General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn 1961, one of my High School teachers in a small CA town,
was anonymously accused of being a Communist. He taught French and Spanish at our little high school, and was one of the nicest, most helpful teachers I remember from those days. An anonymous letter was sent to the school board by someone in the town, and this great teacher was almost fired from his job, based on an anonymous accusation. This was the environment at the time. People were Commie-crazy, looking for "Reds" under their beds and everywhere else.
Anyhow, a school board meeting/hearing was held about this. Nobody showed up to own up to the anonymous accusation. Many people, however, who knew this teacher, including me and a dozen or so other current students, did show up and provided our input in support of our teacher. My father went there, too, and spoke about the honesty and upstanding nature of the man.
Even so, the school board was actually taking this anonymous and unsupported accusation seriously, and came within a frog hair of firing one of the best teachers at that school. I never heard him say a single word about politics at all. I doubt he thought about it all that much. What he did talk about was the culture of France in our French classes. In the Spanish classes, he talked about differences between different Spanish-speaking countries, with regard to pronunciation, primarily.
In the end, he was not fired, but the entire thing took a toll on him, and he became far more reticent in the classroom and less creative with his teaching methods.
Anonymous accusations, without support, are often used in attempts to discredit people, often based on some personal animosity or some old grudge. It was wrong then, and it's wrong now.
olddots
(10,237 posts)It seemed to stop for a few months but never really stopped .
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Anonymous accusations of any kind should be discarded without a second thought. If someone has an accusation, that person should step forward publicly and make it, and then support it with actual information. Every accused person has the right to face his or her accuser. Anytime that is not the case, there should be no action whatever.
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 2, 2013, 03:04 PM - Edit history (2)
>>Anonymous accusations, without support, are often used in attempts to discredit people, often based on some personal animosity or some old grudge. It was wrong then, and it's wrong now.>>>>
In terms of that era... post McCarthy ti' the Goldwater movement... anti communism was at it's most idiotic, vicious, hysterical and destructive.
VN... which the anti-communist movement *caused* by making the DEMs ( Johnson, Kennedy, et al) bend over backwards to show how anti-communist they could be... paradoxically sent American anti-communism into relative remission when its showcase war turned into the bloody fiasco that sensible people were predicting it would be in the 50's.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)at other groups and individuals. Very sad.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)How many people have been accused of being "racist" or of being a "Paulbot" for refusing to toe the Official Party Line on NSA snooping?
Character assassination is alive and well.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)It is one of the reasons we have that whole "confront your accuser" thing somewhere in a law type document.
(There was a little bit of sarcasm there - hope it wasn't too subtle - lol!)
People forget history. There isn't a lot new under the sun when it comes to human nature....
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)That seems to be the case most of the time. History is only consulted in support of most people's opinions. When it doesn't offer that support, it is ignored.
Hence, our moronic war-making in the Middle East, where history teaches the futility of such activities there.