Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 12:15 PM Jul 2013

Lincoln’s Surveillance State

By DAVID T. Z. MINDICH

Published: July 5, 2013

COLCHESTER, Vt. — BY leaking details of the National Security Agency’s data-mining program, Edward J. Snowden revealed that the government’s surveillance efforts were far more extensive than previously understood. Many commentators have deemed the government’s activities alarming and unprecedented. The N.S.A.’s program is indeed alarming — but not, from a historical perspective, unprecedented. And history suggests that we should worry less about the surveillance itself and more about when the war in whose name the surveillance is being conducted will end.

In 1862, after President Abraham Lincoln appointed him secretary of war, Edwin M. Stanton penned a letter to the president requesting sweeping powers, which would include total control of the telegraph lines. By rerouting those lines through his office, Stanton would keep tabs on vast amounts of communication, journalistic, governmental and personal. On the back of Stanton’s letter Lincoln scribbled his approval: “The Secretary of War has my authority to exercise his discretion in the matter within mentioned.”

I came across this letter in the 1990s in the Library of Congress while researching Stanton’s wartime efforts to control the press, which included censorship, intimidation and extrajudicial arrests of reporters. On the same day he received control of the telegraphs, Stanton put an assistant secretary in charge of two areas: press relations and the newly formed secret police. Stanton ultimately had dozens of newspapermen arrested on questionable charges. Within Stanton’s first month in office, a reporter for The New York Herald, who had insisted that he be given news ahead of other reporters, was arrested as a spy.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/06/opinion/lincolns-surveillance-state.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lincoln’s Surveillance State (Original Post) FarCenter Jul 2013 OP
Was Lincoln ever wrong? kentuck Jul 2013 #1
He was pivotal in changing the US from agrarian society to a centralized, industrial, imperial state FarCenter Jul 2013 #3
In a parallel universe somewhere ... GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #2
They won and WalMart makes cars. Safetykitten Jul 2013 #4
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
3. He was pivotal in changing the US from agrarian society to a centralized, industrial, imperial state
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 12:40 PM
Jul 2013

GeorgeGist

(25,324 posts)
2. In a parallel universe somewhere ...
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 12:39 PM
Jul 2013

Lincoln allowed the South to secede. I wonder how that's working out?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lincoln’s Surveillance St...