Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This medical examiner is making me laugh. (Original Post) bravenak Jul 2013 OP
oh ya handmade34 Jul 2013 #1
I hope he's not the last witness. Not exactly a good way for the state to end. Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #2
It's entertaining. bravenak Jul 2013 #13
He's kind of bizarre.....not sure what I would think of him if I was on the jury. Gin Jul 2013 #3
Why doesn't he want to share his notes? bravenak Jul 2013 #10
The defense attorney seems to want to make him say things Just Saying Jul 2013 #4
i'm loving this guy CatWoman Jul 2013 #5
Me too! Little Star Jul 2013 #7
He's a tough cookie! Just Saying Jul 2013 #8
He is very precise. femmocrat Jul 2013 #6
testifying from notes?? KurtNYC Jul 2013 #9
This is so weird pintobean Jul 2013 #11
The "expert" on MSNBC says this is odd Just Saying Jul 2013 #14
as long as he prepared the notes for his own use KurtNYC Jul 2013 #17
I got destroyed in a trial by having a medical expert get on the stand with their own, undisclosed AngryAmish Jul 2013 #65
The notes thing has me dying! bravenak Jul 2013 #12
He's not happy pintobean Jul 2013 #16
He probably knows the notes will take up their time. bravenak Jul 2013 #33
Well, he just did pipi_k Jul 2013 #15
Perhaps he wrote in the margin: "West is a poopy head!" KurtNYC Jul 2013 #18
snort tavernier Jul 2013 #23
Maybe... pipi_k Jul 2013 #26
i just spit water all over my monitor CatWoman Jul 2013 #39
The prosecutors in this case have been like the Keystone Kops, premium Jul 2013 #20
Is it your educated guess Vattel Jul 2013 #35
It's my belief that he committed Manslaughter premium Jul 2013 #37
Yes, it is looking that way. N/T GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #40
Thanks for the clarification. Vattel Jul 2013 #41
Not sure if you're agreeing with me or not, premium Jul 2013 #43
Well, I agree with you that he should be acquitted. Vattel Jul 2013 #44
Ok, I understand now, premium Jul 2013 #46
I don't see how a reasonable juror could do anything but acquit. Vattel Jul 2013 #47
Agree 100%. premium Jul 2013 #48
What would it take to prove it wasn't self defense? dkf Jul 2013 #53
What would it take? premium Jul 2013 #55
They could conclude a reasonable person would not have shot an unarmed, skinny Hoyt Jul 2013 #66
It would have been far more interesting if the avebury Jul 2013 #19
It would have been interesting premium Jul 2013 #22
I don't blame the guy for trying to think avebury Jul 2013 #31
Yep, premium Jul 2013 #34
Much like when GZ shot himself in the foot by... LanternWaste Jul 2013 #50
And that has what to do with the case? premium Jul 2013 #56
Shiping Bao is from China. N/T GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #38
In that case... pipi_k Jul 2013 #45
He is the worst expert witness EVER. jessie04 Jul 2013 #21
This whole trial is, IMHO, premium Jul 2013 #24
You have extensive experience in criminal court, I assume ? russspeakeasy Jul 2013 #29
I do, premium Jul 2013 #32
I have testified as an expert in dental cases more than 50 times, PCIntern Jul 2013 #42
My only experience was being on a jury for four days. russspeakeasy Jul 2013 #67
It can definitely be frustrating at times, premium Jul 2013 #68
Yes...I do. jessie04 Jul 2013 #36
He's decided to spend his lunch break pintobean Jul 2013 #25
We have some meta note taking going on. bravenak Jul 2013 #30
I have no problem with a ME using notes, but those notes must be made available for lawyers on uppityperson Jul 2013 #27
So far we've seen a lot of incompetence and/or racism from the police to the state's attorney - hedgehog Jul 2013 #28
No, he is too pompous to think himself wrong, tavernier Jul 2013 #61
The comedy show is back on pintobean Jul 2013 #49
"retarded" is a pejorative DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2013 #51
I love the guy Marrah_G Jul 2013 #52
as do I CatWoman Jul 2013 #58
I like the Medical Examiner. He just won't let avebury Jul 2013 #60
The defense is on a bogus issue now. madaboutharry Jul 2013 #54
he's also asking about Trayvon's "length" and Body Mass Index (which is 22) CatWoman Jul 2013 #57
He makes every single thing seem like it is suspect. Marrah_G Jul 2013 #63
He reminds me of Max on Hawaii Five-0. madaboutharry Jul 2013 #59
This is embarrassingly difficult to watch. jessie04 Jul 2013 #62
I don't think he is an idiot. madaboutharry Jul 2013 #64

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
2. I hope he's not the last witness. Not exactly a good way for the state to end.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:36 AM
Jul 2013

Trayvon's brother or mother would have been a much better final witness imho.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
13. It's entertaining.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:54 AM
Jul 2013

My husband thinks the ME wrote a book and wants to sell it. I shouldn't laugh.

Gin

(7,212 posts)
3. He's kind of bizarre.....not sure what I would think of him if I was on the jury.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:40 AM
Jul 2013

He seems very defensive.

Just Saying

(1,799 posts)
4. The defense attorney seems to want to make him say things
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:42 AM
Jul 2013

And he's just not having it.

Frankly, these defense attorneys are boring as hell and seem like assholes. Just my impressions from this trial.

Just Saying

(1,799 posts)
8. He's a tough cookie!
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:47 AM
Jul 2013

I'm sure it gets old working hard to do an important job and defense attorneys always trying to accuse you of mistakes.

He's doing well, IMO. I think jurors understand that this isn't his only corpse, and he's not going to remember a specific day. Defense attorney looks like a huge jerk pushing this and if I was a juror I would be asking "What's the freaking point???"

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
6. He is very precise.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:45 AM
Jul 2013

Spelling out words, clarifying the difference between fact and opinion..... He can't be rattled.

Just Saying

(1,799 posts)
14. The "expert" on MSNBC says this is odd
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:56 AM
Jul 2013

But idk. I guess she says having the report is typical but not to have notes. I honestly don't see why it matters. Have you ever seen these reports? There's a lot of info so I could see why someone might want a cliff notes version. It's HIS notes from HIS reports anyway.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
17. as long as he prepared the notes for his own use
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:00 PM
Jul 2013

I don't have an issue but Defense may try to portray the notes as coaching or in some other way improper.

They may also find some questions that the ME wrote for himself that they didn't think of and want to use.

West took his notes from him like an 8th grade teacher would -- "this test is NOT open book! See me after class!"

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
65. I got destroyed in a trial by having a medical expert get on the stand with their own, undisclosed
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:41 PM
Jul 2013

notes. Other side was calling them a cheat sheet and it just looked and felt awful.

I made that mistake in my third trial. Never again - but witnesses who are not professional witnesses always try to do that. It is a crutch for them. They don't need it.

poor guy

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
15. Well, he just did
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:57 AM
Jul 2013

something very very stupid...

He brought his own personal notes in, referred to them, then insisted that the defense NOT be allowed to see them.

He is looking nervous.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
26. Maybe...
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:08 PM
Jul 2013

or maybe not.

In any case, it certainly appears that the prosecution hasn't given their own witnesses much guidance on courtroom procedure.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
20. The prosecutors in this case have been like the Keystone Kops,
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:03 PM
Jul 2013

inept and clownish. I'll be shocked if GZ is convicted of anything, the jury must be shaking their heads and wondering why the prosecution would expect them to convict this guy.

For the record, because I've been accused of defending GZ, I think he's guilty of Manslaughter, not 2nd Murder.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
35. Is it your educated guess
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:19 PM
Jul 2013

that Zimmerman committed manslaughter? Or do you think that the prosecution can actually prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman's behavior did not meet the legal standard in Florida for justifiable self-defense? Personally, I don't know what Zimmerman actually did, but barring any surprises in what remains of the trial, it seems clear to me that he should be acquitted because there is no way the prosecution has come even close to proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman's behavior was not justifiable self-defense.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
37. It's my belief that he committed Manslaughter
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:26 PM
Jul 2013

based upon what I know of the facts so far, but, barring any last minute revelations from the prosecutor, the state hasn't met the burden of proof, hasn't proven it's case beyond a reasonable doubt and for those reasons, he should be acquitted, which is what I think is going to happen.
The state bowed to public pressure and charged him with 2nd Murder, which they had to know they couldn't prove, and now, they're, IMHO, are going to look like inept fools if Zimmerman is acquitted, which, at this point, is a very distinct possibility.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
41. Thanks for the clarification.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:30 PM
Jul 2013

Having read many of your posts, I thought you were too reasonable and well-informed to think that, based on what we have seen in the trial thus far, Zimmerman should be convicted. And you have proven me correct!

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
43. Not sure if you're agreeing with me or not,
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:39 PM
Jul 2013

could you clarify for me. Thanks.

Just for the record, I think he should be convicted of Manslaughter, but I fear this isn't going to happen because of the lousy job the prosecution is doing.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
44. Well, I agree with you that he should be acquitted.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:42 PM
Jul 2013

I really have no idea whether Zimmerman is guilty of manslaughter or not. If I were forced to guess and my life depended on guessing correctly, I would be sweating big time either way I went.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
46. Ok, I understand now,
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:49 PM
Jul 2013

and whether or not he's guilty, he should be acquitted because the state hasn't met the burden of proof or proven it's case beyond a reasonable doubt.

These jurors must be thinking, REALLY? You want us to convict on what you've presented so far?

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
47. I don't see how a reasonable juror could do anything but acquit.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:16 PM
Jul 2013

Trying to make the case that Zimmerman did not reasonably fear great bodily harm or death would be the prosecution's best approach, but given that eyewitness and other testimony place Zimmerman on his back with Martin on top, and given that Zimmerman's injuries suggest that Martin might have forced Zimmerman's head into the sidewalk (even if not as many times as Zimmerman claimed), and given that no one can show that Zimmerman did not perceive Martin reaching for his gun, proving beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not reasonably fear great bodily harm or death is no easy task. And by going for murder 2, the prosecution have set themselves the clearly impossible task of showing that Zimmerman started the fight.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
48. Agree 100%.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:27 PM
Jul 2013

These have got to be the worse prosecutor's I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot of prosecutors.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
53. What would it take to prove it wasn't self defense?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:14 PM
Jul 2013

That is such a difficult judgement call to say you believe beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman did not a reasonsable belief he was in danger of serious bodily harm.

With the evidence as presented that is such a high bar.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
55. What would it take?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:19 PM
Jul 2013

For me, it would take a witness that actually saw the event go down, or a video of the whole incident.
It's just my opinion that the prosecution has totally flubbed the case and I don't see how the jury can convict Zimmerman of either 2nd Murder or Manslaughter.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
66. They could conclude a reasonable person would not have shot an unarmed, skinny
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:50 PM
Jul 2013

kid, not to mention grabbing a gun and stalking him, trying to say he feared for his armed, MMA trained life because of minor scratches, etc.

Then, again, there will be at least one bigot on the jury, and likely a few gun lovers who could see themselves screwing up and shooting a kid with no justification.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
19. It would have been far more interesting if the
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:02 PM
Jul 2013

medical examiner had prepared his notes in his original language (which I imagine was not English). Then watch the face of the Defense Attorneys as they try to figure out what they guy wrote.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
31. I don't blame the guy for trying to think
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:12 PM
Jul 2013

about what different questions he could be asked on the stand and making his own notes. However, he should not have brought them into the courtroom.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
34. Yep,
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jul 2013

bringing them into the courtroom gives the defense the right to see them and question the witness on the veracity of his notes.
This witness, IMO, is a clown, and, once again, the prosecution has shot itself in the foot.
Ya gotta wonder by now if the state is trying to purposely trying to throw this case.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
50. Much like when GZ shot himself in the foot by...
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:42 PM
Jul 2013

he prosecution has shot itself in the foot...." Much like when GZ shot himself in the foot by attempting to illegally transfer money from his jail cell...

"Ya gotta wonder" if Zimmerman was purposely trying to throw the case too...

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
56. And that has what to do with the case?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:24 PM
Jul 2013

That's not going to be presented at trial as it's irrelevant to the case.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
45. In that case...
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:43 PM
Jul 2013

I would imagine the court would have called in a translator.

You don't introduce stuff into court and get away with it not being evidence available to both sides.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
32. I do,
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:14 PM
Jul 2013

I've testified in numerous criminal cases, for the prosecution and defense, and this guy is, IMO, a fucking clown.

PCIntern

(25,550 posts)
42. I have testified as an expert in dental cases more than 50 times,
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:32 PM
Jul 2013

and I just sat mouth agape the entire time.

That was the worst performance I've ever seen, and believe me, I've seen what I thought, was everything. Until today.

I cannot tell you how many times I sat on the stand, wishing I'd had my notes in front of me, but COULD NOT.

russspeakeasy

(6,539 posts)
67. My only experience was being on a jury for four days.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:28 PM
Jul 2013

It was hard to keep from hollering at some of the witness'
I thought they were the dumbest fucks I had ever heard..

After listening for another hour to the ME, on the GZ case, you are right, I was wrong. He was/is a fucking clown.

 

premium

(3,731 posts)
68. It can definitely be frustrating at times,
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 12:06 AM
Jul 2013

I've been retired for a few years now so I don't have to do the court thing anymore.

 

jessie04

(1,528 posts)
36. Yes...I do.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:22 PM
Jul 2013

You are trained to answer the question and ONLY the question.

This guy is all over the map.

If you don't know, say I don't know.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
25. He's decided to spend his lunch break
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:08 PM
Jul 2013

making notes about his notes. We've just entered the twilight zone.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
27. I have no problem with a ME using notes, but those notes must be made available for lawyers on
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:10 PM
Jul 2013

both sides.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
28. So far we've seen a lot of incompetence and/or racism from the police to the state's attorney -
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:11 PM
Jul 2013

does the testimony sound like the medical examiner is trying to cover up a half-assed job?

tavernier

(12,388 posts)
61. No, he is too pompous to think himself wrong,
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:35 PM
Jul 2013

but it sure looks like there was some half-assing going on since this guy was responsible for the techs, but admits not knowing what they were doing in this and any other case.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
51. "retarded" is a pejorative
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:49 PM
Jul 2013

It's in the same category as the n-word, the f-word, and the k-word.

That being said the M E is coming off as a buffoon.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
60. I like the Medical Examiner. He just won't let
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:34 PM
Jul 2013

Knock Knock lead him down the garden path. I think that the Knock Knock is getting pretty frustrated with him.

madaboutharry

(40,211 posts)
54. The defense is on a bogus issue now.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:15 PM
Jul 2013

When an autopsy is done, they aren't going to take a photo of every single part of body. That photos will be taken when there is something to take a picture of. The defense knows this.

CatWoman

(79,302 posts)
57. he's also asking about Trayvon's "length" and Body Mass Index (which is 22)
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:24 PM
Jul 2013

West is coming off like he's fishing for any and EVERY thing.

This is why I find this ME so entertaining (and credible).

He's not having any of West's shit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This medical examiner is ...