Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

20score

(4,769 posts)
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 09:32 PM Jul 2013

Trust US! When the Last Terrorist is Dead, You can have Your Freedom Back!



The only reason we, (we who are in power, and a few defense/security companies) are watching everything you do, everywhere you go, everything you read, say, buy, type, watch and all the people you contact, is to catch the terrorists. Once that job is done, you can trust that we will give you back your freedom, your Constitution and your privacy... Should be any day now.

Some people point out that one is more likely to be struck by lightning than to be killed by a terrorist within the last ten years. (True.) And that our country has faced far more dangerous threats in the past without tapping everybody’s phones and opening everyone’s mail.

Well, maybe they didn’t think of doing those things.

The point is to talk about something else, anything else, so we can go back to catching those last few terrorists. Thanks for your patriotic support!

(And Thom Rumpus from Akron, you’re watching too much porn!)
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trust US! When the Last Terrorist is Dead, You can have Your Freedom Back! (Original Post) 20score Jul 2013 OP
The only problem is, Americans are terorrists: Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #1
Thanks for the additional uses of "Terrorist" Pholus Jul 2013 #5
There's an article somewhere about DHS or FBI or all of them considering Occupy to be Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #8
Got that one. 800,000+ names on the initial level of Terrorism screening lists. Pholus Jul 2013 #9
WOW...the Quakers too? Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #11
Yup. Under Bush. But nothing to stop it from happening again... Pholus Jul 2013 #13
Means Nixon was a . . . GASP! Oh wait, Nixon WAS a terrorist if you HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #18
Chile, and on and on 20score Jul 2013 #31
So damned twisted. 20score Jul 2013 #14
Big brother making of mockery of our constitutional rights to assembly and dissent indepat Jul 2013 #33
Yes, that magical word, "Terror," woo me with science Jul 2013 #12
Thanks for the list! Pholus Jul 2013 #17
Damn. Thank you! Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #19
Thanks 20score Jul 2013 #23
I'll never understand how they think. 20score Jul 2013 #30
i dont really have much use for my "freedoms" BOG PERSON Jul 2013 #2
I wish we would stop making terrorists The Straight Story Jul 2013 #3
FBI is smart enough to have moved on from us normal" peole to people with mental illnesses and truedelphi Jul 2013 #16
I knew it! Hope they get him soon. punkin87 Jul 2013 #4
Why doesn't the US just invade the country of Terror? leftstreet Jul 2013 #6
Good idea. 20score Jul 2013 #25
Uh, thanks, I guess. At this rate... kenny blankenship Jul 2013 #7
It's a good thing we have terrorists. progressoid Jul 2013 #10
Just in time! 20score Jul 2013 #32
And when all the world's wealth is in the hands of 10 people. russspeakeasy Jul 2013 #15
I especially trust all the executives with the private security companies. gtar100 Jul 2013 #20
Brings tears to my eyes, also. 20score Jul 2013 #21
But by then, Freedom isn't Free will have a new meaning Jack Rabbit Jul 2013 #22
I wish that was satire :/ n/t whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #24
Me too. 20score Jul 2013 #27
Sounds like the Libertarians poured something into the drinking water railsback Jul 2013 #26
? 20score Jul 2013 #28
Kick suede1 Jul 2013 #29
Thanks for helping. 20score Jul 2013 #34
Another kick! suede1 Jul 2013 #35
KR Logical Jul 2013 #36
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
1. The only problem is, Americans are terorrists:
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 09:36 PM
Jul 2013
TransCanada Caught Training Police to Treat Peaceful Anti-Keystone XL Activists as 'Terrorists'
https://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2013/06/12-1


"We had terrorist in the Texas State Senate opposing SB 5" ~Bill Zedler, (R) Texas
http://twitpic.com/cz83k7/full

Pholus

(4,062 posts)
5. Thanks for the additional uses of "Terrorist"
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 09:44 PM
Jul 2013

I've been keeping a list. It is a common epithet to hurl these days.

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
8. There's an article somewhere about DHS or FBI or all of them considering Occupy to be
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 09:48 PM
Jul 2013

terrorists or potential terrorists, if you want to add another/haven't yet seen that. Here's another bit along those lines:

Cop strongly implies Occupy presence means increased terrorism threat; Federal agents at parade
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022137604

You know that eventually someone is going to try to use those "guidelines" against protesters, journalists, whistle-blowers etc., just as Bank of America this week attempted to jail a man 13 years for anti-bank messages written in =water-soluble children's sidewalk chalk=. They're champing at the bit to eliminate anyone who stands against them, it seems.

Pholus

(4,062 posts)
9. Got that one. 800,000+ names on the initial level of Terrorism screening lists.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 10:00 PM
Jul 2013
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/03/us-usa-security-database-idUSBRE94200720130503

At this point I find examples of "Terrorists" watch list entries who were:

Quaker anti-war protestors
Anti Iraq war protestors
Occupy Protestors
Anti Death-penalty protestors
Road ragers -- seriously. "Making Terroristic Threats"
Keystone XL pipeline protestors
Greenpeace
PETA

Here are two examples of "jokes" about branding people terrorists that may or may not be associated with their addition to the list

People complaining about their water quality
People filibustering on the Texas legislature's floor and in the gallery above them.

Pholus

(4,062 posts)
13. Yup. Under Bush. But nothing to stop it from happening again...
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 10:11 PM
Jul 2013
http://www.justice.gov/oig/special/s1009r.pdf

The main point being that the Terrorism label is used by LEO's as a cudgel -- exactly what practical effect this has on people who are not ACTUAL terrorists but get labeled as such is unclear.
 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
18. Means Nixon was a . . . GASP! Oh wait, Nixon WAS a terrorist if you
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 11:03 PM
Jul 2013

were Chilean, Vietnamese or Cambodian.

Funny and doubly ironic, I suppose.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
33. Big brother making of mockery of our constitutional rights to assembly and dissent
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 05:51 PM
Jul 2013

actions perceived to be illegal, unconstitutional, or otherwise not in the public interest by labeling lawful citizens as suspected heinous criminals. Such as this constitutes a loathsome malfeasance of office and abuse of power imo, one that strikes at the heart and soul of justice and the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and: it ain't a bit pretty.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
12. Yes, that magical word, "Terror,"
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 10:10 PM
Jul 2013


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2730165

with its magical, slippery meaning that shifts so easily with the situation. Surely only a real terrorist could ever be considered a person of interest. I believe the criteria are at least as stringent as for after-the-fact labeling of any young male as a "military combatant" after he has been slaughtered by a drone...


Surely a person would have to do something EGREGIOUS and TERRORISTIC before the government would EVER consider him worthy of any sort of scrutiny along those lines...




The NSA is building a massive data center in Utah to read every email you'll ever send.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002656593

Ridiculous FBI list: You might be a domestic terrorist if...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1790765

Doctors asked to identify potential terrorists under government plans
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1261120&mesg_id=1261120

Homeland Security Kept Tabs on Occupy Wall Street
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002466099

Do You Like Online Privacy? You May Be a Terrorist
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002257966

Top US counterterrorism official: drone critics are Al Qaeda enablers
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002279862

"Arrogant complaining about airport security is one indicator Transportation Security Administration officers consider when looking for possible criminals and terrorists"
http://www.cnn.com/2011/TRAVEL/04/15/tsa.screeners.complain/

etc., etc., etc...

BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
2. i dont really have much use for my "freedoms"
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 09:36 PM
Jul 2013

i wish we could trade them in for things we really wanted

where did that thread go about trading your privacy for a $50000 raise

i want to volunteer for that program

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
3. I wish we would stop making terrorists
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 09:39 PM
Jul 2013

Undercover FBI: "Hey, here's some bombs and 10,000 in cash if you and some friends will blow up this building"

perp: "no, I really don't think I could"

U-FBI: Keep after them until they agree. Arrest them and claim you stopped a terror attack and the patriot act is working. Meanwhile things like the Boston Bombing happen....

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
16. FBI is smart enough to have moved on from us normal" peole to people with mental illnesses and
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 10:51 PM
Jul 2013

Bi polar ailments. Those folks are easier to convince. Of course, the FBI agents still ave to drive them to the stores to pick up the needed goodies for the bombs, and what not. And then pick them u to drive them to the place where the bomb is to go off.

progressoid

(49,992 posts)
10. It's a good thing we have terrorists.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 10:02 PM
Jul 2013

Since the end of the cold war, the military industrial complex has needed a foe.

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
20. I especially trust all the executives with the private security companies.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 11:36 PM
Jul 2013

They must have signed a pledge to stop doing their profitable work the moment our safety goals have been met. Because I just know they have our best interests central to their mission. The sacrifices they endure must be tremendous.

 

railsback

(1,881 posts)
26. Sounds like the Libertarians poured something into the drinking water
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:28 AM
Jul 2013

Got all kinds of people talking gibberish.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trust US! When the Last T...