Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,911 posts)
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 06:00 PM Feb 2012

Maine GOP failed to count communities that voted DURING caucus period.

However, a review of the town-by-town results released Saturday by the Maine GOP suggests that some communities that had caucused prior to Feb. 11 were not counted. Nearly all Waldo County towns held caucuses on Feb. 4 but those towns were blank in the results released by the state party. Additionally, Waterville held its caucuses ahead of time but were not included in the results.

Waldo County GOP Chairman Raymond St. Onge said the results were sent to the state party on Tuesday, Feb. 7. He said those results probably would not have changed the outcome but was disheartened the votes were not included.

As of early Tuesday afternoon, St. Onge said he had not received an answer from the Maine GOP on why Waldo County’s results were omitted.

Maine GOP Chairman Charlie Webster said Monday that including all caucus votes likely would not change the outcome of the state’s preference poll. Asked whether the party would consider updating the result to include all communities, he said that is up to the state party committee, which meets next month.

http://bangordailynews.com/2012/02/14/politics/pressure-mounting-for-gop-caucus-reconsideration/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

librechik

(30,674 posts)
2. gee, too bad we didn't actually count the votes, but we're pretty sure
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 06:05 PM
Feb 2012

they wouldn't have changed anything. Trust us!

WTF???

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
3. Oh, counting votes is such a . . . formality!
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 06:11 PM
Feb 2012

So much easier to just declare a winner. More efficient. The free market values efficiency, you know. If you have a problem with that, you're clearly some goddam socialist who hates capitalism!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
6. I agree--some of them come up between "complete waste of time" and "clusterfuck."
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 06:17 PM
Feb 2012

Why bother? Flip a coin, it would be just as representative!

Of course, Iowa and NH make a BUNDLE off their little contests--all those taxes from hotel receipts, restaurant tabs, bar bills, etc--it's in the millions, and it makes a difference to their economies, which is why they persist with their contests and their insistence on maintaining their place in the pecking order.

I can't see the point of Maine's little exercise, though--fewer than six thousand people making the call? That's just dumb.

 

the other one

(1,499 posts)
5. Those embarrassing Ron Paul voters
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 06:15 PM
Feb 2012

You've tried scrubbing, you've tried soaking - but nothing seems to work.

Here's the solution: don't count them!

(Disclaimer - I am not a Ron Paul supporter; neither are the people counting the republican votes)

 

Ian62

(604 posts)
10. Discredit GOP establishment
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 06:55 PM
Feb 2012

dig up anything else like this.
If u cannot trust them to run their OWN election fairly, how can you trust them to run the government fairly?

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
11. Webster's a fucking idiot like Gov. LePUKE, and the Maine GOP will get pounded in Nov.
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 06:57 PM
Feb 2012

Everyone up in Maine except for the TeaNuts have had about enough of Webster and Gov. LePage. Lord help them come November. They are going to get pounded out of sight.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maine GOP failed to count...