General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrance issues weasel apology to Bolivia
Last edited Thu Jul 4, 2013, 08:55 AM - Edit history (2)
The OAS is demanding answers. UNASUR is still in a meeting but their reaction will be firm.This weasel *apology* is a small step up from the total lies France was telling last night using *anonymous officials* who could not reveal their names *due to department policy* blah blah to deny that they had refused permission to fly over their airspace. It's still not an honest apology and I hope Bolivia and UNASUR pursue this. I made an OP on this to cut down on the pathetic talking point that this was all in President Morales' imagination, or that he had to land because he was out of fuel. Shame on anyone dishonest enough to repeat those untruths when the information has been repeatedly presented.
Bolivian protesters threw stones at the French embassy in La Paz and burned the French and European flags
France has apologised to Bolivia for refusing to allow President Evo Morales' jet into its airspace, blaming "conflicting information".
...
Speaking in Berlin, French President Francois Hollande said he granted permission as soon as he knew it was Mr Morales' plane.
...
The French foreign ministry issued a statement on the incident.
Ministry spokesman Philippe Lalliot said: "The foreign minister called his Bolivian counterpart to tell him about France's regrets after the incident caused by the late confirmation of permission for President Morales' plane to fly over (French) territory."
...
Demonstrators marched on the French embassy in La Paz, burning the French flag and demanding the expulsion of the ambassador to Bolivia.
...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-23174874
Fabius expressed Frances regrets following the temporary problems that occurred for President Morales because of delays in confirming authorization to fly over (French) territory.
http://globalnews.ca/news/688968/bolivia-plane-incident-infuriates-latin-america/
AFP | Jul 4, 2013, 04.08 AM IST
PARIS: France told Bolivia Wednesday it was sorry that President Evo Morales' jet was refused entry into French airspace forcing it to make an unscheduled stopover in Vienna.
"The foreign minister called his Bolivian counterpart to tell him about France's regrets after the incident caused by the late confirmation of permission for President Morales' plane to fly over (French) territory," said ministry spokesman Philippe Lalliot in a statement. The flight from Moscow was diverted late Tuesday to Vienna on suspicion it was harbouring fugitive US intelligence leaker Edward Snowden, who is wanted by the United States.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/France-regrets-refusing-Bolivian-president-airspace-entry-Ministry/articleshow/20903826.cms
UPDATE to add official French Statement:
3 July 2013 - Bolivia / Plane permission to fly over French territory
Statement by the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The minister of foreign affairs telephoned his Bolivian counterpart to extend to him Frances apologies following the setback experienced by President Morales as a result of the delay in granting the presidents plane permission to fly over French territory. He provided him with the necessary clarifications regarding this incident.
He underscored that the authorization to fly over French territory was granted as soon as the French authorities had been informed that the aircraft in question was that of President Morales. He also indicated to him that there had, of course, never been any intention of refusing President Moraless plane access to our airspace; President Morales is always welcome in our country.
Our relations with Bolivia are marked by trust and friendship. President Moraless visit to France in March, marked by a very friendly meeting with President Hollande, provided an opportunity to underscore our shared political determination to give new impetus to the partnership between our two countries. In that spirit, the two ministers expressed their determination to continue strengthening French-Bolivian relations.
http://www.franceonu.org/france-at-the-united-nations/un-express-922/article/3-july-2013-bolivia-plane
Such Bullshit. How many HOURS does it take French intel to find out that was a Presidential jet? Especially when Latin American heads of state were calling their European counterparts all night?
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts).
Catherina
(35,568 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Certain posters have informed me that the story of the French blocking his plane was "total bullshit".
Goodness, this is all so confusing
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Some folks have head fully in sand
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)I wouldn't trust them if they said night was dark and day was light.
byeya
(2,842 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)It is confusing....
and they seem to be very prolific posters as well
Romulus Quirinus
(524 posts)with a side portfolio focussing on discussion forums, I'd lighting bolt the hell out of animated smileys.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)Black and white print is so confusing to some people. And it's always the same people lol.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)What on Earth are we all supposed to THINK?
magellan
(13,257 posts)...for anyone who's genuinely interested. Notice it turned back to Vienna shortly before reaching Italian airspace (red line, lower left corner, is the Italian border with Austria; FAB1 marker is the landing at Vienna). Italy was the first overfly country that denied the Bolivian President's plane access to its airspace. France, Spain and Portugal also denied access; they were the following three countries the plane had to overfly to reach its refueling stop in the Canary Islands.
You can also replay the flight here. Speed it up using the control at the bottom.
http://www.flightradar24.com/2013-07-02/16:37/48x/48.11,16.58/7#!/2013-07-02/16:35/FAB1
The flight takes off from Moscow at 16:35. At roughly 18:50 it passes Vienna. 20 minutes or so later at around 19:10, it suddenly turns back, and it lands in Vienna at approximately 22:00. Please note those times. The plane turned back around 20 minutes after passing Vienna, but it's a good 45 minutes before it lands. What was it doing for that additional time? Circling Vienna, waiting for a slot to land. And probably becoming very worried that Austria too would refuse access.
Now, some are making much about the conversation between the Vienna ATC and the pilot about a fuel indicator problem. If you listen to the entire 2:17 recording, it becomes obvious that this conversation occurred just before ATC gives landing instructions and the runway number. That's done on approach, not miles and miles out. Vienna ATC would have had further contact with the pilot beforehand seeing as the plane was circling in its airspace, but we don't hear any of that. It's only the 2:17 minutes just before landing that was recorded, and it's within that time that the fuel indicator problem is first raised. In fact, it was this flight precaution that prompted Vienna to clear the decks and land the plane asap. (It would also preclude Vienna from denying landing rights; a plane in trouble is given priority.)
I hate to inject logic into the discussion, but at one time DU was known for its ability to separate the wheat from the chaff. I'm sorry to say that there's some objectivity lacking nowadays, simply because we have a Dem in the WH.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)So I was told here?
Freedom fries for everybody!
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)Oh France, DeGaulle is rolling in his grave right now!
muriel_volestrangler
(101,332 posts)And, in that case, they must have considered what plane it was - a Bolivian Air Force jet (unarmed, of course), used for transporting Bolivian officials. They'd get that from the basic flight information.
It is possible that the order to stop it hadn't gone through Hollande, and that he did say "let it in, It's Morales" as soon as he found out what was going on. But someone knew this was a flight likely to be carrying the Bolivian president (because, if they're concerned with Snowden, they'd know Morales had been in Moscow, talking about Snowden, that day) - and made the decision to exclude it.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)They knew what plane it was and where it was going before it left the ground...all planes file a flight plan with air traffic control...and every plane has a transponder that identifies it to ATC...so they knew it was coming well in advance.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)malaise
(269,096 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)Affaire Snowden : Paris présente ses "regrets" pour l'escale forcée du président bolivien
Le Monde | 03.07.2013 à 05h58 Mis à jour le 03.07.2013 à 22h32
The 13-hour forced landing of the plane of the Bolivian president, Evo Morales, in Vienna after four European countries (France, Portugal, Spain and Italy) refused to open their airspace, raises the ire of Bolivians and a wave of protest from South American governments.
In reprisals, the Bolivian Parliament is going to, among other things, request the expulstion of the French, Portugues and Italian Ambassadors from the country.
En représailles, le Parlement bolivien va en outre demander l'expulsion du pays des ambassadeurs de France, du Portugal et d'Italie.
http://www.lemonde.fr/ameriques/article/2013/07/03/une-rumeur-sur-snowden-provoque-une-crise-diplomatique-entre-paris-et-la-paz_3440849_3222.html
Still weasel phrasing. They didn't "refuse to open their airspace" as if it was a last minute request. They rescinded authorization to fly into that airspace. Big difference.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)Though not surprising.
And this info is consistent with earlier posts that pointed out that France's earlier statements indicated that the plane was first refused permission.
K&R.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)The masks fell to the floor and they're flailing in picking them up again.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)They've got to find a new way to spin this...
...probably by smearing Evo Morales as a dirty commie hippie.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)Russia condemns France, Spain, Portugal for blocking Morales's flight
Russia on Thursday condemned France, Spain and Portugal for blocking the flight from Moscow to La Paz of Bolivian President Evo Morales, over suspicions that US intelligence leaker Edward Snowden was on board.
"The action of the French, Spanish and Portuguese authorities can hardly be viewed as a friendly step toward Bolivia or Russia," the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement.
...
"The denial of overfly rights to the aircraft could have created a threat to the security of the onboard passengers, including the head of a sovereign state," the Russian foreign ministry statement said.
...
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130704/russia-condemns-france-spain-portugal-blocking-moraless-flight-0
http://www.itar-tass.com/en/c32/795823.html
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)I can't find the complete statement yet.
Thanks
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Heavens. You know, sometimes I think some people on this message board are just telling complete WHOPPERS!
Catherina
(35,568 posts)That that type of idiotic support, is it any wonder this administration just created an embarrassing international spectacle that showed the whole world how much disregard our government has for international law or truth? And the US press scrambling to cover for them with distortions and omissions just lost much of the credibility it had on any matter.
Such a stupid, stupid, offensive thing to do.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)You're tops. Happy 4th!
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... will be along soon, with a dozen or so link back to it's own posts that will clear up your "confusion."
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I refused anything except a real response. Poor thing folded, and couldn't answer.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)with the Brits, that other old Empire, when they at first thought they could raid the Ecuadoran Embassy, then had to back away as wiser heads pointed out the total stupidity of such a move.
But they wanted so badly to do it, raid a S.A. Embassy or take down the plane of an 'uppity' President of a former colonial state. They can't get used to the fact that they lost control of many of their former colonies and that all over the world, people are fighting to free themselves from their stranglehold on their governments.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)the needs of wealthy and powerful economic interests, tyranny and despotism result.
What is blatantly obvious from this entire NSA debacle is that we the people must take matters into our own hands and strip all power from the global wealthy private interests that control and coordinate the transnational corporations, governments, and economies of the world.
Power corrupts, and absolute power has clearly corrupted absolutely. It is totally up to us to fix it.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Happy Independence Day
suffragette
(12,232 posts)http://www.plenglish.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1578551&Itemid=1
The United States and the involved European countries were aware that the ex agent was not aboard the plane since they have enough means and their own intelligence structure, Morales noted.
Drew Richards
(1,558 posts)Obfucation of the events, in this thread, at least so far...
If I was like them I would link back to my analysis post from the original statements that came out that night so everyone can see the evolution by certain posters to muddy the waters...but instead, your straight fact based posts have them scurrying for their next talking points...
My guess is they will now attack Morales on everything they can to distract from the fact that this is a really big deal no matter who it happened to or what politics or country they came from.
Drew