Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:41 PM Jun 2013

So the Zimmerman trial boils down to this

After watching/listening to two days of testimony-

Racist fuck George on his hero trip saw black dude walking in the rain-

He did all his 911 and non-emergency 411 calls

Trayvon saw asshole following him...

At some point confrontation...

I think Trayvon started beating his ass and loser shot him-

The defense already brought up that Zimmerman went to some boxing/martial arts club and the instructor wouldn't let him in the ring because he would have been hurt. They basically said their client was a (can't use P word) weakling


The outcome of this will be interesting to say the least, (read some commentary on upstate Florida jurors)

105 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So the Zimmerman trial boils down to this (Original Post) snooper2 Jun 2013 OP
it was Trayvon who was fighting for his life Skittles Jun 2013 #1
Depends on what the jury believes.... Pelican Jun 2013 #2
Trayvon was fighting for his life against a gun-toting vigilante who STALKED him Skittles Jun 2013 #9
Because for some reason stand your ground doesn't apply to him. uppityperson Jun 2013 #18
it boggles my mind Skittles Jun 2013 #22
perhaps because, in theory, he wasn't being attacked. hfojvt Jun 2013 #39
And the person following shouldn't be a fucking jerk to Fawke Em Jun 2013 #49
I carried an opened pocketknife when being followed in the city and if he'd come closer I'd not had uppityperson Jun 2013 #57
Furthermore, Fearing for your life after starting shit is not ok, like zimmy did uppityperson Jun 2013 #58
THANK YOU Skittles Jun 2013 #68
"somebody who is only following you"---WITH A GUN, AT NIGHT, UNIDENTIFIED. WinkyDink Jun 2013 #103
You're almost there... Pelican Jun 2013 #23
we don't know why because Martin is DEAD Skittles Jun 2013 #26
Just expand on that... Pelican Jun 2013 #28
Zimmerman chased him from 7:11 (when Trayvon started running) until MillennialDem Jun 2013 #33
If the evidence bears out... Pelican Jun 2013 #40
It's in the timeline. Not sure if it has been brought in court, you are right on that count. MillennialDem Jun 2013 #41
And Martin is heard asking Zimmerman why he is being followed just before chelsea0011 Jun 2013 #80
one trouble with that hfojvt Jun 2013 #42
Possible, or possible he didn't know where he was going / got lost. It was raining and dark. MillennialDem Jun 2013 #43
the timeline bears WHAT out? hfojvt Jun 2013 #48
That Trayvon Martin ran away from Zimmerman and it took approx ~5 min for them to make contact again MillennialDem Jun 2013 #56
Ever had an armed bigot stalking you with hatred and a gun? Hoyt Jun 2013 #32
Whether is meets a legal standard is a stupid question? Pelican Jun 2013 #45
I'll give you a guess.... CC Jun 2013 #51
Interesting... Pelican Jun 2013 #54
A guess is a guess you know. CC Jun 2013 #105
There is no DNA on Martin from Zimmerman, the fight BS is just Rex Jun 2013 #93
It's obvious they got into a fight snooper2 Jun 2013 #3
except that, according to the autopsy report, martin had NONE of zimmy's dna on him, except niyad Jun 2013 #4
4 or 5 punches would have done the damage shown on Zimmy snooper2 Jun 2013 #5
well, the autopsy says no dna on martin--the nose incident could have happened any time, and the niyad Jun 2013 #13
i wonder if he bashed himself in the nose with his flashlight Voice for Peace Jun 2013 #61
Trayvon was fighting for his life against a gun-toting vigilante Skittles Jun 2013 #7
It was Martin who, justifiably, "stood his ground" arcane1 Jun 2013 #6
there's plenty of gun-humping DUer's defending that coward Zimmerman Skittles Jun 2013 #8
This is the most succinct description of events I've read. Prism Jun 2013 #14
Thanks. That's even more of a compliment since it came before I fixed the quotes :) arcane1 Jun 2013 #24
It's ok. I'm fluent in errant message board format =) Prism Jun 2013 #31
I am sorta puzzled hfojvt Jun 2013 #50
Yup. If you think Zimmerman was getting his ass kicked that sets up self defense. dkf Jun 2013 #55
The short answer: he started it. He was seeking an altercation and it didn't go as he planned. arcane1 Jun 2013 #86
Nicely stated, I agree Progressive dog Jun 2013 #81
What does not make sense is that Zimmerman called the avebury Jun 2013 #10
I haven't been following this..just speculating.. pipoman Jun 2013 #12
I live in Oklahoma City which is a highly populated urban area. avebury Jun 2013 #19
I bet he was surprised when some unarmed kid stood up to the bigot with a gun. Hoyt Jun 2013 #34
Watch the neighborhood watch coordinator's testimony... Pelican Jun 2013 #25
It just boggles my mind that this situation would have been a call avebury Jun 2013 #27
Whatever national policy may be for neighborhood watch... Pelican Jun 2013 #29
Zimmerman is not on trial for calling the police. (nt) Nine Jun 2013 #69
Correct... have a cookie... Pelican Jun 2013 #70
You're the one who brought it up. Nine Jun 2013 #71
Actually Post #27 brought it up... Pelican Jun 2013 #72
The defense hasn't called any witnesses yet B2G Jun 2013 #76
Correct... Pelican Jun 2013 #77
I haven't been following pipoman Jun 2013 #11
PLEASE explain to me Skittles Jun 2013 #15
What is this stalking you're on about? Llewlladdwr Jun 2013 #30
BS - when it's a bigot with a gun, pick up a brick if that what it takes Hoyt Jun 2013 #35
So sucker punching bigots is legal? for everyone? Recursion Jun 2013 #62
It's pretty accurate. Hoyt Jun 2013 #64
Next time you see a bigot, you should punch him and try that rationale in court... Pelican Jun 2013 #73
Highly likely I would not make it to court. Most gun toters/lovers/cultists are bigots. Hoyt Jun 2013 #85
Why are people making up stuff about a fight? Rex Jun 2013 #95
Witnesses say there was a fight. We don't know who started it. Recursion Jun 2013 #98
Trayvon RAN for 5 minutes after Zimmerman was "stalking" him in his truck. If someone is MillennialDem Jun 2013 #38
I'm pretty sure that is the part you defenders do NOT understand Skittles Jun 2013 #67
Well, technically a middle aged gal had not been recently arrested for burglary in the neighborhood. Pelican Jun 2013 #75
LOL Skittles Jun 2013 #87
that's news to me backwoodsbob Jun 2013 #37
You are not allowed to punch someone pipoman Jun 2013 #74
he was being STALKED Skittles Jun 2013 #88
Maybe.. pipoman Jun 2013 #90
he REPEATEDLY targeted what he perceived to be "young punks" Skittles Jun 2013 #91
according to the autopsy report, NO zimmy dna found on martin. wounds not consistent with niyad Jun 2013 #16
I saw some initial reports from witnesses that had Martin on top of Zimmerman... Pelican Jun 2013 #63
So what if Trayvon threw the first punch? XemaSab Jun 2013 #17
Had Trayvon been carring a gun he would have been avebury Jun 2013 #20
Agree completely, but police probably would have shot him, Hoyt Jun 2013 #36
Exactly sad-cafe Jun 2013 #21
He does appear to be doped to the gills Mariana Jun 2013 #46
Or he could be stressed out about the murder trial uppityperson Jun 2013 #59
Oh, certainly, that could be. Mariana Jun 2013 #82
There is absolutely no evidence that shows a physical altercation. Rex Jun 2013 #44
Zimmermans wounds and reports of seeing Martin on top... Pelican Jun 2013 #52
Really someone saw the altercation? The BS just keeps getting deeper. Rex Jun 2013 #92
Read carefully.... Pelican Jun 2013 #99
Fox, Stormfront, freepers forum, NRA, KKK, the yahoo next door, etc. Hoyt Jun 2013 #65
Some here too, how pathetic and desperate are they? Rex Jun 2013 #94
There is a trial going on, and the cool thing is.. snooper2 Jun 2013 #100
What I want to know at this point is moondust Jun 2013 #47
"These fucking punks always get away" Incitatus Jun 2013 #53
I have noticed Notafraidtoo Jun 2013 #60
+1000 Kingofalldems Jun 2013 #66
Body on grass mainstreetonce Jun 2013 #78
You can't use the P word because it it sexist and misogynistic. Unless you a d#@@. WCLinolVir Jun 2013 #79
But I notice the media never had a problem talking about "Pussy Riot" BlueStreak Jun 2013 #83
There were no marks on Trayvon's hands BlueToTheBone Jun 2013 #84
No evidence that Trayvon ever hit Zimmerman yardwork Jun 2013 #89
Yeah a few people in this thread keep ignoring that fact. Rex Jun 2013 #96
Zimmerman's entire defense rests on it yardwork Jun 2013 #101
Yeah, two days is enough. Who needs to hear a defense anyway? ksoze Jun 2013 #97
Two days is more than Trayvon Martin got. yardwork Jun 2013 #102
Observers can make up their minds whenever they want. THAT is why jurors are different. WinkyDink Jun 2013 #104
 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
2. Depends on what the jury believes....
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:46 PM
Jun 2013

If Martin threw the first punch it will be a tough sell....

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
9. Trayvon was fighting for his life against a gun-toting vigilante who STALKED him
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:00 AM
Jun 2013

WHY WOULDN'T HE FIGHT???

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
22. it boggles my mind
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:16 AM
Jun 2013

it's so clear Trayvon was standing his ground - he was where he was supposed to be, minding his own business and he is DEAD yet it will supposedly come down to who threw the first punch?? WTF!

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
39. perhaps because, in theory, he wasn't being attacked.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:46 AM
Jun 2013

Stand your ground does not give you the right to use deadly force against somebody who is only following you.

It is much more reasonable to fear for your safety when somebody is on top of you, punching you, than it is to fear for your safety because somebody is walking behind you. Sure, that can be creepy at night, but for all you know they are looking for a lost cat or something. Until they assault you, you are not necessarily in danger. Whereas the guy on his back - well, he IS being assaulted, and battered.

Plus, a person being followed obviously has the option to retreat. Whereas a person pinned to the ground does not have the same option. Does he?

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
49. And the person following shouldn't be a fucking jerk to
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:48 AM
Jun 2013

the point that he has to be the person pinned.

Pick you battles wisely.

I, myself, am getting a new fence my neighbor doesn't like, yet it's on my property and not our shared driveway. Next time he burns (and there is no permit shit. It IS illegal in the city) or next time his dogs is nearly choking and cannot reach her water because she's on a leash for hours and wrapped by herself, I'm calling the authorities. My criminal neighbor didn't pick his battles wisely.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
57. I carried an opened pocketknife when being followed in the city and if he'd come closer I'd not had
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 04:28 AM
Jun 2013

the option to retreat. If he'd come closer I'd have had that knife in him before he would be able to assault me.

A black teen in Florida might have every reason to fear for his life, being followed in the dark like that.

Trayvon sure did.

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
23. You're almost there...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:21 AM
Jun 2013

... now explain why Martin was correct to throw the first punch.

Zimmerman must have done X ( yelled at him, ran after him in an aggressive manner etc, drew a gun on him.. etc..) which caused Martin to be in fear for his safety and he struck Zimmerman because of X Y and Z.

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
26. we don't know why because Martin is DEAD
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:26 AM
Jun 2013

but it is reasonable to assume he was in fear of his LIFE from this nutcase who STALKED HIM FOR NO REASON

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
28. Just expand on that...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:35 AM
Jun 2013

What did Zimmerman do to make Martin fear for his life/safety?

If you are just going to leave it at "walked toward him" then it doesn't meet any semblance of a legal standard.

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
33. Zimmerman chased him from 7:11 (when Trayvon started running) until
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:25 AM
Jun 2013

7:16 (when the yelling/fighting started).

I don't know, if I was RUNNING for 5 minutes and couldn't lose some dude who just comes up yelling at me, yeah I'm going to suspect he's either a nutcase and could harm me, or that he chased me because he does want to harm me.

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
40. If the evidence bears out...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:49 AM
Jun 2013

Last edited Wed Jun 26, 2013, 08:04 AM - Edit history (1)

... that Zimmeran ran after Martin yelling and screaming and that Martin made a concerted effort to get away from him, that absolutely could qualify.

I don't think that has made it out so far as part of the narrative but all that really matters is what happens in court.


 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
41. It's in the timeline. Not sure if it has been brought in court, you are right on that count.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:59 AM
Jun 2013

At an unverified time, Trayvon Martin walks from the home where he is staying to get snacks from a nearby 7-Eleven.[7]

6:24:18 PM — A store video shows Martin purchasing a bag of Skittles and an Arizona Watermelon Fruit Juice Cocktail. (Commonly referred to in the media and protests as Arizona Iced Tea)[8][9][10][11][12]

6:54 - 7:12 — Martin has an 18-minute cell phone call with a girl (reported to be his girlfriend) that gets disconnected.[11][13]

7:09:34 - 7:13:41 — George Zimmerman calls the Sanford Police Department (SPD) from his truck; total time of the call is 4 minutes 7 seconds.[14]

7:11:33 — Zimmerman tells the police dispatcher that Trayvon Martin is running.

7:11:59 — In reply to the dispatcher's question, "Are you following him?" Zimmerman says, "Yes." Dispatcher states, "OK, we don't need you to do that." Zimmerman replies, "OK."

7:12:00 - 7:12:59 — The girl calls Martin again at some point during this minute.[15]

7:13:10 — Zimmerman says he does not know where Martin is.

Map of the Retreat at Twin Lakes

7:13:41 — Zimmerman's call to Sanford police ends.[15]

7:16:00 - 7:16:59 — Martin's call from the girl goes dead during this minute.[15][16]

7:16:11 — First 911 call from witness about a fight, calls for help heard.[17]

7:16:55 — Gunshot heard on 911 call.[18]

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)
80. And Martin is heard asking Zimmerman why he is being followed just before
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 09:03 AM
Jun 2013

phone call to girlfriend goes dead. Martin is killed within the next two minutes. It is interesting to me that Martin asks why he is being followed meaning that he was aware before hand that Zimmerman was already following him. Zimmerman also has a gun in his belt. Does Martin now notice this? Martin is clearly aware that he is being stalked by Zimmerman. He is the one that should be concerned. Zimmerman has a lot of explaining to do when he takes the stand as he says he will.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
42. one trouble with that
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:01 AM
Jun 2013

Martin died less than half a mile from his home. Five minutes of running by me from Zimmerman's car would probably put me a quarter mile PAST Trayvon's house. And I am a 51 year old guy with bad knees and 15 pounds of extra weight. My 17 year old self would run circles around the current me.

Not to mention that Zimmerman was still on the phone with dispatch for a minute AFTER he said "shit, he's running" and "I don't know where he is".

It's always possible that a young male might choose NOT to run IF he thought he could kick the other guy's a$$.

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
43. Possible, or possible he didn't know where he was going / got lost. It was raining and dark.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:02 AM
Jun 2013

He did apparently take that "T" intersection between people's yards and it is possible he never took that route before.

The timeline bears it out though.


At an unverified time, Trayvon Martin walks from the home where he is staying to get snacks from a nearby 7-Eleven.[7]

6:24:18 PM — A store video shows Martin purchasing a bag of Skittles and an Arizona Watermelon Fruit Juice Cocktail. (Commonly referred to in the media and protests as Arizona Iced Tea)[8][9][10][11][12]

6:54 - 7:12 — Martin has an 18-minute cell phone call with a girl (reported to be his girlfriend) that gets disconnected.[11][13]

7:09:34 - 7:13:41 — George Zimmerman calls the Sanford Police Department (SPD) from his truck; total time of the call is 4 minutes 7 seconds.[14]

7:11:33 — Zimmerman tells the police dispatcher that Trayvon Martin is running.

7:11:59 — In reply to the dispatcher's question, "Are you following him?" Zimmerman says, "Yes." Dispatcher states, "OK, we don't need you to do that." Zimmerman replies, "OK."

7:12:00 - 7:12:59 — The girl calls Martin again at some point during this minute.[15]

7:13:10 — Zimmerman says he does not know where Martin is.

Map of the Retreat at Twin Lakes

7:13:41 — Zimmerman's call to Sanford police ends.[15]

7:16:00 - 7:16:59 — Martin's call from the girl goes dead during this minute.[15][16]

7:16:11 — First 911 call from witness about a fight, calls for help heard.[17]

7:16:55 — Gunshot heard on 911 call.[18]

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
48. the timeline bears WHAT out?
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:42 AM
Jun 2013

Not sure where you got that timeline. Some place that also includes a "map of the retreat at Twin Lakes" Be interesting to see a map with some distances marked off on it.

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
56. That Trayvon Martin ran away from Zimmerman and it took approx ~5 min for them to make contact again
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 04:03 AM
Jun 2013
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
32. Ever had an armed bigot stalking you with hatred and a gun?
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:20 AM
Jun 2013

You wouldn't ask such a stupid question.

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
45. Whether is meets a legal standard is a stupid question?
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:08 AM
Jun 2013

Lord, you must really have a beef with the prosecution...

CC

(8,039 posts)
51. I'll give you a guess....
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 03:03 AM
Jun 2013

Seventeen year old teen walking back from store. Strange man in a car starts following him and looking at him. Teen makes sure the strange man in car knows he sees him by staring at him. Teen makes phone call because a strange man is following him with his car. Man stops car and gets out, stalks toward teen and grabs arm. Teen fights for his life because he has no idea what this strange man is trying to do. Parents, schools and cops have spent a lifetime telling kids/teens to not talk to strangers, don't let a stranger grab you and don't go near a stranger's car because there are violent perverts out that that want to steal you, rape you and kill you and to fight for your life if you can't get away.
Now there is no way of knowing for sure what was going on Trayvon's head because Zimmerman ignored police advice to stay put and he ignored all the rules of neighborhood watch avoiding confrontation and to just watch and call police. I can tell you this, if Zimmerman had followed the rules as they were set for the Neighborhood Watch and listened to the dispatcher Trayvon would not have died at Zimmerman's hands and both would be living their lives now.

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
54. Interesting...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 03:26 AM
Jun 2013

Is there anything to support that Zimmerman made the first physical move, grabbing his arm?

or is that just your speculation as to what might have happened?

Also, take into account the time in which Zimmerman claims that he lost sight of Martin.

Who found who first and why?

CC

(8,039 posts)
105. A guess is a guess you know.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:12 AM
Jun 2013

And I offered a guess as an example of why the kid might of fought and could of been standing his ground. Course I have heard the tape of Zimmerman's call to police where he stated he was following him. What I do know from Zimmerman's own words is he was following, confronted and killed a 17 year old male. Now it is up to a jury to decide if that is OK to do it that way in their community, I don't live in Florida anymore and won't move back while it is a 3rd world banana republic.



 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
93. There is no DNA on Martin from Zimmerman, the fight BS is just
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:30 PM
Jun 2013

a desperate attempt by some here to make Martin sound dangerous. I AM SURE they have NO agenda whatsoever.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
3. It's obvious they got into a fight
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:47 PM
Jun 2013

The only one that did something wrong was georgie who was getting his ass kicked and shot him-

That should be enough to send the punk to prison-



If anybody thinks Zimmerman did those wounds to himself they are delusional. Or, they have never been in a fight before-

The little knot on the right side of his head would have been one punch.

I think he will go down for murder for sure. Shit, if two people got into a fight in Deep Elum and one died, the other one is doing time. That's why it's called murder.

niyad

(113,325 posts)
4. except that, according to the autopsy report, martin had NONE of zimmy's dna on him, except
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:54 PM
Jun 2013

a bit of blood on his cuff.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
5. 4 or 5 punches would have done the damage shown on Zimmy
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:57 PM
Jun 2013

+, it was raining-

+, George may have fell down as it seems he's a clumsy loser and bashed the back of his head that way-


Wonder if he plans to take the stand?

niyad

(113,325 posts)
13. well, the autopsy says no dna on martin--the nose incident could have happened any time, and the
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:06 AM
Jun 2013

few marks on the back of his head not consistent with being smacked on the ground on concrete--looks more like smacked his head standing up, given blood flow patterns.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
6. It was Martin who, justifiably, "stood his ground"
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:57 PM
Jun 2013

That's how I see it.

Zimmerman's goal was to make sure that this one didn't "get away", like "they always" do.

He got more then he bargained for.

Carrying a gun, and knowing the cops may eventually arrive to rescue him, gave him a distorted sense of safety-assured bravado.

Instead, he got his ass kicked (or at least his ego)

Then the coward tries to claim self-defense as he was practically standing in a stranger's backyard.

The crazy thing to me is how much the right wants to stand up for him. His freakin' DAD published a book last week that says black people are the "real" racists!

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
14. This is the most succinct description of events I've read.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:07 AM
Jun 2013

All the elements are there and very much reflect my thinking on the matter. Nice post.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
50. I am sorta puzzled
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:49 AM
Jun 2013

as to why you think a guy who is getting his a$$ kicked somehow does NOT have a right to defend himself.

I am not on the right, and the way you described it. Why should I think that a person who does not want to see home burglars "get away" a bad person who deserves to get his a$$ kicked?

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
55. Yup. If you think Zimmerman was getting his ass kicked that sets up self defense.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 03:29 AM
Jun 2013

Not a good point to concede.

The point that would sell a murder charge is that Zimmerman wasn't in any danger at all and shot Martin for kicks and giggles.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
86. The short answer: he started it. He was seeking an altercation and it didn't go as he planned.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 10:41 AM
Jun 2013

Progressive dog

(6,904 posts)
81. Nicely stated, I agree
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 09:09 AM
Jun 2013

That RW and NRA pushed the SYG laws through to give their racist buddies the opportunity to hunt people and get away with it .If you are bored with shooting targets and animals, stalk and kill the black child wearing the hoodie, no hunting license required.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
10. What does not make sense is that Zimmerman called the
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:00 AM
Jun 2013

non-emergency number. When I have attended neighborhood association meetings (occasionally with a police officer in attendance) they always tell us to call 911 never the non-emergency number. If Zimmerman was that concerned about Treyvon Martin and there are been all there prior "incidences" at the complex, Zimmerman should have been calling the 911 number. I don't see how Zimmerman can actually convince anybody of how concerned he was about Martin because he was not concerned enough to call 911. You don't react to a real perceived threat by calling a non-emergency number.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
12. I haven't been following this..just speculating..
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:03 AM
Jun 2013

but maybe he didn't perceive a serious threat until the confrontation went out of control?

avebury

(10,952 posts)
19. I live in Oklahoma City which is a highly populated urban area.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:15 AM
Jun 2013

The police will tell you point blank that if you see something that concerns you - call 911 do not call the non-emergency number. The length of time for response for a 911 call is a lot faster then a non-emergency number because you do not become high on their priority list. That said, it makes me wonder if he intentionally called the non-emergency number because the response time would be longer and thus give him more time to act as a cop wannabee/vigilante.

If Zimmerman was that concerned because there have been so many prior incidents that occurred in that gated community it just does not make sense to call the non-emergency number. He claims that there has been all these prior incidences but they don't rise to the level of warranting calling 911?

The more I hear about his statements, the evidence and really think about things, the more I think that his story stinks to high heaven.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
34. I bet he was surprised when some unarmed kid stood up to the bigot with a gun.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:25 AM
Jun 2013

So the armed bigot shot him.

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
25. Watch the neighborhood watch coordinator's testimony...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:25 AM
Jun 2013

Last edited Wed Jun 26, 2013, 09:13 AM - Edit history (1)

... and the breakdown between when they are supposed to call 911 (emergency) and the non emergency for suspicious activity.

She said that what Zimmerman saw was an example of when you should call the non-emergency line, especially given the fact that a man of similar age and description had been arrested recently in the uptick of burglaries ( mentioned only for context)

I will add that this woman was a prosecution witness...

edit: early morning post

avebury

(10,952 posts)
27. It just boggles my mind that this situation would have been a call
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:34 AM
Jun 2013

non-emergency number. In most highly populated urban areas you will be waiting a really long time for the police to show up if you call the non-emergency number. Non-emergency calls just are not that high on the police's priority list. Zimmerman was an accident waiting to happen. He blatantly violated the rules of neighborhood watch - he carried a gun, he followed the "suspect" and (I don't care how nice they thought the guy was) he was a legal liability to that community. It is only by blind dumb luck that he didn't happen to follow someone who was also packing a gun. In different circumstances he could have just as easily been the one shot dead and justifiable because another person could have deemed him a credible threat.

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
29. Whatever national policy may be for neighborhood watch...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:39 AM
Jun 2013

The police liaison to the program said the following.

"Do you talk with them about firearms specifically, West asked?

No, it’s not my place to tell participants not to carry a gun, that’s their right."

"West then explored some hypothetical situations and asked her if they were the types of scenarios in which she would advise a NWP participant to report suspicious behavior to the police. He then went on to describe precisely the behavior in which Trayvon Martin had been engaged–wandering aimlessly in the rain, looking into buildings, walking outside of normal paths in areas one would not normally expect a person to walk. Oh, definitely, answered Dorival, that’s exactly the kind of behavior we encourage NWP participants to report to the police."

This woman is a prosecution witness by the way...

Nine

(1,741 posts)
71. You're the one who brought it up.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 08:09 AM
Jun 2013

What's the point in arguing that Trayvon Martin was acting suspiciously and Zimmerman was correct to call the police? Zimmerman is on trial for murder not for calling the police.

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
72. Actually Post #27 brought it up...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 08:15 AM
Jun 2013

... and I provided some detail and context from the day's proceedings.

Read the thread before you just mash out an outraged response.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
11. I haven't been following
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:01 AM
Jun 2013

this as closely as you. If it is as you say, and the jury believes Travon threw the first punch, he will likely walk. A fight, especially if someone is beating another's head on the ground, that would be a threat of great physical harm or death.

It will be interesting for sure. How many days is this trial supposed to last?

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
15. PLEASE explain to me
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:07 AM
Jun 2013

why Trayvon is not allowed to punch a gun-toting vigilante who is stalking him FOR NO REASON?

Llewlladdwr

(2,165 posts)
30. What is this stalking you're on about?
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:39 AM
Jun 2013

You do know that there is absolutely *nothing* illegal about following someone who's walking through your neighborhood.

You don't need a reason. There is no "right to not be followed".

You can even *legally* walk right up to a stranger and ask them what they're doing or why they're there. They don't have to answer, of course, but simply asking them a question doesn't give them the right to attack you.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
35. BS - when it's a bigot with a gun, pick up a brick if that what it takes
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:29 AM
Jun 2013

to survive.

It ain't legal - or moral - to corner an unarmed kid.

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
73. Next time you see a bigot, you should punch him and try that rationale in court...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 08:18 AM
Jun 2013

I'll bet it works wonderfully...

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
95. Why are people making up stuff about a fight?
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:33 PM
Jun 2013

Just too desperate to find anything else to come up with?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
98. Witnesses say there was a fight. We don't know who started it.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:43 PM
Jun 2013

The prosecution and defense don't contest that there was a fight.

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
38. Trayvon RAN for 5 minutes after Zimmerman was "stalking" him in his truck. If someone is
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:40 AM
Jun 2013

giving you the creeps by following you around and you run away from them for FIVE MINUTES and they still catch up to you, I think that probably gave Martin fear in his mind that Zimmerman could have done him harm.

Self defense only requires a reasonable sense of fear that you will be harmed. It does not require the "offending" party commits an illegal act.

Let's say for example a woman is beaten by her husband repeatedly. He also has a favorite insult word to use on her while he beats her up, let's just say he calls her "fatty". She decides to run away all the way across the country, well over a thousand miles away. She does not get a restraining order.

Out of the blue while in a public place, her now ex husband shows up. She sees him and tries to run away from him, he chases her and yells "come here fatty!". None of that is illegal.

Would she be justified in self defense? Most likely yes. Almost certainly the use of non-deadly force self defense.

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
67. I'm pretty sure that is the part you defenders do NOT understand
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 07:55 AM
Jun 2013

Trayvon was, yes, STALKEDfor NO REASON other than his appearance - do you really think Zimmerman would have treated, say, a middle-aged gal the same way? Keep in mind Trayvon was where he was supposed to be, MINDING HIS OWN BUSINESS

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
75. Well, technically a middle aged gal had not been recently arrested for burglary in the neighborhood.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 08:38 AM
Jun 2013

So I don't think the comparison holds.

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
87. LOL
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 11:08 AM
Jun 2013

it's not like anyone would be looking for them!!! Trayvon was targeted for his race - it's an utter DISGRACE.

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
88. he was being STALKED
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 11:09 AM
Jun 2013

something happened that made him FEAR FOR HIS LIFE -- that is called STANDING YOUR GROUND

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
90. Maybe..
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:38 PM
Jun 2013

I've seen a fair amount of people convicted of battery under similar circumstances. Not saying it should be, just that it usually is believed that the first person to lay hands on another person committed battery and anything which results goes back to that person. Most judges I've heard in these cases don't excuse the action because the person was saying bad things or even threatening to do something. And "stalked" has a very specific legal definition which includes repeated menacing acts, not necessarily illegal individually, that when combined makes the person fear for their safety. This would more likely be some form of harassment..in the statutory sense..as I said, it will be interesting...and I haven't followed the details of this case very closely..there is certainly a chance I am missing something..also, it is impossible to forecast a jury decision..

How much longer is the trial supposed to last?

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
91. he REPEATEDLY targeted what he perceived to be "young punks"
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:16 PM
Jun 2013

they did not have to be necessarily DOING anything suspicious - they just had to LOOK the part - THAT IS HARASSMENT. It sickens me to see that gun humping coward playing the victim - HE STALKED AND MURDERED AN INNOCENT TEENAGER.

niyad

(113,325 posts)
16. according to the autopsy report, NO zimmy dna found on martin. wounds not consistent with
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:09 AM
Jun 2013

fight as described by zimmy. no marks on zimmy's clothing, no grass stains, etc. only marks on martin's clothes. no fight. martin face down, with hands underneath him. could not have been fighting. zimmy even admits that martin was face down. not exactly a threat, would you say?

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
63. I saw some initial reports from witnesses that had Martin on top of Zimmerman...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 06:49 AM
Jun 2013

Did those fall through?

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
17. So what if Trayvon threw the first punch?
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:11 AM
Jun 2013

Some dude's creeping on you in a dark alley, the guy's not wanting to share the Good News about Jesus with you.

If Zimmerman didn't want a fight, he shouldn't have gone chasing Trayvon down.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
36. Agree completely, but police probably would have shot him,
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:30 AM
Jun 2013

certainly thrown him in jail that night.

 

sad-cafe

(1,277 posts)
21. Exactly
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:16 AM
Jun 2013

Zimmy was looking for a fight, wanted to do just what he did. I even bet he doesn't understand why he isn't considered a hero and probably doesn't understand why he is on trial

asshole looks wacked out during court. A few times I thought maybe he was sleeping

Mariana

(14,857 posts)
46. He does appear to be doped to the gills
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:14 AM
Jun 2013

doesn't he? I suspect he's on some serious tranks. Interesting, if so. Is he so explosive that that's the only way to keep him under control, and keep his mouth shut in the courtroom? Maybe his lawyers are afraid that if he's fully conscious, he'll start spontaneously raving about fucking punks and assholes that always get away.

Mariana

(14,857 posts)
82. Oh, certainly, that could be.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 09:12 AM
Jun 2013

But to be dosed to the point of showing no reaction at all to anything that's going on, and even appearing to doze off from time to time, is a bit much. It can't be winning him any points with the jury.

Of course, I'm just speculating. Maybe he's like this all the time.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
44. There is absolutely no evidence that shows a physical altercation.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:03 AM
Jun 2013

I don't know where people are getting this misinformation from.

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
52. Zimmermans wounds and reports of seeing Martin on top...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 03:03 AM
Jun 2013

... are where most of it comes from.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
92. Really someone saw the altercation? The BS just keeps getting deeper.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:28 PM
Jun 2013

There are no wounds or DNA on Martin hands or body from Zim. Why do people keep lying about this? So now people saw Martin on top? Funny how that was all decided on bullshit, guess you didn't get the memo.

 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
99. Read carefully....
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:02 PM
Jun 2013

I said the reports that he was seen on top that came out as part of the initial reporting. I didn't speak to their accuracy.

Also, there is no denying that Zimmerman had some wounds. You can go all conspiracy theory and say that he did it to himself or argue over their severity but not their existence.

Take a breathe and don't try so hard to be offended...

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
94. Some here too, how pathetic and desperate are they?
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:31 PM
Jun 2013

There is no proof of a physical altercation. Some here just want Martin to end up being a victim, while Zim walks free. It is pathetically obvious some here have a clear and sad agenda.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
100. There is a trial going on, and the cool thing is..
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:40 PM
Jun 2013

You can watch it live!

Why don't you watch it instead of getting pissed about people stating what they have learned and know to be the case.


"Some here just want Martin to be the victim"

Call them out, how about a link to someone?

moondust

(19,988 posts)
47. What I want to know at this point is
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 02:40 AM
Jun 2013

did the police follow up on all the previous 911 calls Zimmerman made reporting "black guys" in the neighborhood, and if so what did the police find? Are there incident reports? That information would seem to help one side or the other as far as Zimmerman's credibility, potential racial profiling, etc.

If the police didn't find anything was Zimmerman then making stuff up in an effort to "create some action" that he might later be rewarded for, i.e. self-promotion?

I don't think the judge has ruled yet on whether or not to allow those previous calls into the proceedings.

Incitatus

(5,317 posts)
53. "These fucking punks always get away"
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 03:08 AM
Jun 2013

That statement, along with him getting out of his car with a gun to pursue Trayvon gives an indication as to who the instigator was. Trayvon just wanted to go home. Zimmerman was looking for trouble and apparently already has his mind made up as to what Trayvon was

Notafraidtoo

(402 posts)
60. I have noticed
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 05:02 AM
Jun 2013

That some of the most staunch supporters of the NRA here on the Gun forum also go out of their way to defend Zimmerman,I thought this was a Democratic website that tombstones teabaggers. I can understand being pro gun and being democrat but to be pro NRA and Stand your ground a ALEC law well you are just a Republican on a forum that doesn't want you.

mainstreetonce

(4,178 posts)
78. Body on grass
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 08:49 AM
Jun 2013

Defense says Martin used concrete sidewalk as a weapon?

Looks like Zimmerman took one punish to the nose. He says he was hit about 25 times. Not one bruise on his face,
Cuts on head most likely from contact with small stones in grass.

no blood or DNA on Martin should prove Zimmerman's story untrue

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
83. But I notice the media never had a problem talking about "Pussy Riot"
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 09:13 AM
Jun 2013

Seems to me they kind of enjoyed saying that.

Over and over and over ...

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
96. Yeah a few people in this thread keep ignoring that fact.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:34 PM
Jun 2013

I guess they didn't get the right talking points from Foxnews. Pretty pathetic.

yardwork

(61,622 posts)
101. Zimmerman's entire defense rests on it
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 03:37 PM
Jun 2013

So it's not surprising that the internet is full of assurances that Martin hit Zimmerman.

ksoze

(2,068 posts)
97. Yeah, two days is enough. Who needs to hear a defense anyway?
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:38 PM
Jun 2013

And what's with this jury thing? I mean two days of prosecution is enough to see what happened. In fcat,maybe not even alow the defendant in court at all - just arrest, prosecute and move on. Just skip to sentencing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So the Zimmerman trial bo...