General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsa thought brought on by an earlier thread--WHY isn't big pharma telling these anti-choice cretins
to just shut up? after all, if these woman-hating cretins get their way and make contraception illegal, isn't that going to cut into big pharma's profits? you would think they would be a bit p'o'ed about this.
snot
(10,529 posts)Pregnancy is much more hazardous to women's health than contraception and so much more profitable.
I'm not saying I'm certain that this is their calculation, just that if profits are the criterion, they make more from more pregnancies and a bigger population.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)with a Republican in office who won't force them into competitive pricing.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)to have it take effect. How else could they maintain their "persecuted" status?
It is just like Abortion. If they were so opposed to it they would FAVOR birth control and make
the dreaded abortion unnecessary. Reality and rationality never inflict themselves
on the reactionary radicals.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)a loss in the sales of those pills.
they notice when something like Lipitor goes off patent.
tanyev
(42,564 posts)That's one thing that would save them tons of money. Small business, too. If people didn't have to try and get health insurance from an employer, an employer that was too small to offer it would be just as desirable as a large employer.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)but not salaries.
tanyev
(42,564 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Health insurance is a major tool that big business uses to hold down competition from small businesses. The big guys can negotiate low rates with their large employee pools, while the small guys get stiffed with whatever the insurance companies want to charge them.
4whomthebelletrolls
(11 posts)although I don't stay up at night about abortions. I just don't like the easy-breezy-Covergirl coloring of the issue as no biggie.
Oh, and I forgot to add that I am insulted by your depiction of a person like me as a cretin.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)as "easy-breezy-Covergirl coloring of the issue as no biggie."
Oh, and let me add that I am a woman and pro-choice, and I find that characterization insulting.
4whomthebelletrolls
(11 posts)I know someone who had seven abortions. WTF, man?
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Would you force her to carry each and every pregnancy to term and become a mother against her will? What will you do to stop her from finding an abortion, even if you make it illegal? Have the law forceably "detain" her against her will?
As the saying goes, "If you can't trust me with a choice, how can you trust me with a child?"
kdmorris
(5,649 posts)she would have had MORE choices...
Abortion is not a choice that women make lightly, you know.
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)Uh-huh. Right.
niyad
(113,325 posts)the name was a dead giveaway, as was the "I knew a woman who had seven abortions"
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)to raise a little hell with her/him/it.
niyad
(113,325 posts)I need to sharpen my claws every once in a while. . .
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I just saw some of it's other stuff here. Pretty awful and demented. Sucks to be him/her/it.
niyad
(113,325 posts)Iris
(15,659 posts)That was the most gratifying part of watching a troll go down!
niyad
(113,325 posts)privileges revoked"
physioex
(6,890 posts)But that is my personal life. And as a proud Planned Parenthood supporter I will defend any woman's right to choose.
niyad
(113,325 posts)is clearly too stupid to do it for herself.
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)If you are, then you probably fit the description in the OP exactly.
Welcome to DU. Enjoy your stay.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)was from a guy who actually claimed that the Catholic church is not opposed to medication that contains the same drugs as birth control pills and not used for contraception, but to treat other conditions.
Hello?! It's called the birth control pill. Do people believe pharma packages these pills differently and gives them a new name when they are prescribed for endometriosos, etc? LOL
JVS
(61,935 posts)the pharma companies would rather deal with isolated consumers than with insurance companies who carry enough clout to negotiate lower prices.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)(mostly Evangelical but sharing more than some questions of law with mainline prelates), 3. libertarians, 4. militarists
it's caused quite a boil, especially around #1
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)A non-issue for them, I mean to say. The pill is not going anywhere, you know it, I know it, and they know it. They see no reason to wade into this shitstorm and get dirty. Thats why I think they are silent in the issue.
Iris
(15,659 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)that this won't bother them much at all. Might help them determine where to spend their money on what politician in the future. Money has neither cares nor a conscience