Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Catholic Bishop says to keep weddings in church (Original Post) JohnnyLib2 Feb 2012 OP
*shrug* Orangepeel Feb 2012 #1
What he thinks is irrelevant. IMHO anyway. CaliforniaPeggy Feb 2012 #2
Yeah, the Catholic Church making pronouncements on moral issues MH1 Feb 2012 #21
It's relevant to Catholics who want a priest to officiate at their wedding. pnwmom Feb 2012 #36
Good grief Irishonly Feb 2012 #3
Is it so unreasonable for Catholic priests to say they will only conduct pnwmom Feb 2012 #12
The way you put it does not sound unreasonable BuroshKozorg Feb 2012 #16
It's church law, but I don't see why any non-Catholic would care. pnwmom Feb 2012 #37
Here's more from the same bishop (Louisville): JohnnyLib2 Feb 2012 #4
Hey Bishop, Please Keep Your Entire Religion In There jberryhill Feb 2012 #5
"Amen" to that! beac Feb 2012 #26
I think it is just so they can keep an eye on the alter boys Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #6
I expect more of this stuff going forward. Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #7
They are getting more conservative, but THIS rule is nothing new at all. pnwmom Feb 2012 #14
I have Irishonly Feb 2012 #20
I got married in that decade and it wasn't an option for us. pnwmom Feb 2012 #35
I see it differently than you do Irishonly Feb 2012 #42
You're wrong about what I think. I think it's fine if a couple wants an outdoor ceremony. pnwmom Feb 2012 #43
Everyone has opinions n/t Irishonly Feb 2012 #44
The one weird Catholic wedding rule I never understood TlalocW Feb 2012 #8
Catholic weddings are religious ceremonies, pnwmom Feb 2012 #10
Well, the specific naming of that song is what threw me TlalocW Feb 2012 #13
That is strange, unless they just used that as an example. pnwmom Feb 2012 #38
I've been to Catholic weddings in the past where secular music "flew." MADem Feb 2012 #18
I think they were probably looser with the rules in the 70's. pnwmom Feb 2012 #39
I think the crackdown is even more recent. MADem Feb 2012 #45
We anticipated difficulties because my son-in-law wasn't Christian, pnwmom Feb 2012 #46
What good luck! MADem Feb 2012 #48
No. We were asked to pay the church coordinator $250, pnwmom Feb 2012 #49
Wow, that's a deal! nt MADem Feb 2012 #50
This is nothing new. Most people who want a church wedding want a church wedding. pnwmom Feb 2012 #9
Even some of the popes didn't get married in churches. Julius III, for instance. n/t dimbear Feb 2012 #11
And he would know so much about weddings because ... Zoeisright Feb 2012 #15
And their priest may be surprised when the happy couple says PISS OFF, Padre! MADem Feb 2012 #17
+1 Sherman A1 Feb 2012 #19
What is interesting in this whole debate tinymontgomery Feb 2012 #22
excellent point fascisthunter Feb 2012 #24
Pssssst... you are Losing CONTROL!!!! What shall you ever doooooo????? fascisthunter Feb 2012 #23
Oooh, I know!!! Arugula Latte Feb 2012 #31
I know a few people who got married twice marlakay Feb 2012 #25
This has been SOP for weddings for a long time CatholicEdHead Feb 2012 #27
I don't see what they big deal is... hughee99 Feb 2012 #28
this was pretty muc standard policy in 1991 when we got married. mulsh Feb 2012 #29
Your desperate grasp on the sheep is slipping, Bishop. Arugula Latte Feb 2012 #30
Must have rewrote the Bible.... whistler162 Feb 2012 #32
LOL JohnnyLib2 Feb 2012 #33
Suits me. I'm a professional officiant HillWilliam Feb 2012 #34
There's a growing number of priests who have left the fold who will cheerfully do "Catholic-ish" MADem Feb 2012 #47
I believe that in the Middle Ages LiberalEsto Feb 2012 #40
If ya kept the whole goddam thing in there... Iggo Feb 2012 #41

MH1

(17,600 posts)
21. Yeah, the Catholic Church making pronouncements on moral issues
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:41 AM
Feb 2012

fits somewhere alongside a convicted thief talking about respecting other people's property.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
36. It's relevant to Catholics who want a priest to officiate at their wedding.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 06:56 PM
Feb 2012

And this isn't news to most Catholics -- it's always been Church practice, because a Catholic wedding is a religious ceremony.

I don't know why a non-Catholic would care.

Irishonly

(3,344 posts)
3. Good grief
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:47 PM
Feb 2012

Just when you think it has gotten as insane as it is going to get, you find out you were wrong. They want to control a woman's right to choose, her uterus and a lot more that I can think of right now. Next, they will be demanding approval for how one dresses.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
12. Is it so unreasonable for Catholic priests to say they will only conduct
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 02:49 AM
Feb 2012

Catholic religious ceremonies in Catholic churches?

This is nothing new.

 

BuroshKozorg

(21 posts)
16. The way you put it does not sound unreasonable
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:15 AM
Feb 2012

As far as I know a formal Catholic Wedding Mass includes the Eucharist, which may be a bit inconvenient in the outdoors.

I don't know anything about Canon Law, not being Catholic, but is this a blanket decision, or is it a decision that is up to the priests themselves? If it's up to the individual priests, then I don't even see what the big deal is.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
37. It's church law, but I don't see why any non-Catholic would care.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 07:03 PM
Feb 2012

If a Catholic wants a church wedding, then it takes place in a Church with a priest. But no one's forcing Catholics to do that, and more and more don't.

My daughter was married in our Catholic Church, and I was impressed with how positive the experience was -- and how welcoming they were to her husband, who wasn't Catholic or any other Christian denomination. There was no pressure put on either one of them.

However, there was the understanding that the ceremony would be taking place in the Church. That made sense to both my daughter and her husband, since it would be a Catholic ceremony.

JohnnyLib2

(11,212 posts)
4. Here's more from the same bishop (Louisville):
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:52 PM
Feb 2012

"Louisville Roman Catholic Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz and Southern Baptist Theological Seminary President Albert Mohler signed a letter decrying the revised federal mandate for free contraceptives for employees at many faith-based agencies. Opponents view it as an infringement on religious freedom.

Kurtz and Mohler — who increasingly find themselves allied in culture-war disputes such as their opposition to same-sex marriage — signed the letter dated Monday by a coalition of religious leaders."

http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20120216/NEWS01/302160053/Louisville-religious-leaders-Obama-contraceptive?odyssey=nav|head

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
5. Hey Bishop, Please Keep Your Entire Religion In There
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:01 AM
Feb 2012

I agree wholeheartedly with this Bishop. Keep your religion in your churches. Don't bring it out into public parks, town squares, and by all means don't let it anywhere near the legislature.

Do we have a deal?

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
7. I expect more of this stuff going forward.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:15 AM
Feb 2012

It's the Republicanisation of the Church. They've recaptured the Bishop-class and their views are reflected by people like Bill O'Donohue. They want their pre-liberalised Church back. The world has changed, but they've stayed faithful to the doctrinaire rigidity of pre-Vatican Council ii. They are social conservatives with a vengeance. They want their social order back, the secrecy and the community power back. But, like their counterparts in politics, they may win their battle...but they cannot win the war. The rewards for their demands to return to a traditional society ordered in pre-1960 values will be fewer attendees at Mass and a lot more practicing lapsed Catholics. Have at it, guys.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
14. They are getting more conservative, but THIS rule is nothing new at all.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 02:51 AM
Feb 2012

I've never attended a Catholic wedding outside of a Church. It's a religious ceremony, so they hold it in a Church.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
35. I got married in that decade and it wasn't an option for us.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 06:52 PM
Feb 2012

If a Catholic priest really did officiate at that ceremony, it was his personal decision -- not in accordance with Church practice.

But I still don't see why anyone would think it's a big deal that a Catholic Church would want to hold its religious ceremonies inside its place of worship.

Irishonly

(3,344 posts)
42. I see it differently than you do
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 08:44 PM
Feb 2012

If a couple chooses to be married in a church that it great. If they want a ceremony when dawn breaks and if their guests are willing to get up that early that is great also. I am not Catholic, was married in a church but I do not understand why a church needs to issue rulings as to where someone can get married. They most certainly can and did but to someone who has never attended a church like that does that it seems strange. There are a lot more important things to worry about, IMO and that's what it is my opinion.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
43. You're wrong about what I think. I think it's fine if a couple wants an outdoor ceremony.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 09:13 PM
Feb 2012

However, I also think it's fine if a priest says he only performs religious wedding ceremonies in the church.

I agree there are a lot more important things to worry about, so I can't understand why a non-Catholic would care about this at all.

TlalocW

(15,382 posts)
8. The one weird Catholic wedding rule I never understood
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:34 AM
Feb 2012

No playing/singing of Jim Croce's, "Time in a Bottle."

TlalocW

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
10. Catholic weddings are religious ceremonies,
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 02:48 AM
Feb 2012

usually a part of a Mass.

They don't play secular music in a Catholic religious ceremony.

Is that really so weird to you?

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
38. That is strange, unless they just used that as an example.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 07:07 PM
Feb 2012

The general rule is they only play Sacred music in the sanctuary, not pop music.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
18. I've been to Catholic weddings in the past where secular music "flew."
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 04:01 AM
Feb 2012

It was popular love songs--crap like the Carpenters or Ann Murray put out-- definitely not religious. They did Ave Maria during the communion, but secular tunes up and down the aisle.

This guy would probably crack down on that stuff.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
39. I think they were probably looser with the rules in the 70's.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 07:09 PM
Feb 2012

There are a lot of hardline bishops these days.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
45. I think the crackdown is even more recent.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 01:39 AM
Feb 2012

Everything started to loosen up in the later sixties, and even up to the nineties I enjoyed a pre-recorded version of Etta James' 'At Last' when the happy couple came back down the aisle. It was somewhat of a reward for sitting through a full blown mass in a drafty church.

I am racking my brain trying to remember if I've been to a Roman Catholic wedding in the last decade or so....I'm not coming up with any, so they either were unremarkable, or the children/grandchildren of my Catholic friends have all fallen away from the fold!

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
46. We anticipated difficulties because my son-in-law wasn't Christian,
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:44 AM
Feb 2012

much less Catholic -- but there weren't any.

At the end of their junior year, they went to talk to the priest at their college, asking whether this was going to pose a problem -- and he said definitely not, from his point of view. And he said if her pastor here wouldn't marry them (after graduation), then he would be happy to.

Then her pastor here was delighted to marry them, so that's what they did. I did get the feeling that fewer young people are making the choice these days, so both of these priests were happy to perform the ceremony -- even if the groom wasn't Christian. And the pastor here not only didn't pressure him to convert -- he said that this wouldn't be the appropriate time to convert. It should be something my son-in-law did because he wanted to, not in order to marry.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
48. What good luck!
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 03:04 AM
Feb 2012

Of course, college priests used to be "cooler" than the average cleric, but to hit two priests who didn't throw up obstacles is really a lucky break.

Did your daughter's pastor hit the happy couple up for five thousand bucks worth of "Catholic wedding planning?" I have a feeling that some of these expenditures are going into the "Cardinal Above-The Law Payoff Fund" -- at least in New England.

If I'd only heard of these unbelievable demands for money from one couple, it would be one thing--but I've heard it at least three times. It's a mind-blower!

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
49. No. We were asked to pay the church coordinator $250,
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 03:14 AM
Feb 2012

but that was a drop in the bucket of wedding costs.

If we hadn't been able to afford it, they wouldn't have pushed for that. But they knew how many people we were having, and where the reception was occurring, so it was obvious we could afford that amount.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
9. This is nothing new. Most people who want a church wedding want a church wedding.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 02:46 AM
Feb 2012

Not a beach wedding or a country club wedding.

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)
15. And he would know so much about weddings because ...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:07 AM
Feb 2012

he's a never-been-married "celibate" male? Who knows nothing about women? Or love?

STFU, you old man.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
17. And their priest may be surprised when the happy couple says PISS OFF, Padre!
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:56 AM
Feb 2012

I recently attended a wedding of two lovely kids, both raised Catholic, who were married by one of their best friends, who got one of those "license for a day" deals. It was a great ceremony, very personal, and the friend-officiant put a lot of thought into the whole thing. He did a very good job--made the day very memorable.

They apparently didn't want pay a five thousand dollar fee for "premarital counseling" and "Catholic wedding planning" and rental of the church. That didn't include the reception, FWIW, but if they wanted to have an alcohol-free shindig in the church hall (they would have to pay a hefty rental for that crappy place), the "priest wedding planner" could have put them in touch with caterers who give a kickback to the church for additional fees.

I can't say as I blamed them. The parents of both bride and groom thought the priest was attempting to commit highway robbery as well. They were ready to get married in the church, but they thought a five grand "fee" for bullshit was a stickup. Instead, they got married at the reception venue; the staff set up chairs and a little arch with flowers, and after the ceremony, everyone went and had a few pops at the bar while they reconfigured the room for a meal. It all went very smoothly--fun day.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
19. +1
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 05:22 AM
Feb 2012

Good for them! The Catholic Church (and all of them in my opinion) are nothing more than another business. If they fail to meet the needs of their customers, then their customers can take their business down the street.

tinymontgomery

(2,584 posts)
22. What is interesting in this whole debate
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:50 PM
Feb 2012

is that the conservatives were concerned that JFK would listen to the pope if elected. Now who is listening to the catholic church.

 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
23. Pssssst... you are Losing CONTROL!!!! What shall you ever doooooo?????
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:51 PM
Feb 2012

How about be a part of the human race and stop trying to be GOD of it all!

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
31. Oooh, I know!!!
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:49 PM
Feb 2012

*raises hand enthusiastically*

Become even more ridiculously pompous and moralistic and increase the velocity by which they shove dogma down peoples' throats?!

marlakay

(11,468 posts)
25. I know a few people who got married twice
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:54 PM
Feb 2012

Just because one had to be in catholic church to be considered really married by their faith...I had no idea the church charged that much..what do their poorer members do??

CatholicEdHead

(9,740 posts)
27. This has been SOP for weddings for a long time
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:18 PM
Feb 2012

in that in the Theology, it can only be done in the blessed sanctuary. Many more modern priests have done them outside the Church walls, but they are becoming fewer and fewer. I am fine with Catholic Weddings to be held outside the brick and mortar Church walls.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
28. I don't see what they big deal is...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:28 PM
Feb 2012

if you want a catholic priest to perform the wedding, they want you to do it in a catholic church.

My wife and I are both Catholic. When we got married she wanted to have her priest marry us, but when she found out that not only did we have to do it in her church, but also they couldn't get us anywhere near the date or time she wanted, she told them never mind. We got married at a very nice place by a JP.

mulsh

(2,959 posts)
29. this was pretty muc standard policy in 1991 when we got married.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 01:46 PM
Feb 2012

my Presbyterian in laws insisted my wife and I have a "Catholic" ceremony.( I know, duh?). My wife & I were sort of ambibuous, my parents a little less so, they were relieved I "found someone". anyway my parent's parish would not perform and out doors ceremony. Fortunately the Monsignor recommended a friend who is a bishop in the Orthodox Roman Catholic Church. They adhere to pre-Vatican I church beliefs and they're recognized by Rome.

We had our ceremony in the faculty club grove on CAL's campus. even my mom's hard core Catholic friends were impressed.

 

whistler162

(11,155 posts)
32. Must have rewrote the Bible....
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 03:04 PM
Feb 2012

Was -

"Matthew 18:20
New International Version (NIV)

20 For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them.”

Now -

"Matthew 18:20
New International Version (NIV)

20 For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them as long as it is in a building.”

HillWilliam

(3,310 posts)
34. Suits me. I'm a professional officiant
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 05:23 PM
Feb 2012

The more these screecher-preacher types turn couples away, the more business for me.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
47. There's a growing number of priests who have left the fold who will cheerfully do "Catholic-ish"
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:47 AM
Feb 2012

ceremonies for couples who want to please some farty older relatives. I guess they charge a bit more, but if you don't want Auntie SoAndSo or Uncle SuchAndSuch to have too much of a cow, it's worth the change--and certainly cheaper than having to jump through the hoops (with associated expenses) the actual church demands.

 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
40. I believe that in the Middle Ages
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 07:13 PM
Feb 2012

most marriage vows were exchanged outside the church.

Amazing how they switch back and forth on various things.

Iggo

(47,552 posts)
41. If ya kept the whole goddam thing in there...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 07:14 PM
Feb 2012

...I'd back you a thousand percent, Bishop old boy!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Catholic Bishop says to k...