Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDusting Off the Declaration
Gordon S. Wood reviews
American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence
by Pauline Maier
Scholars who talk about Americas civic religion often dont appreciate the half of it. Not only have we Americans turned profane political beliefs into a hallowed religious-like creed, but we have transformed very secular and temporal documents into sacred scriptures. We have even built a temple to preserve and display the great documents consecrating the founding of the American creedthe Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. At the National Archives in Washington, D.C., these holy texts are enshrined in massive, bronze-framed, bulletproof, moisture-controlled glass containers that have been drained of all harmful oxygen. During the day these Charters of Freedom are on display in the rotunda of the National Archives for the faithful to pay homage to; but at night the documents and their containers are lowered into a vault of reinforced concrete and steel that is twenty-two feet deep and weighs fifty-five tons. Once inside the vault with the huge doors on top swung shut, the scriptural texts, the National Archives assures us, are safe.
Pauline Maier opens her history of the making of the Declaration of Independence, the most sacred of these documents, with this vivid description of the rotunda of the National Archives. In Maiers eyes the shrine where the documents are displayed resembles nothing so much as the awesome, gilded, pre-Vatican II altars of her Catholic girlhood, raised three steps above where the worshippers assembled. The whole shrine seems to belong in a Baroque church somewhere in Rome. On the altars surface are spread out the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but at the center of the shrine, held above the altar in what looks like a tabernacle or monstrance, is the most holy document of allthe Declaration of Independence. Every day hundreds of believers file by the altar looking up reverentially at this document, as if it were handed down by God or were the work of superhuman men whose talents far exceeded those of any who followed them.
Maier, as an experienced student of the American Revolution, has no patience with the quasi-religious adoration of a document whose actual historical origins she has come to know so well. She is uncomfortable, she says, with the use of religious words and images for what are, after all, things of this world. The whole business of erecting a shrine for the worship of the Declaration of Independence strikes her as idolatrous, and also curiously at odds with the values of the Revolution, which was suspicious of Catholic iconographic practices. More important, the Declaration of Independence seems to her to be peculiarly unsuited for the role that it eventually came to play in Americaas a statement of basic principles for the guidance of an established society. At the beginning, in 1776, it was not meant to be that at all.
In her book Maier wants Americans to know that the Declaration of Independence was created by human beings just like them and that they are its masters, not its supplicants. She wants to liberate the Declaration from its tomb by recovering the actual historical circumstances of its creation, circumstances whose mundane nature puts the origins of the Declaration greatly at odds with the seemingly religious character it later acquired. In confronting this contradiction Maier found herself with two different but related stories to tellthat of the original making of the Declaration of Independence and that of its remaking into the document most Americans know, remember, and revere. Her book thus presents a classic example of the longstanding conflict between history and heritage that David Lowenthal has recently described in a superb study.1
Pauline Maier opens her history of the making of the Declaration of Independence, the most sacred of these documents, with this vivid description of the rotunda of the National Archives. In Maiers eyes the shrine where the documents are displayed resembles nothing so much as the awesome, gilded, pre-Vatican II altars of her Catholic girlhood, raised three steps above where the worshippers assembled. The whole shrine seems to belong in a Baroque church somewhere in Rome. On the altars surface are spread out the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but at the center of the shrine, held above the altar in what looks like a tabernacle or monstrance, is the most holy document of allthe Declaration of Independence. Every day hundreds of believers file by the altar looking up reverentially at this document, as if it were handed down by God or were the work of superhuman men whose talents far exceeded those of any who followed them.
Maier, as an experienced student of the American Revolution, has no patience with the quasi-religious adoration of a document whose actual historical origins she has come to know so well. She is uncomfortable, she says, with the use of religious words and images for what are, after all, things of this world. The whole business of erecting a shrine for the worship of the Declaration of Independence strikes her as idolatrous, and also curiously at odds with the values of the Revolution, which was suspicious of Catholic iconographic practices. More important, the Declaration of Independence seems to her to be peculiarly unsuited for the role that it eventually came to play in Americaas a statement of basic principles for the guidance of an established society. At the beginning, in 1776, it was not meant to be that at all.
In her book Maier wants Americans to know that the Declaration of Independence was created by human beings just like them and that they are its masters, not its supplicants. She wants to liberate the Declaration from its tomb by recovering the actual historical circumstances of its creation, circumstances whose mundane nature puts the origins of the Declaration greatly at odds with the seemingly religious character it later acquired. In confronting this contradiction Maier found herself with two different but related stories to tellthat of the original making of the Declaration of Independence and that of its remaking into the document most Americans know, remember, and revere. Her book thus presents a classic example of the longstanding conflict between history and heritage that David Lowenthal has recently described in a superb study.1
******
====================================================
I love these reviews in NYRB.
I had a student who started off her paper on judicial interpretation by claiming that the constitution was divinely inspired.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 472 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post