Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If somebody had told you a year ago that Rick Santorum... (Original Post) book_worm Feb 2012 OP
No. ewagner Feb 2012 #1
Yes because BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #2
I always think Abramoff when I think of Santorum Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2012 #3
It's a sign of a desperate political party B Calm Feb 2012 #4
I had a suspicion after his name was given it's "special" definition. Kurmudgeon Feb 2012 #5
You've been suspecting since 2003? Morning Dew Feb 2012 #10
Agreed. 2labslib Feb 2012 #11
Fine, let's propose this as official policy... 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #15
Ron Paul still needs his turn drving the clown car liberal N proud Feb 2012 #6
The libertarian wing of the GOP B Calm Feb 2012 #12
Please scroll down for reply: Surya Gayatri Feb 2012 #7
Never in a million years. Lugnut Feb 2012 #8
Yes. treestar Feb 2012 #9
I wouldn't have believed it in December n/t RZM Feb 2012 #13
No. MoonRiver Feb 2012 #14

ewagner

(18,964 posts)
1. No.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:11 AM
Feb 2012

With his record of lobbyist involvement and bizarre ideas on abortion and sex I thought he was relegated to the dust-bin of history.

BumRushDaShow

(129,064 posts)
2. Yes because
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:14 AM
Feb 2012

first it was batshit crazy BachKKKmann.
Then it was Ric "Parry".
Then it was "9-9-9 Cain".
Then it was "Blowhard Getrich".

So now it is Frothy's turn.

The question is whether about half-way through this, the media finally gets around to briefly anointing Ron Paul.

Lost in all this is the parallel universe of Rmoney as the presumptive nominee.

 

Kurmudgeon

(1,751 posts)
5. I had a suspicion after his name was given it's "special" definition.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:48 AM
Feb 2012

It goes to show that pointing out one right wing candidate that liberals, gays, etc, etc, hate and giving them a special nickname, just may make the right wingers rally around him.
When it became obvious to the cons that Romney might win this, Gingrich, Paul, etc, etc would never win, what were they left with?
If only he had been ignored instead. I hope Santorum goes away after this election cycle, but I wouldn't count on it.
The whole deal allows his supporters to play the victim card and it's best never to give these jokers anything they can use.
Also, "no such thing as bad publicity"....

2labslib

(48 posts)
11. Agreed.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 02:02 PM
Feb 2012

I think the new definition of his name plus the backing of the Christian Powers That Be has given him a big boost.

2ndAmForComputers

(3,527 posts)
15. Fine, let's propose this as official policy...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 06:00 PM
Feb 2012

...in the next Worldwide Summit of Dirty Leftists, Pro-Deathers, Atheists, and Assorted Enemies of Christendom.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
12. The libertarian wing of the GOP
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 05:47 PM
Feb 2012

is only around 20%. I don't see Ron Paul ever getting his turn. I think he should run on the libertarian ticket and really do some damage to the GOP.

Lugnut

(9,791 posts)
8. Never in a million years.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:25 PM
Feb 2012

After the residency fraud in PA I thought his political career was over. If he ends up being the nominee I'm wondering if all the PA things will be rehashed.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
9. Yes.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:26 PM
Feb 2012

There is no limit with the insanity of Republicans. If you said they might run Rove as their candidate, I would consider it possible.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If somebody had told you ...