Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OhioChick

(23,218 posts)
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:16 PM Jul 2013

Health insurers fear young people will opt out

July 05, 2013 at 11:28 AM

MIAMI -- Dan Lopez rarely gets sick and hasn't been to a doctor in 10 years, so buying health insurance feels like a waste of money.

Even after the federal health overhaul takes full effect next year, the 24-year-old said he will probably decide to pay the $100 penalty for those who skirt the law's requirement that all Americans purchase coverage.

"I don't feel I should pay for something I don't use," said the Milwaukee resident, who makes about $48,000 a year working two part-time jobs.

Because he makes too much to qualify for government subsidies, Lopez would pay a premium of about $3,000 a year if he chose to buy health insurance.

More: http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2013/07/health_insurers_fear_young_peo.html#incart_river_default

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Health insurers fear young people will opt out (Original Post) OhioChick Jul 2013 OP
Young people are notoriously short-sighted IMHO Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2013 #1
This is a very serious problem Vietnameravet Jul 2013 #2
That's the thing about Single Payer - it would just be deducted like Social Security. djean111 Jul 2013 #13
you want to take peoples homes for not buying private insurance? backwoodsbob Jul 2013 #21
kinda re-defines the sense of "community", doesn't it? dixiegrrrrl Jul 2013 #27
From the start, wasn't it pretty well determined many young people wouldn't sign up KittyWampus Jul 2013 #29
Apparently you'd prefer they get treated for free at the hospital then? House of Roberts Jul 2013 #30
Thanks House... I was beginning to wonder if people here can read English! Vietnameravet Jul 2013 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author Vietnameravet Jul 2013 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author Vietnameravet Jul 2013 #33
Did you really read what i posted? Vietnameravet Jul 2013 #38
Paying the penalty is paying into the system. KittyWampus Jul 2013 #28
Not much..and i dont think they will enforce it Vietnameravet Jul 2013 #37
There are young people who can afford insurance? n/t winter is coming Jul 2013 #3
Gee, ya know what could solve this problem? Cal Carpenter Jul 2013 #4
+ 1,000 (n/t) spin Jul 2013 #15
Yes it could Vietnameravet Jul 2013 #34
+1000000 n/t Catherina Jul 2013 #39
I thought the penalty was 1% taught_me_patience Jul 2013 #5
The fine slides up with time until it reaches the full amount. TheKentuckian Jul 2013 #8
Income Tax compliance will fall precipitously as the fine increases. kenny blankenship Jul 2013 #35
While worthy of discussion, also bear in mind that this is just the "other side of the coin" in the silvershadow Jul 2013 #6
and part-time too!! taught_me_patience Jul 2013 #10
You're probably right. Just an example...from a PR firm or advertising firm or some such...nt silvershadow Jul 2013 #12
This article is complete bullshit on all levels taught_me_patience Jul 2013 #7
The fine for being uninsured should roughly equal the yearly cost of premiums tritsofme Jul 2013 #9
Maybe the INSURERS should match the penalty fee leftstreet Jul 2013 #11
Blah Blah indeed. tritsofme Jul 2013 #14
You want harsher punishment for people who don't buy insurance leftstreet Jul 2013 #16
If the youngest and healthiest are able to opt out of the system with little cost tritsofme Jul 2013 #18
LOL there shouldn't BE any premiums leftstreet Jul 2013 #20
That is not our reality. tritsofme Jul 2013 #24
"Our reality" is there are no jobs, and wages are shit leftstreet Jul 2013 #25
I guess a car accident scenario doesn't cross his mind? Arugula Latte Jul 2013 #17
Didn't happen in Massachusetts frazzled Jul 2013 #19
Don't pin this shit on the young people mick063 Jul 2013 #22
Isn't it mandatory. nt Deep13 Jul 2013 #23
We need single payer - at least then he would be required to contribute more in taxes to pay for it. cbdo2007 Jul 2013 #26
He's a fool to not have insurance, since he really should be able to afford it. Quantess Jul 2013 #36

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
1. Young people are notoriously short-sighted IMHO
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:18 PM
Jul 2013

They'll sing a different tune, however, if and when they get involved in an unexepected car wreck or find out they have a serious medical condition that they didn't anticipate. I was raised to believe that having some kind of health insurance was a responsible thing to do as part of self-care.

 

Vietnameravet

(1,085 posts)
2. This is a very serious problem
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:22 PM
Jul 2013

If the young health opt out then only the older ones will stay..and since insurance companies have to cover everyone the premiums will rise..
The only penalty for not having health insurance is only a $100 fine per year so this might happen...

This is a real threat to the success of Obamacare and of course the GOP will do all they can to screw the program...

Okay if they want to opt out then fine but damn it if they need treatment we better damn well make sure they have their wages garnished or house attached for payment!
No more free rides for anyone that doesnt want to pay into the system..



 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
13. That's the thing about Single Payer - it would just be deducted like Social Security.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:45 PM
Jul 2013

Obamacare will never be "a success" because there are no price constraints that I can see, people can opt out, and millions will still not be covered. Obamacare needs to turn into single payer. As long as the insurance companies are siphoning off money and making deals with hospitals and pharma, there will be no "success".
Even the pre-existing pool was under-funded, I have read.
Get the insurance companies and employers out of health care.

 

backwoodsbob

(6,001 posts)
21. you want to take peoples homes for not buying private insurance?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:07 PM
Jul 2013

wow...never thought I would see capitalism taken to that extreme here

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
29. From the start, wasn't it pretty well determined many young people wouldn't sign up
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:21 PM
Jul 2013

and would prefer to pay the fine?

Whatever it takes to tip the system into Medicare for all is what needs to happen. State-by-State.

House of Roberts

(5,175 posts)
30. Apparently you'd prefer they get treated for free at the hospital then?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:38 PM
Jul 2013

What part of 'if they need treatment' escaped you in Vietnameravet's comment? If they run up a bill and have the means to pay or assets to attach, the hospitals will go after them.

 

Vietnameravet

(1,085 posts)
31. Thanks House... I was beginning to wonder if people here can read English!
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 09:46 AM
Jul 2013

I was clearly talking about a method to get them to pay if they need treatment...or at least thought I was clear..No more free riders who suck the system dry and then expect us to come to their aid..

Response to backwoodsbob (Reply #21)

Response to backwoodsbob (Reply #21)

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
4. Gee, ya know what could solve this problem?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:27 PM
Jul 2013

Fucking single payer.

That's right, motherfucking single payer.

It could solve the problems with the businesses who don't want to insure their workers.

It could solve the problems with donut holes for prescription coverage.

It could solve the problems with the clusterfuck exchanges.

It could solve the problems with the half-assed subsidies (which subsidize *insurance companies* rather than *health care*).

Single payer now, the only option, yet it is never on the table in this so-called civilized country.

What a disgusting joke. All for corporate profits.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
5. I thought the penalty was 1%
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:27 PM
Jul 2013

of the difference in the tax threshold, which would be about $400 in this case. It also escalates to 2.5% quickly. He might forego insurance at $400/yr, but won't at $1000/yr.

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)
35. Income Tax compliance will fall precipitously as the fine increases.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 09:51 AM
Jul 2013

And they will raise the fines, and wonder why revenues keep declining.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
6. While worthy of discussion, also bear in mind that this is just the "other side of the coin" in the
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:34 PM
Jul 2013

conversation. This happens to be a story in the business section, so that's their audience. Could even be seen as a Chamber of Commerce "hit piece", depending on how far you care to muse. As was stated upthread, there are plenty of folks for whom the ACA is critical to their well-being. I am but one. Also, I always love how they pick out people making 48k and single. Those kinds of folks are a rarity these days, and becoming rarer. Recent posting here (last few days) showed the chart...wages going down, not up.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
10. and part-time too!!
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:40 PM
Jul 2013

Just to make sure they aren't eligible for employer health care. Somehow "Dan" has found TWO part time jobs that pay over 20/hr (without overtime). I'd bet "Dan" doesn't even exist.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
7. This article is complete bullshit on all levels
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:34 PM
Jul 2013

#1) A 24 year old who hasn't been to the doctor means he hasn't seen the doctor since he was 14!?!? Complete bull.
#2) A 24 year old working two part time jobs does not make $48k/year
#3) The fine is not 100/year for someone making "48k"
#4) The fine escalates dramatically over the next several years.

I'll bet that "Dan Lopez" is a "worst-case" fictional character that doesn't even exist.

tritsofme

(17,379 posts)
9. The fine for being uninsured should roughly equal the yearly cost of premiums
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:38 PM
Jul 2013

on the most inexpensive policy in the exchange, the mandate needs more teeth. Otherwise you will start to run into free rider problems like this.

leftstreet

(36,108 posts)
16. You want harsher punishment for people who don't buy insurance
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:51 PM
Jul 2013

Why are you taking the for-profit insurance side?

tritsofme

(17,379 posts)
18. If the youngest and healthiest are able to opt out of the system with little cost
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:56 PM
Jul 2013

The population left in the exchanges will be older and sicker, leading to higher premiums for all participants.

A mandate that truly encouraged participation would keep premium costs down for everyone.

leftstreet

(36,108 posts)
20. LOL there shouldn't BE any premiums
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:03 PM
Jul 2013

Look, the insurers wanted this. They can deal with the fallout

If they can't compete with the cost of a penalty, too bad!

tritsofme

(17,379 posts)
24. That is not our reality.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:11 PM
Jul 2013

The fallout will be insurers raising premiums, the only victims will be consumers trying to obtain affordable coverage and taxpayers on the hook for higher subsidies.

leftstreet

(36,108 posts)
25. "Our reality" is there are no jobs, and wages are shit
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:16 PM
Jul 2013

In the midst of a massive economic depression for the working classes the dumbass insurers FINALLY get their wish to profit off our backs. Oops, nobody's got any $!

Tough shit Big Insurers!

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
17. I guess a car accident scenario doesn't cross his mind?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 12:51 PM
Jul 2013

But, yeah, this whole thing is ridiculous. We should have Medicare for all.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
22. Don't pin this shit on the young people
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:07 PM
Jul 2013

Health Care costs are out of control.

I'm not talking about the insurance. I'm talking about the cost of the care itself.

The outrageous cost of health care has a ripple effect so strong that it is better described as a tsunami effect. It leads to everything from jobs sent abroad to the practice of working folks 39 hours a week to avoid paying for it. Perhaps the single most crippling aspect of our economy.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
36. He's a fool to not have insurance, since he really should be able to afford it.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 09:52 AM
Jul 2013

If he was making half as much, I would understand. And in fact, there are a ton of people making half as much or less, but the article doesn't address them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Health insurers fear youn...