Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Once again, Harry Reid's failure to pursue filibuster reform bites Democrats in the ass . . . (Original Post) markpkessinger Jul 2013 OP
Bullshit. Read your own articles. babylonsister Jul 2013 #1
From the article .. . markpkessinger Jul 2013 #2
since Obama's crowd will reap a profit of $51 Billion in loan profits... msongs Jul 2013 #3
Obama's crowd? What does that mean? nt babylonsister Jul 2013 #4
It means they should have fought this, but didn't. RC Jul 2013 #5

babylonsister

(171,072 posts)
1. Bullshit. Read your own articles.
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:13 PM
Jul 2013
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/10/student-loan-vote_n_3573451.html?utm_hp_ref=politics


The disagreement between the various parties hinges somewhat on whether student loan interest rates should be fixed to the government's cost to borrow for 10 years or a much shorter duration. Short-term Treasuries carry lower rates than longer-term debt.

The White House had initially offered tepid support for the one-year option, according to people involved in the deliberations. The administration has been working with the group of lawmakers led by Manchin and King to negotiate a compromise that could generate enough support from student groups, consumer advocates and Democratic lawmakers to pass into law.

In the meantime, 7 million students this coming school year are set to pay more, even though there is widespread support for preventing that very outcome. It’s unclear whether the sides ultimately will reach an accord.

"This should have been resolved much earlier," said Michael Dannenberg, Education Trust higher education director and a former Obama education official.

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
2. From the article .. .
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:16 PM
Jul 2013
. . . The proposal on Wednesday was supported by 51 senators and opposed by 49, needing at least 60 votes in order to advance to a final vote. . . .


Perhaps you should take your own advice and read more carefully.

msongs

(67,420 posts)
3. since Obama's crowd will reap a profit of $51 Billion in loan profits...
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:18 PM
Jul 2013

dems will be complicit thus losing an excellent weapon to use against repubs.

according to the article:

"The legislative jockeying comes amid a government forecast that the Obama administration will reap a $51 billion profit this fiscal year from the federal student loan program, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Nearly all new loans for higher education are provided by the federal government. The profit, generated thanks to near-record spreads between the government's cost to borrow and what students pay in interest, has contributed to the cumulative $1.2 trillion in educational debt carried by U.S. households."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Once again, Harry Reid's ...