereotypes' - but i'm not going to be the one to alert it, because i just want to see people's reaction to this
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)WCGreen
(45,558 posts)I was trying to play off the angry bird came where people sling shot an angry bird at targets.