Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:02 AM Jul 2013

Former Senator Mike Gravel believes Obama should be tried for murder.

Despite his disappointment in senators who oppose the NSA programs, Gravel's disdain for President Barack Obama is even more apparent.

Obama, he says, is "a total fraud" and should be put on trial for murder by the International Court of Justice, a branch of the United Nations commonly known as the World Court. Gravel is confident that Obama would be found guilty.

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2013/07/09/former-sen-gravel-nsa-leaks-should-have-come-from-senators

I said he has turned into a kook, and was accused of attacking the messenger.

If only I had known this before voting in November.

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former Senator Mike Gravel believes Obama should be tried for murder. (Original Post) ProSense Jul 2013 OP
If you haven't gotten any attention lately..... Californeeway Jul 2013 #1
Hence Sarah Palin's entire existence. JaneyVee Jul 2013 #2
While I disagree with Mike Gravel on this I do think the drone strikes are deplorable think Jul 2013 #3
I try to see it from a practical perspective: The Straight Story Jul 2013 #4
Of course not! Hydra Jul 2013 #7
That is essentially the same defense Zimmerman is using, he was just being practical. 1-Old-Man Jul 2013 #24
When presidents do it cpwm17 Jul 2013 #5
When in doubt... avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #9
Great video cpwm17 Jul 2013 #10
i think mike has reached that age of cranky old man... madrchsod Jul 2013 #6
"He's a traitor, lets hang him!" AZ Progressive Jul 2013 #8
BS magellan Jul 2013 #11
Prosense didn't tell you that Gravel called Bush a murderer Blue Bike Jul 2013 #14
I don't see any reason for Obama to be sent to The Hague. magellan Jul 2013 #15
You typed "Bush first" Blue Bike Jul 2013 #17
I say that to anyone who wants to prosecute Obama. n/t magellan Jul 2013 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author magellan Jul 2013 #18
Bingo! Life Long Dem Jul 2013 #12
So you are saying it is not true? redgreenandblue Jul 2013 #13
Well there may be a fraud here. Savannahmann Jul 2013 #16
+ + + byeya Jul 2013 #20
But... but... RudynJack Jul 2013 #21
Thank you for exposing the OP's attempt to mislead us. Karmadillo Jul 2013 #22
I think you're wrong. The next line doesn't say Obama is innocent, quite the contrary. 1-Old-Man Jul 2013 #23
A pattern of low integrity AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #27
Pathetic attempt to mischaracterize Dreamer Tatum Jul 2013 #25
Prosense, what percent of your 1000-word paeans contain similar selective edits? Dreamer Tatum Jul 2013 #26
Interesting. You conveniently left out the part where he said Bush and Obama should be prosecuted. Apophis Jul 2013 #28
You should have linked to your links, to your links, to your links instead AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #29
Mike Gravel ran for president in 2007-08. He was borderline then. Zen Democrat Jul 2013 #30
 

think

(11,641 posts)
3. While I disagree with Mike Gravel on this I do think the drone strikes are deplorable
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:09 AM
Jul 2013

Killing innocent women and children in countries that aren't at war with us is a stain on America.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
4. I try to see it from a practical perspective:
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:12 AM
Jul 2013

Iran goes to war with Mexico and uses drones in the US that kills innocent adults and children. They claim they were after terrorists coming over the border.

Would one say that their leader should be put on trial?

Would they (we) be a kook to say so?

One can get what you are saying, but sometimes we become too Ameri-centric in our views and don't look at the world from outside our own bubble (which is one thing that has aided in causing us problems).


Pakistan Summons U.S. Envoy Over Drone Strike
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/08/pakistan-us-envoy-summoned_n_3407803.html

Yemeni Government Covers Up U.S. Responsibility for Civilian Drone Deaths
Following a 2009 U.S. drone strike on the southern region of al-Majala, which resulted in the deaths of dozens of civilians, Yemen’s then-leader Ali Abdullah Saleh told then-U.S. Central Command chief Gen. David H. Petraeus, “We’ll continue saying the bombs are ours, not yours.” The assurance was made in a U.S. Embassy email, which was later disclosed by WikiLeaks.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022095489

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
7. Of course not!
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 01:51 AM
Jul 2013

We certainly wouldn't be in Iran the very next day planting our flag in Tehran. We'd spend 3 weeks bombing every square inch of the place first!

Seriously, you hit the nail on the head. If it wasn't for american exceptionalism, we'd never be able to plausibly float how killing random people with remote controlled aircraft is somehow justified and legal.

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
5. When presidents do it
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:14 AM
Jul 2013

those brown people over there aren't really people and murder isn't murder. Former Senator Mike Gravel should know that.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
6. i think mike has reached that age of cranky old man...
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:28 AM
Jul 2013

there really is something sad when someone like gravel says things like this.

 

Blue Bike

(65 posts)
14. Prosense didn't tell you that Gravel called Bush a murderer
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 09:11 AM
Jul 2013

If he had told you that, you wouldn't have asked Gravel to say something he already said. From the article:

""Let the World Court prosecute Obama and Bush for the crimes and murders they've committed," he said. "When you take the whole program of the drones, it's unconscionable the number of people killed innocently."

magellan

(13,257 posts)
15. I don't see any reason for Obama to be sent to The Hague.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 09:15 AM
Jul 2013

Bush** should have been prosecuted here, THEN sent to The Hague.

So I disagree with Mikey.

Response to Blue Bike (Reply #17)

redgreenandblue

(2,088 posts)
13. So you are saying it is not true?
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 08:06 AM
Jul 2013

Or what is your point?

Yes, if Obama was leading a third world country rather than the USA, his actions in office would be sufficient to convict him.

Same goes for previous US presidents.


 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
16. Well there may be a fraud here.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 09:19 AM
Jul 2013

The next line in the story is far more telling. Your decision to snip it is as usual, part and parcel of your pattern. Hell, We expect that kind of thing from Rush Limbaugh, not a Democrat.

The very next line in the news story is the actual quote from Former Senator Gravel....... (drumroll)

"Let the World Court prosecute Obama and Bush for the crimes and murders they've committed," he said. "When you take the whole program of the drones, it's unconscionable the number of people killed innocently."


Don't you ever get tired of carrying the water away from the fire?

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
23. I think you're wrong. The next line doesn't say Obama is innocent, quite the contrary.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 11:24 AM
Jul 2013

What is says is that both Obama and Bush are guilty, and I daresay a few other Presidents too.

If President Obama ordered the targeting of any American anywhere in the world without the target having had the benefit of trial, by jury, by his or her peers, with the assistance of counsel, and that person was subsequently killed as a result of his order then he, President Obama, is indeed and in fact a murderer. Either that or the US Constitution has no meaning what so ever. Which is it?

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
27. A pattern of low integrity
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 11:49 AM
Jul 2013

When dishonesty is repeatedly used to "defend" something, it exposes that something as indefensible. I do not believe that Obama would approve of such sleaze in his "defense".

It makes Obama look worse, not better.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
25. Pathetic attempt to mischaracterize
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 11:41 AM
Jul 2013

You should clarify what he actually said or delete. Or maybe ask your handlers if they meant to do this , since I'm guessing the only keys on your computer are Ctrl, C, V, and Enter.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
26. Prosense, what percent of your 1000-word paeans contain similar selective edits?
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 11:47 AM
Jul 2013

I think you've damaged your credibility rather badly here.

 

Apophis

(1,407 posts)
28. Interesting. You conveniently left out the part where he said Bush and Obama should be prosecuted.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 11:54 AM
Jul 2013

You're agenda is showing.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
29. You should have linked to your links, to your links, to your links instead
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 11:58 AM
Jul 2013

...of linking to the actual story. Posting just the actual story wrecked your usual level of obfuscation and exposed your complete lack of integrity in this particular case.

The never ending pattern of obfuscation in Obama's "defense" only serves to make Obama look worse, not better.

Zen Democrat

(5,901 posts)
30. Mike Gravel ran for president in 2007-08. He was borderline then.
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:21 PM
Jul 2013

But, he was fantastic when he was in the Senate lo those many years ago when he read the Pentagon Papers into the official record.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former Senator Mike Grave...