Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Paul Ryan Focusing More on Hurting the Poor"
Paul Ryan Focusing More on Hurting the PoorBy Jonathan Chait at New York Magazine
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/06/paul-ryan-focusing-more-on-hurting-the-poor.html
"SNIP................................
Just last week, the House provided another example of Ryans anti-poverty principles in action. It enacted a large cut in food stamps, as Ryan has been calling for. Then, concluding this hadnt gone far enough, it added a provision allowing states to cut off beneficiaries who didnt have a job. As Robert Greenstein explained, this was completely unlike the welfare provisions designed to encourage people to get jobs:
Work requirements in low-income programs require unemployed people to look for jobs, to accept any job offer, to participate in workforce or training programs if there is a slot available in a program, and the like. If the individuals fail to comply with the requirements, they can be sanctioned by having their benefits cut or terminated. The SNAP program also disqualifies people who quit a job.
This is not what the Southerland amendment would do. It would allow states to end benefits for most adults who receive or apply for SNAP including parents with young children and many people with disabilities if they are not working or participating in a work or training program for at least 20 hours a week. The amendment provides no jobs and no funds for work or training programs, and it does not require states to make any work opportunities available. People who want to work and are looking for a job but havent found one could be cut off.
A conventional analysis would call this approach cruel, bordering on sociopathic. Its one thing to tailor policy to encourage people to work. Its another to create a new punishment for people who cant find jobs. And given the baseline reality of mass unemployment for low-skilled workers, and a bill that proposes nothing to create more jobs or even job training, the Southerland amendment would do nothing but punish the poor. Ryan voted for it, naturally.
.................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 634 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Paul Ryan Focusing More on Hurting the Poor" (Original Post)
applegrove
Jun 2013
OP
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)1. Wingers are both mean AND evil. nt
KT2000
(20,585 posts)2. the party of hate
they are sadists.