Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:25 AM Jul 2013

Marco Rubio To Introduce Abortion Bill In Senate: Report (U.S. Senate)


Marco Rubio To Introduce Abortion Bill In Senate: Report

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) will introduce a bill in the Senate banning abortions 20 weeks after conception, the Weekly Standard reported Tuesday.

According to the Weekly Standard report, Rubio will announce his sponsorship of the measure after Congress returns from the July 4 recess.

-snip-

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/02/marco-rubio-abortion_n_3537494.html


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Marco Rubio To Introduce Abortion Bill In Senate: Report (U.S. Senate) (Original Post) Tx4obama Jul 2013 OP
A question on this whole debate: How far along would someone say The Straight Story Jul 2013 #1
Yes but newfie11 Jul 2013 #3
Kicking theHandpuppet Jul 2013 #2

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
1. A question on this whole debate: How far along would someone say
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:42 AM
Jul 2013

an abortion should not be performed?

6 months? 7? 8? 9?

The fear is that once you establish a timeline there will be more and new restrictions. A fear others have on other issues I might add.

Anyone personally have a point they see as no return on such things?

When my X gf and I split up I found out she was pregnant and didn't know it until the day before. She was on birth control but had been taking meds for an oral surgery she had that counteracted the pill. She was five months along. She was overweight (and I don't mean that in a negative way) and didn't realize that she was pregnant until she went to the dr.

She made the choice (a good one imho) to keep the baby and we now have a wonderful daughter (long story). We went together to get the ultrasound and found out it was a girl. It was not an 'it' at that time and was well formed.

Being that it was she that had to bear the child and such I had no input, nor offered any.

Personally though, I feel at some point it is no longer a simple organism but something more alive and complex - something dependent on the person who holds it and can decide life or death (can something die if it has not been born yet?).

What is that point? Who should have a say in such a thing? Should we, not could we, be able to make the decision up until the time of actual birth?

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
3. Yes but
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 08:33 AM
Jul 2013

The woman that died in Ireland because she was denied an abortion is another perspective.

There cannot be a one size fits all law.
This is dangerous territory.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marco Rubio To Introduce ...