General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy can you predict someone's support for Zimmerman by their stance on gun control?
This is almost a perfect correlation.
Why?
Skittles
(153,185 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)And I quit the rkba group because of that.
premium
(3,731 posts)but I've always said that I believed that Zimmerman was guilty of Manslaughter, so how does that square with your thread?
JI7
(89,262 posts)Just Saying
(1,799 posts)If he's the example of a responsible gun owner then we need much stricter gun laws.
I think at least some of them don't want anyone questioning who they choose to shoot. Sick ain't it?
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Can you supply data for that observation? And was the calculation accomplished with biserial methods, a Pearsonian coefficient, or something like Spearman's Rho?
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)he paints with it.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Do you have a license for those impressive statistical tools?
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)(Concealed Carry of a Statistics Package for the Social Sciences)
Response to CreekDog (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JI7
(89,262 posts)how he didn't go to the hospital after the shooting and ended up going to some regular doctor he already knew from before .
it's all BS.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Considering that he is the world's foremost forensic pathologist, I will go with what he says.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)You mean the paid "expert" who charges $400 an hour? No shit!!
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Experts witnesses in trials, whether testifying for the prosecution or defense are paid, unless they are on staff, such as Dr. Bao. That he charges does not mean that he lies. Obviously you don't like what he says. Creationists didn't like what Dr. Gould said about evolution either. Forensic pathology has no politics, it is what it is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Di_Maio
Dr. Vincent J. M. Di Maio is an American pathologist and a nationally renowned expert on the subject of gunshot wounds.[1][2] Di Maio is a board-certified anatomical, clinical and forensic pathologist, and a private forensic pathology consultant.[3] He attended St. John's University and the State University of New York (SUNY), and received postgraduate training at Duke University, SUNY, and the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of Maryland.[4]
Di Maio is a veteran of the U.S. Army Medical Corps, and served as chief medical examiner of San Antonio, Texas until 2006, when he retired; Di Maio has more than 40 years of experience as a forensic pathologist.[4][5] He has been editor-in-chief of the Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, and a professor of the Department of Pathology at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.[4] Di Maio is a fellow of the National Association of Medical Examiners (NAME) and the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, and in 2011 he was appointed to the Texas Forensic Science Commission by Governor Rick Perry.[3][6]
Di Maio has authored or co-authored four books and numerous articles related to forensic pathology, and has won several awards for his work, including the Outstanding Service Award from the National Association of Medical Examiners.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Even a nurse can tell you zimmy was not severely injured , and his slight injuries don't coraborate his statements ( lies)
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)It is about the injuries that you are in fear of sustaining.
As another poster put it, consider a man is swinging an axe at your head with the obvious intention of killing you. He misses his first swing. You have no injuries. By your standard, you can't shoot as you have no injuries. By the law, you can shoot because you are afraid that he will connect with his next swing.
That is the way self-defense law works. If you shoot someone because of injuries that you have already sustained, no matter how serious, then that is revenge and is illegal. You shoot because you are afraid of future injuries and don't want to sustain them.
Dr. Di Maio is not paid to lie. If he is ever caught lying then he would lose his ability to be an expert witness. He is paid to give his expert opinion on gunshot wounds.
libodem
(19,288 posts)It makes me sick.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)But then I don't know anyone who supports Zimmerman.
Do you?
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)And his not guilty verdict.
I'm surprised you missed them.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)And none of them have defended Zimmerman.
And among all DU members, I've only seen people say that they believe the outcome was reasonably given the poor police work and evidence, and others who say that it's just as likely that GZ was the one crying help and not TM.
Neither position, IMHO, represents 'defending' Zimmerman. A lot of people would like to associate 2A supporters with GZ fans, but I just don't see it and I've been here a long time.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)PD Turk
(1,289 posts)I support the use of guns for legitimate self defense. I however do not support assholes like GZ who want to play John Wayne and stalk and kill innocent kids. GZ should have been locked up for life IMO.
Everything he did goes against everything I believe and everything I was taught from the time I got my first gun.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)and as far as I can recall, his characters never did so to an innocent, much less a child.
I get the point you're making, but I think putting the Duke's name out there gives way too much elevation to Zimmerman.
PD Turk
(1,289 posts)I was just thinking of the kind of character GZ imagined he was in his distorted little mind.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Apparentlly no background check if there was something to keep him from getting a gun, or a law requiring background checks.
Zimmerman was fine. It was that kid.....no law needed here...move on..
quinnox
(20,600 posts)He fulfills a fantasy many of them have, the vigilante/hero, strutting around carrying a big gun, ready to deal out justice to the bad guys. No wonder they back him to the hilt.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Did/could they arrange charges that couldn't work that are still publically backed by the nitwit prosecutor......are they responsible for the discarded grand jury who might have looked into Zimmerman's background with a handful of subpoenas ...who can theybe?
All ended well. No outcry for new background laws needed here because of this simple case. Racism and that kid...blame them....NRA is taking a breath.
Paladin
(28,271 posts)Zimmerman got to use his pistol against an innocent but scary-looking black kid, and he got away with it. That qualifies as a Happy Story among the Our Guns Are More Important Than Your Lives crowd. Don't believe me? Check out the kind of incidents that are posted down in the Gun Control/RKBA group. Oh, hell, let me spare you all that: somebody gets shot to death in virtually every one of them, much to the delight of our Gun Enthusiasts.
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)...you can't.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)So I guess I fit with your theory.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Lots of responsible people have guns and I hope not to offend any of you.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Tin-gods cannot exist without their parishes.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Derp.