Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNSA: Thank you Democrats Wyden and Udall: NSA takes surveillance fact sheets off website
NSA takes surveillance fact sheets off websiteBy ALEX BYERS |
6/25/13 8:37 PM EDT
Following a complaint from two senators, the National Security Agency has removed from its website two fact sheets designed to shed light on and defend a pair of surveillance programs. Users now trying to access the documents detailing surveillance under legal authorities known as Section 215 and Section 702 receive an error message when they try to load the fact sheets.
On Monday, Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.) wrote to the head of the spy agency alleging that one of the documents was misleading and inaccurate. The senators claimed, without elaborating, that a fact sheet contains an inaccurate statement about how the section 702 authority has been interpreted by the U.S. government.
NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander responded to the two lawmakers Tuesday, and while he didn't admit inaccuracy, he said the documents could have been clearer.
"After reviewing your letter, I agree that the fact sheet that the National Security Agency posted on its website on 18 June 2013 could have more precisely described the requirements for collection under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act," Alexander said in a letter of his own (posted here).
On Monday, Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.) wrote to the head of the spy agency alleging that one of the documents was misleading and inaccurate. The senators claimed, without elaborating, that a fact sheet contains an inaccurate statement about how the section 702 authority has been interpreted by the U.S. government.
NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander responded to the two lawmakers Tuesday, and while he didn't admit inaccuracy, he said the documents could have been clearer.
"After reviewing your letter, I agree that the fact sheet that the National Security Agency posted on its website on 18 June 2013 could have more precisely described the requirements for collection under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act," Alexander said in a letter of his own (posted here).
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2013/06/nsa-takes-surveillance-fact-sheets-off-website-167073.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 955 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (28)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NSA: Thank you Democrats Wyden and Udall: NSA takes surveillance fact sheets off website (Original Post)
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
OP
Hahaha! My original title was NSA lies. So happy to see Wyden and Udall speaking up.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#2
I guess it was "the least untruthful" description that they could make of what they do
kenny blankenship
Jun 2013
#4
think
(11,641 posts)1. Lies lies & more lies.
They should just tell the truth . No one would believe them anyways....
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)2. Hahaha! My original title was NSA lies. So happy to see Wyden and Udall speaking up.
We have to let them know that they have our back. Without support, they will end up feeling that they are speaking in a vacuum.
http://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact/
http://www.markudall.senate.gov/?p=contact
think
(11,641 posts)5. I sent them both a thank you note.
Hopefully more Senators will join them and something wil get done to reign the NSA in.
When Senators need permission to tell us that the NSA has violated the constitution according to a classified FISA court ruling things have truly gone much too far...
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)3. +++ Precisely why, "Let us tell you how what we're doing in the dark is ok"
... means NOTHING.
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)4. I guess it was "the least untruthful" description that they could make of what they do
while still being consistent with their organizational mission directive of lying their asses off to the public.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)6. I got them!!!!