Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has Obama said anything? in the last couple days? (Original Post) xiamiam Jul 2013 OP
Why should he? hrmjustin Jul 2013 #1
Jesus would be proud ... GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #4
that comment was uncalled for Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #7
Excuse me? That was not funny! hrmjustin Jul 2013 #8
There is lots evidence of US involvement. Tons, actually. morningfog Jul 2013 #26
If we are responsible than we should say sorry and move on. I have not seen hrmjustin Jul 2013 #27
It's a report from the FM of Austria. I haven't seen the US ambassador make a comment or morningfog Jul 2013 #28
Realistically I would not be surprised we were involved. I still would like to hear what hrmjustin Jul 2013 #31
Me thinks WovenGems Jul 2013 #39
He is the head of state, isn't he? Marrah_G Jul 2013 #30
If we are responsible then yes I would say sorry and move on. hrmjustin Jul 2013 #33
Since it is pretty clear our administration was behind the rumor Marrah_G Jul 2013 #37
Point taken! hrmjustin Jul 2013 #38
We don't know that our administration was behind the rumor Life Long Dem Jul 2013 #44
Because as President of the United States and leader of the free world, he should. Cleita Jul 2013 #35
If he is responsible then yes. hrmjustin Jul 2013 #36
no. they are smart. no need to advance nutjob from Bolivia agenda Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #2
You need to travel more. GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #6
I've traveled plenty. I'm not attacking people due to race or anything along those lines Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #10
Then perhaps READ more. chimpymustgo Jul 2013 #16
what do you suggest? Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #19
More anti-latin American xenophobia from center-right Democrats. ForgoTheConsequence Jul 2013 #32
not so sure about the "center" part. nt Union Scribe Jul 2013 #46
Like most bullies, when confronted with their action, back away Arctic Dave Jul 2013 #3
wrong answer Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #11
Absolutely the correct answer. Arctic Dave Jul 2013 #14
Hardly a fiasco Motown_Johnny Jul 2013 #5
Watch this drive. GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #9
yes. this is exactly like that time. uh...no. Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #13
Has Bolivia filed an official complaint with the US? brooklynite Jul 2013 #12
They have filed a complaint with the UN. morningfog Jul 2013 #29
...which is not the same thing. brooklynite Jul 2013 #34
There was a treaty violation. Article 54. morningfog Jul 2013 #41
Bolivia expelled the US ambassador in 2008 after the Bushistas tried to destabilize the country struggle4progress Jul 2013 #45
I would be sorely disappointed if he issued an apology for some perceived US slight. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #15
Your last sentence is one of the most likely to come true predictions treestar Jul 2013 #22
Ain't it the truth? Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #24
OP didn't specify an apology. Stmt of support would be nice leftstreet Jul 2013 #43
I wouldn't even acknowledge him, but that's just me. Suffice it to say, PBO is much nicer than I. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #47
No. He's busy making CYA statements to Europe about the NSA spying on them. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #17
i guess he hasn't from the responses thus far xiamiam Jul 2013 #18
85... Itchinjim Jul 2013 #20
No, He went golfing. treestar Jul 2013 #21
He's been cleaning off his mantel right next to the Bin Laden trophy... kentuck Jul 2013 #23
Does he ever say anything about any fiasco unless it's to apologize to forestpath Jul 2013 #25
I think he is too busy starting rumors about Morales hairdresser HipChick Jul 2013 #40
I don't know why I thought somebody would say something by now..its infuriating xiamiam Jul 2013 #42
 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
7. that comment was uncalled for
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:24 PM
Jul 2013

why can't you just coexist and assume not all DU posters believe Obama should be pilloried regarding this tin horn from Bolivia and his wild accusations.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
8. Excuse me? That was not funny!
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:25 PM
Jul 2013

There is no evidence the President has anything to do with this. Perhaps a simple written statement saying this should have never happened but that is it.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
26. There is lots evidence of US involvement. Tons, actually.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:42 PM
Jul 2013

France apologized. Spain said they were told Snowden was on board and had to "act straight away." State Dept admitted to being in contact with EU countries. It was the US ambassador who called Austria and told them Snowden was on board. Maduro was told by an EU minister that the CIA was who told them Snowden was on board.

I don't think the State Dept will be able to "no comment" this for much longer.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
27. If we are responsible than we should say sorry and move on. I have not seen
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:46 PM
Jul 2013

the bit on the ambassador. Is he admitting this or is this just a report from sources?

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
28. It's a report from the FM of Austria. I haven't seen the US ambassador make a comment or
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:47 PM
Jul 2013

be asked to.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
31. Realistically I would not be surprised we were involved. I still would like to hear what
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:50 PM
Jul 2013

the president has to say.

WovenGems

(776 posts)
39. Me thinks
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 03:08 PM
Jul 2013

The Soviets pulled one on the CIA. Made them think Snow was the plane then just let the story develop.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
30. He is the head of state, isn't he?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:49 PM
Jul 2013

And his state department caused this fiasco. At the very least I would think he would extend an apology for his administrations actions against another head of state.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
37. Since it is pretty clear our administration was behind the rumor
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:57 PM
Jul 2013

Then as President he should personally be calling Morales.

What do you think would happen if this was HIS plane that was grounded? Morales is his peer, his equal. To treat him otherwise shows arrogance and contempt towards our neighbors.

I expect our President to be a better man then Bush was and I expect him to step up when his people ( or himself) screws up.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
10. I've traveled plenty. I'm not attacking people due to race or anything along those lines
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:26 PM
Jul 2013

I'm attacking him the same way I would crazy Putin, insane Ahmadoofusjad, or any others who attack our country and president because it is in vogue.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
19. what do you suggest?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:36 PM
Jul 2013

maybe something about Spain and eventually the U.S. dominating Latin America with colonial behavior therefore it is ok to give the Bolivian president the benefit of the doubt on everything spewing from his mouth?

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
5. Hardly a fiasco
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:23 PM
Jul 2013

They will let the story develop at least through the weekend.


It already looks like all the initial reports were exaggerated (at least).


We need to see how things shake out after the Sunday talk show circuit has their say. Then (I assume) it will be addressed next week and be old news by next weekend.


The jobs numbers are bigger news.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
13. yes. this is exactly like that time. uh...no.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:27 PM
Jul 2013

for one, Bush was being a jackass when asked about a bombing in Iraq and the upsurge in violence there after the so-called mission was accomplished.

this is about a president refusing to be drawn down into the mud with the pigs over a non issue surrounding an outlaw from U.S. justice.

brooklynite

(94,572 posts)
12. Has Bolivia filed an official complaint with the US?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:26 PM
Jul 2013

call in the US Ambassador to complain?

Until then, no reply to no complaint seems appropriate.

brooklynite

(94,572 posts)
34. ...which is not the same thing.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:54 PM
Jul 2013

...and which is meaningless since there does not appear to have been any treaty violation within the UN's jurisdictoin, considering:

1) the other sovereign nations of Europe were within their rights to deny flyover

2) the plane was not "forced to land" (it chose to land because of mechanical problems)

3) Austrian authorities didn't violate Bolivia's diplomatic immunity by forcing their way onto the plane.


 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
41. There was a treaty violation. Article 54.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 03:11 PM
Jul 2013

Article 54
Obligations of third States
1.If a consular officer passes through or is in the territory of a third State, which has granted him
a visa if a visa was necessary, while proceeding to take up or return to his post or when returning to the
sending State, the third State shall accord to him all immunities provided for by the other articles of the
present Convention as may be required to ensure his transit or return. The same shall apply in the case of
any member of his family forming part of his household enjoying such privileges and immunities who
are accompanying the consular officer or travelling separately to join him or to return to the sending
State.

2.In circumstances similar to those specified in paragraph 1 of this article, third States shall not
hinder the transit through their territory of other members of the consular post or of members of their
families forming part of their households.

3.Third States shall accord to official correspondence and to other official communications in
transit, including messages in code or cipher, the same freedom and protection as the receiving State is
bound to accord under the present Convention. They shall accord to consular couriers who have been
granted a visa, if a visa was necessary, and to consular bags in transit, the same inviolability and
protection as the receiving State is bound to accord under the present Convention.

4.The obligations of third States under paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this article shall also apply to the
persons mentioned respectively in those paragraphs, and to official communications and to consular
bags, whose presence in the territory of the third State is due to force majeure.

http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_2_1963.pdf

The plane was forced to land to refuel when denied flyover of France and landing in Portugal.

struggle4progress

(118,285 posts)
45. Bolivia expelled the US ambassador in 2008 after the Bushistas tried to destabilize the country
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 05:33 PM
Jul 2013

In turn, Bush expelled Bolivia's ambassador to Washington

We have an embassy there, than Morales is threatening to close, but no ambassador

Tarheel_Dem

(31,234 posts)
15. I would be sorely disappointed if he issued an apology for some perceived US slight.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:29 PM
Jul 2013

Latin American leaders are lining up to be the next Chavez, and I hope the president doesn't play along. This shit happened in Europe. An apology from Obama would only be met with condemnation by the very folks who are urging him to make one.

xiamiam

(4,906 posts)
18. i guess he hasn't from the responses thus far
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 01:35 PM
Jul 2013

looks very bad for us in my opinion ..for those of you who think this is a non issue and have posted nonsense like why should he, I feel sorry for you. I feel sorry that you need to wait to have an opinion recognizing our culpability in this mess until the president tells you what that opinion is.

kentuck

(111,097 posts)
23. He's been cleaning off his mantel right next to the Bin Laden trophy...
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:06 PM
Jul 2013

To make room for the new Edward Snowden trophy?

 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
25. Does he ever say anything about any fiasco unless it's to apologize to
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 02:41 PM
Jul 2013

Republicans for something?

(Rhetorical question.)

xiamiam

(4,906 posts)
42. I don't know why I thought somebody would say something by now..its infuriating
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 05:13 PM
Jul 2013

what do they think? do they think we're not concerned? do they think this will just go away if nobody mentions it? baffling behavior

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has Obama said anything? ...