Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy I oppose Senator Warren's "21st Century Glass-Seagall Act"
The mistake is not in introducing bank reform; it's naming it "Glass-Steagall". Ask 100 people on the street if they know what Glass-Steagall refers to and maybe five will know it has to do with banks: if you're lucky, one will be able to describe any of its features.
Remember Vice President Gore thinking he had a great attack line by challenging George W Bush to support "Dingell-Norwood"? Any idea what it was for? Neither did anyone watching the debate. (answer: a "Patient's Bill or Rights" .
"Glass-Steagall", "Dingell-Norwood", "Kemp-Roth" etc. are inside the Beltway terms that have no resonance whatsoever with the average voter. If we want to generate support for legislation it has to be well-crafted AND well-labeled. Simple names ("The Fair Banking Act"?) can lead to an understanding of a Bill's goals and help generate support with thepublic,
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 1244 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why I oppose Senator Warren's "21st Century Glass-Seagall Act" (Original Post)
brooklynite
Jul 2013
OP
per GOP template, this would be the "Helping Banks Fuck Over Americans Act"
Pretzel_Warrior
Jul 2013
#12
So you want to dump it because it needs a new title? Good thing you are not in showbiz.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#4
I refuse to bankroll this SciFi adventure. The name Blue Harvest SUCKS!!!
Pretzel_Warrior
Jul 2013
#13
polichick
(37,152 posts)1. Republicans are better at using descriptive phrases...
I agree, it could help here.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)7. In a cynical Orwellian context.
Bill names, like the American Prosperity Act, that actually raises taxes on the bottom 95% while reducing taxes on the top 5%....that type of thing.
polichick
(37,152 posts)8. Yep, they're evil but good at what they're trying to do.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)12. per GOP template, this would be the "Helping Banks Fuck Over Americans Act"
polichick
(37,152 posts)14. Now we're talking!
cali
(114,904 posts)2. so you oppose the entire bill based on the name?
because that's what you said.
think
(11,641 posts)3. Perhap's stating you oppose the name would be more accurate
Although you did well in getting my attention
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)4. So you want to dump it because it needs a new title? Good thing you are not in showbiz.
If your issue is with the name itself, you should say that.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)13. I refuse to bankroll this SciFi adventure. The name Blue Harvest SUCKS!!!
think
(11,641 posts)5. Don't Let Banks Screw US Act might be more relevant
Although I'm down with almost any name as long as the legislation passes....
think
(11,641 posts)6. Banksters Behave Act?
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)9. How about...
Elizabeth Warren Bitchslaps the Bankers Act?
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)10. You oppose it because of it's name?
That's not a legitimate reason.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)11. it kinda is
think about it if Graham-Leach-Bliley had been named the "when Bill Clinton signs this you are going to be fucked" act. might have gotten the attention it deserved.
perception, in all things, is everything. you know this!